[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 23 KB, 333x500, dq.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4880102 No.4880102[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Can we all agree that this was better (and more important) than anything Shakespeare ever wrote?

>> No.4880123

Sons of Anarchy script is better than Shakespeare but doesnt make it more influential

>> No.4880124

sure why not

>> No.4880125

I like the equally.

>> No.4880126

>>4880102
Hamlet beat him to the punch as far as Western meta-fiction goes.

>> No.4880132

>>4880123
Didn't say that its quality is what makes it more important.

>> No.4880137

>>4880132
Important, influentical,here, same thigns.

>> No.4880150

>>4880137
...what?

>> No.4880155

>>4880150
>more important than Shakespeare ever wrote
It is not more important, because its less influential.

>> No.4880156

>>4880126
This. Hamlet is much better than DQ.

>> No.4880160

>>4880155
What are you talking about? I didn't say anything concerning the difference between important and influential. I don't know where you're getting this from.

>> No.4880169

>>4880160
How do you measure importance if not through influence

>> No.4880175

>>4880169
>I didn't say anything concerning the difference between important and influential.

>> No.4880189

>>4880175
OP post implies its more important than Shakespeare.
How can it be so if its not more infleuntial

>> No.4880194

>>4880189
>I
>didn't
>say
>anything
>concerning
>the
>difference
>between
>important
>and
>influential
Can you fucking read? I said absolutely nothing regarding what you're trying to argue about. Not one thing.

>> No.4880206

>>4880194
OP said

>> No.4880207

>>4880206
No he didn't.