[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 1.94 MB, 230x160, sasha grey is a qt.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4927926 No.4927926[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Philosophy is for internal/pensive people who don't quite want to commit suicide.

>> No.4927933

>>4927926
What can I say?

I have commitment issues.

>> No.4927950
File: 114 KB, 640x360, 1381426912832.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4927950

>>4927926

sounds like me, but I'm more of a fiction guy. Can deep novels count as /phil/ ?

this is kind of unrelated but I find sasha grey to be very attractive when she is wearing normal clothes. if you could edit all the kids out those pics of her at that elementary school would be 24 karat fap material.

>> No.4927959

>>4927950
She would be beautiful if I didn't have the gangbangs and the toilet seat burned into my retinas

>> No.4927983

>>4927959
It was probably very well cleaned beforehand; replaced with a new seat even.

ontopic: I can't imagine an internal thinker who ISN'T troubled

>> No.4927989

>>4927959

yep.

>> No.4928018

>>4927983
What's an internal thinker?

>> No.4928047

>>4928018
Someone who has an emphasis on thinking and spend time developing ideas. Alone/quiet/focused.

>> No.4928167

>>4927926
How deeply philosophical of you OP.

>now please be an hero

>> No.4928203

>>4928167
You don't sound very happy

>> No.4928209

>>4927926
sooo Socrates?

>> No.4928221

Meaningless existence is for people who don't know their already dead in side

>> No.4928240

>>4928221
Philosophers are the kind of people who would rather argue about meaningless lives of others, rather than bother to spell they are, or inside, because semantics is a trivial detail when struggling with MUH TRUTH VALUE.

>go suck a tailpipe, philopleb

>> No.4928454

confirmed

>> No.4928546

I'm retarded

>> No.4928550

philosophy is for pseudo-intellectuals with frail egos who feel the need to inject their own ideology into whichever maxim they can get away with

>> No.4928659

Only if their dumb. If their smart they can still do science instead.

>> No.4928665

>>4928659
Thank you for your valuable contribution

>> No.4928666

>>4928659
>their

my anus clenched palpably

>> No.4928684
File: 51 KB, 640x417, Ok mad.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4928684

>>4928659
>their dumb
>their smart

>> No.4928715

The question of a philosopher is: The meaning of a cause that could in turn cause something else.

>> No.4928717

>>4928715

>not what is the good life

>> No.4928719

>>4928717
What cause can in turn cause "the good life"

>> No.4928722

>>4928715
That's not a question. I don't see any question mark.

>> No.4928728

>>4928722
The question is "How does a philosopher think" the answer is "The meaning of a cause could in turn cause something else"

>> No.4928730

>>4928722
Is this not a question. You should know it's possible to parse incorrect grammar?

>> No.4928751

>>4928722
The philosopher asks: "what does it mean that something causes something else?"

does that satisfy you?