/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.4807685]

In what ways are Sartre and Kierkegaard comparable?

[Anonymous No.4807687]

>>4807685
why was Sartre wrong?

[Anonymous No.4807699]

>>4807685
They both attempt to deal with the moral and epistemological void left after the death of god.

Both of their answers are fundamentally pessimistic about knowing the nature of externality.

Both of them were shown up by bitches who demonstrated a capacity for action in the world to inform a self-structuring answer to the death of God: deBeauvoir and Nietzsche respectively

[Anonymous No.4807732]

>>4807699
>They both attempt to deal with the moral and epistemological void left after the death of god.
There was no death of god. Nietzsche is a false prophet.

[Anonymous No.4807741]

>>4807732
Use man's reason to fully comprehend God.
Hell, use man's reason to demonstrate God's existence.
(You're free to use Spinoza instead of an invisible space pickle)

[Anonymous No.4807743]

Kierkegaard > all other existentialists

He was humble, which is the surest sign that he was smartest of them all (see Socrates).

[Anonymous No.4809244]

>>4807743
what's to be seen of that illiterate bum?

[Anonymous No.4809325]

>>4807743
>i dont think im wise, the gods told me that
wow so humble
talking about socrates bullshit ofc