[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 26 KB, 274x300, nietzsche the bietzsche.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4875875 No.4875875[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

You guys only like this moron ironically, right?

>> No.4875877

>>4875875
We think he's a moron ironically.

>> No.4875879

i'm honestly surprised at all the praise he gets here. i'm embarrassed for his followers.

>> No.4875881

Nietsche is bestsche

>> No.4875885

>>4875875
Nope.

I love him.

No homo.

>> No.4875887

>>4875885
>liking morons

>> No.4875890

>>4875887
Thanks for your worthwhile contribution to 4chan!

>> No.4875891

Can we draw the red line here? Or will the OP just keep samefagging his own thread to make it look like anyone actually responded to it?

>> No.4875896

>>4875875
>"you guys"
/lit/ is constantly arguing over everything, you can't expect us to agree on something

>> No.4875899

>>4875890
Better than Nietzsche's "contribution" to philosophy.

>> No.4875907

>>4875899
You are the reason for the modern definition of existentialism

>> No.4875909

>>4875899
Philosophy pretty much died along with Plato.

>> No.4875911

>>4875907
>>4875909
Lol

>> No.4875916

>>4875909
>Philosophy not dying with Heraclitus
SOMEONE didn't start with the greeks.

>> No.4876028
File: 114 KB, 640x1136, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4876028

>>4875907

>ontic pleb

>> No.4876039

>>4875875
posting in a truly epic thread

>> No.4876040

>>4875909
Platos definition of Being was flawed in my opinion as he didn't have much of a cohesive definition as he did on the conditions of being.

>> No.4876055

>>4875875
>You guys only like this moron ironically, right?
Ad hominem: is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument

>> No.4876094

>>4876040
Do you know anyone who has put forward a definition of being that was not flawed?

>> No.4876100

>>4876094
see >>4876028

>> No.4876105

>>4875875
nobody, and i mean nobody, adheres to 100% of what he says, or anything close. we just find him interesting. i though the genealogy of morals was really eye-opening when i first read it.

>> No.4876167

>>4876105
I think his morals are the WORST aspect of him. The only thing he wrote that's worth anything IMO is his writings on art and metaphor.

>> No.4876168

I like his Übermensch concept and God is dead is simply iconic.
Is pure madness and i love it

>> No.4876394

Indeed, it is very disturbing how seriously he and others like >>4876028 are taken. Continental philosophy is in a dismal state.

Here's a good read: http://www.friesian.com/poly-2.htm

>> No.4876415

>>4876167
i hardly agree with his first-order ethics, but his metaethics is pretty thought-provoking.

>> No.4877175

>>4875875
>not getting the overarching and massive comedy

You don't understand Nietzsche. You assume so much at face value. There is irony, depth, and humor on levels you obviously don't comprehend.

Nietzsche was one of the most humble men to ever live, you simply haven't looked into it enough