[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 18 KB, 253x400, 871530.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4944782 No.4944782[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

What are /lit/'s thoughts on this book?

>> No.4944871

the paper there is good enough for postnatal abortion

>> No.4944964

I didn't know /pol/ could write let alone a whole book

>> No.4946185

can someone tell me a bit about the book

>> No.4946188

>>4944964
legitimately lol'd

>>4944871
the paper is good enough to be pulped and made into a good novel.

>> No.4946236

>hysterical misogynistic ramblings
>frustrated virgin
>kills himself in his early 20s

LOL, what a book

>> No.4946241

dude was insane

>> No.4946242
File: 152 KB, 717x1024, 1401051041693.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4946242

>>4944782
>sex & character

>hurr durr why aren't women as deep as Socrates, as disciplined as Marcus Aurelius, as ambitious as Napoleon...hurr they must all be shit and shallow!!

Why do philosophers have retarded expectations about women?

They are just supposed to be kind and generous. If they are mentally stable and cute then you got yourself a keeper.

>> No.4946247

Feminism may be fallacious, but his arguments are even less supported by evidence.

>> No.4946405

is the book even worth reading. Will it worsen by secretly unfavourable view of the average woman.

>> No.4947152

>>4946242

A true male intellectual is by nature misogynistic. That is a part of what makes him intelligent enough to qualify as an intellectual.

>> No.4947157

>>4947152
This is what permavirgins actually believe.

>> No.4947164

>>4947152
Boooooo.

Bad joke

>> No.4947172

>>4946405

If your view is "secretly" unfavorable, women can probably tell. It very likely manifests in how you act toward them, particularly in your facial expressions and body language.

>> No.4947225

all his assumptions are wrong, you dont need to drop misogyny to understand that.

>> No.4947239

>>4947225

>not ceasing to be an unlikeable misogynist

>> No.4947279

>>4946236

Otto Weininger: Supreme Gentleman

>> No.4947283

eliot rodger in vienna

>> No.4947297

>>4944782
Wittgenstein seemed to have been impressed with it, though he admits to disagreeing with it.

>> No.4948692

>>4944782
not 0.5% as bad as any rad fem literature.

>> No.4948751

>>4947164
>no fun allowed femicunt

>> No.4948772

>>4947297
Wittgenstein was a closeted homosexual and social autist. not a great recommendation

>> No.4948779

He is right.

>> No.4948898

>>4946242
>Actually saying hurr today

>> No.4948910

I think it's a shame the first 50-100 pages are mildly pseudoscientific and bunk because the rest of it is actually really good and can be superimposed theoretically on more modern stuff. Probably a lot of people end up dropping it. Especially people who are only reading it so they can find stuff to scoff at it and reaffirm their devotion to the glorious status quo.

>> No.4949232

sexist literature
only permavirgins read it

>> No.4949251

>>4948772
It's actually a great recommendation.

>> No.4949266

>>4944782
Is that supposed to simbolize the uterus, tubes and ovaries?

>> No.4949278

>>4944782

Sounds like The Way of the Superior Man, only bullshit.

>>4947164
>bad joke

Stay offended.

>> No.4949291

Didn't read it, but based on my research, Weininger sounds like The Supreme Gentleman in a past life. If so they didn't learn much. Poor guys.

>> No.4949296

Weininger was a genius.