[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 15 KB, 251x242, 1397018030872.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4772310 No.4772310[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>by far and away
>hence why
>the reason is because

>> No.4772326

you're thread a shit

>> No.4772339

>all of a sudden

>> No.4772340

>>4772310

>The reason why

>> No.4772353

>>4772339
But that's right

>> No.4772359

>Exacerbating

>> No.4772366

>>4772353
Can something be part of a sudden?

>> No.4772389

>>4772339
I never understood why people refuse to use the word "suddenly". It replaces "all of a sudden" in every feasible scenario.

>> No.4772433

>per say

>> No.4772446

>the thing is is that
...or as I like to think of it,
>the thingiz is that

>> No.4772450

>>4772366
Only if you are Douglas Adams.

>> No.4772452

>>4772446
we don't do that. what we do do is...
>do do

>> No.4772476

>>4772452
fag, made me laugh out loud then chuckle for a good 10 seconds

>> No.4772493

>>4772452
Some repetitions are defensible grammatically, aside from the awkwardness they sometimes cause. For example, 'what we do do...' isn't necessarily ruled out, but I would say that that one is too strongly associated with something like Young Frankenstein. Likewise 'is' can even be repeated defensibly. The example in >>4772446, though, isn't right at all grammatically; what it is is a big sign that the speaker isn't thinking about words too much.

>> No.4772974

>most of (if not all) of
>of of

>> No.4773152

>as per usual
>a whole nother
>irregardless

>> No.4773247

Many of these are valid criticisms when presented in proper narrative, but could these not be used purposefully when writing an uneducated voice?

>> No.4773258

>>4772389
Nobody uses adverbs anymore.

>> No.4773270

>and but so

>> No.4773330

>>4772389
Wrong. When someone changes their attitude toward you abruptly, you say, ever so slowly but firmly, "All of a sudden," the first word most stressed, your eyes blazing with surprise or a mockery thereof.

>> No.4773464

>>4773330
>When someone changes their attitude toward you abruptly, you say, ever so slowly but firmly, "All of a sudden," the first word most stressed, your eyes blazing with surprise or a mockery thereof.
I don't know what your native language is, but something has been lost in its translation to english.

>> No.4773487
File: 256 KB, 1008x780, prudehon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4773487

>>4772310
"by far and away" means something close to
>largely removed from the other options to a point where it becomes more of a new set than an outlier

>>4772389
'suddenly' rushes you through and puts far too much emphasis on the action. 'all of a sudden' (or 'all of the sudden,' which i prefer) focuses much more on the actual timing and puts emphasis on the immediacy of an action rather than the action itself.

>>4773152
>as per usual
this is so inoffensive that i can't actually imagine what you could be annoyed by.
>a whole nother
the fact that you wrote it this way shows that you don't know what you're talking about

—> = tmesis
another —> a'whole'nother

>> No.4773531

>>4773487
>this is so inoffensive that i can't actually imagine what you could be annoyed by.
>the fact that you wrote it this way shows that you don't know what you're talking about

poor quality bait.

>> No.4773533

>>4773487
I think OP is objecting to the use of the word "by" in "by far and away." Isn't it usually just "far and away?"

>> No.4773666
File: 199 KB, 930x1400, 774984938129844.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4773666

>>4773531
>people think your actual opinions are bait

>>4773533
>It was by (far) the sweetest sap she'd tasted all season.
>It was by (far and away) the sweetest sap she'd tasted all season.
usually, people say "by far and away." editors will "fix" this. editors hate reality.

>> No.4773713

>>4773666
I've never heard anyone say 'by far and away'.

>> No.4773719

>>4773666
>666
begone with thee.
ite ad infernos!

>> No.4773722

>tfw when

>> No.4773748

>>4773487
a whole nother isn't due to tmesis it due to junctural metanalysis

an other -> another -> a nother
a napron -> an apron

>> No.4773790
File: 22 KB, 315x310, 1353478582554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4773790

>>4773722

>> No.4774199

>>4772493
Peter had had "had", Paul had had "had had"; "had had" had had a greater impact

>> No.4774266

>thus

>> No.4774305

>for all intensive purposes

>> No.4774331
File: 30 KB, 500x377, 1392717856149.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4774331

>Running rampant

>> No.4774332

>>4772389

Adverbs are annoying.

>> No.4774402

this is literally the most elitist piece of shit board on 4chan
how can you live like this

>> No.4774408

>>4774402
>literally

>> No.4774418
File: 134 KB, 334x393, Embarrassing.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4774418

>>4774402
>Literally

>> No.4774421

>>4774402
pleb detected

start with the greeks

>> No.4774424

>>4774402
>Literally
You are a literal idiot.

>> No.4774426

>>4774408
>>4774418
>>4774424

#rekt

>> No.4774438

>be more pacific

>> No.4774445
File: 23 KB, 385x264, 420.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4774445

>>4774438
retards are a diamond dozen

>> No.4774449

>>4774438
>>4774445

Malapropisms breathe like rabbits. A new one is always just a hare's breath away.

>> No.4775992

>>4773330
>the first word most stressed

ya no

>> No.4775999
File: 169 KB, 310x325, 1395097377446.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4775999

>The reason is because...

>> No.4776326

>regardless

>> No.4776504

>>4772310
>implyng using "the reason why" is not better than "thus" and sounding like a pretentious faggot

>> No.4776505
File: 85 KB, 620x400, amused essien.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4776505

>>4774449

>> No.4776512

>>4776326

>irregardless

>> No.4776525

>Including these, and discluding those...

>> No.4776544

>try and

>> No.4776549

>"that just begs the question!"
>not said in reference to circular argumentation
This shit pisses me off.

Also
>that's illogical!
>no reference to formal fallacies

>> No.4776588

>>4776525
>discluding
First recorded 1440, rare but still sometimes used, common as a technical term in dentisty

>> No.4776595
File: 222 KB, 600x400, 9531341234134.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4776595

>>4773748
that sounds unlikely but interesting.

>>4773713
i'm sure there's a regional component. i live in the midwest and if you said—
>It was far and away the quickest match of the tournament.
i would raise an eyebrow and have a bit of trouble parsing the sentence.

>>4774332
what a startlingly stupid notion