/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.4633842]

>you will never watch history's greatest philosophers feverishly debate each other on live television

[Anonymous No.4633854]

[Anonymous No.4633857]

Philosophers debate each other on TV in France. Big name lectures as the Colege de France get packed like a football stadium.

[Anonymous No.4633867]

>>4633857
Meanwhile in America

[Anonymous No.4633868]

>>4633867
As if that were a necessary debate

[Anonymous No.4633871]

where the fuck is baudrillard and derrida on a panel on current events and then voting for them?

My god. america. a kid's tv show dude, debates a braindead opportunist creationist. that country needs to die faster

[Anonymous No.4633872]

>>4633868
That's the point I'm trying to make

[Anonymous No.4633878]

>>4633872
And I wasn't disagreeing with you, just adding to the thread

Jeez

[Anonymous No.4633880]

Хайдеггер сила, Ницше это власть, Платон отец, Спиноза в жопе заноза, декарт вообще хуй простой. Почему Лейбница нет?

Деррида Соссюр у Барта.

Анон выше прав, Америка должна скорее умереть нахуй.

Это философский тред, братья пиндосы?

Гегеля и Дебора ещё совсем забыли.

[Anonymous No.4633883]

>>4633867
Что за хуи? Какого толка мыслители? Телешоу я так понимаю, развлекательное?

[Anonymous No.4633893]

>>4633842

>history's greatest philosophers

>Heidegger
>Nietzsche

You don't HAVE to follow the academic trends, you know.

[Anonymous No.4633908]

>>4633893
А что с ними не так, сударь? Это ёбаная классика, какие ещё тренды? Почему ты считаешь что это тренд?

[Anonymous No.4633909]

>mfw Leibniz and Plato tag team everyone

Monads and forms!

[Anonymous No.4633915]

>>4633893
>Nietzsche
>trend

So are you butthurt at the academy because nobody will let you into graduate school, or are you butthurt at the academy because your PhD isn't landing you a job?

[Anonymous No.4633968]

>body slam

[Anonymous No.4633992]

>>4633968

>piledriver

[Anonymous No.4634010]

>>4633992

Aquinas would probably destroy any Enlightenment philosopher. These scholastics studied rhetoric and the intricacies of language/grammar in a way that would not be seen again until modern linguistic philosophy. Plus, scholastic disputations were intense.

[Anonymous No.4634179]

>>4633893
trends define greatness

[Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ No.4634616]

>>4634010

[Anonymous No.4634668]

>tfw you'll never be able to cuddle with and/or run your fingers through Soren Kierkegaard's hair.

[Anonymous No.4634676]

>>4634668
I didn't want to feel this morning, m8.

[Anonymous No.4634700]

>you will never watch Wittgenstein run on stage with a red-hot poker and thrust it towards everyone on stage

[Anonymous No.4634704]

>>4634668
>You'll never touch Jesus' Holy Hands that soothe your vexed soul like it's 33 AD

[Anonymous No.4634705]

>you will never see Nietzsche get #rekt by Schopenhauer and start saying "nana can't hear you" as everybody gangs up on him and calls him out on his shit

[Anonymous No.4634713]

>>4634705
>You'll never see Nietzsche raising his hammer above silly Schopenhauers head.

[Anonymous No.4634714]

>tfw he was one of the greatest debaters of all time
>tfw he could have even triumphed over people like Cicero and Demosthenes
>tfw he's dead

;_;

At least he's in heaven debating with all the great philosophers.

[Anonymous No.4634717]

>>4634715
>greatest debaters of all time
Yeah let's cite historical narratives to discredit religion
good one mate

[Anonymous No.4634715]

>tfw he was one of the greatest debaters of all time
>tfw he could have even triumphed over people like Cicero and Demosthenes
>tfw he's dead

;_;

At least he's in heaven debating with all the great philosophers.

[Anonymous No.4634718]

>you will never comfort your qt absolutist bf after he gets bullied during a debate

;_;

[Anonymous No.4634719]

Does anyone have the image someone shopped of "Demiurge the Hedgehog" and it ends with "And FUCK YOU Thomas Aquinas etc"?

[Anonymous No.4634725]

>>4634717

[Anonymous No.4634729]

Watch? I'd prefer hearing.

[Anonymous No.4634738]

>>4634719
there you go !

[Anonymous No.4634748]

>>4634738
>Please stop dispatching scribes to deliver me scrolls askin why thats why.

every time

[Anonymous No.4634750]

>>4634729
reading > hearing > watching > drug-induced delusion of telepathic communication with

[Anonymous No.4634751]

>>4634715
>At least he's in heaven debating with all the great philosophers.

[Anonymous No.4634772]

>>4634715
lol i know you're trolling but his debate with that christian apologist dude is flat out embarrassing. especially considering how much easier his side was to make a case for.

[Anonymous No.4634914]

postman wouldn't be happy with that

[Anonymous No.4634982]

>>4634750
Nah man, half the fun of any philosophical debate it how upset the participants tend to get. I want to hear it in their voices.

[Anonymous No.4635014]

>>4634982
philosophical debate is absurd in principle
why put the most difficult and subtle of problems into a format that encourages emotion and ulterior motives

[Anonymous No.4635019]

>>4634738
As a Neoplatonist sympathizer I don't know how to feel about this.

[Anonymous No.4635228]

>>4634700
Fucking this. I wish I was there when that happened... The sheer force of intellect... hnnnnngggg

[Anonymous No.4635235]

All of them?

Is Marx invited? I know he's an economist, but come on, you couldn't just not invite him.

[Anonymous No.4635259]

>>4635014
>philosophical debate is absurd in principle
>Philosophical debate
>absurd in principle
>in principle

Nigger where do you think the word philosophy comes from, and how do you think it was argued? By fucking stone tablets?

[Anonymous No.4635281]

>>4635235
Yes and he'd destroy everyone. Except for Bakunin and Diogenes, of course, who will just awkwardly interrupt everyone with mumbles, quips, shitting on the podiums, and taking everyone else's complimentary lunches.

[Anonymous No.4635282]

i just ate 2 eggs.
feel free to debate this with me

[Anonymous No.4635351]

I think the most interesting thing about that idea would be to hear what all those dead guys think about our current world, how their ideas were (ab)used, how hundreds to even thousands of years after you died in some cases people were still reacting to your work or at least a version of it.

[Anonymous No.4635461]

It would be boring as fuck. They can't into debate. Philosophy is literally just "I hold this baseless opinion for emotional reasons, and if you disagree I'll use rhetorical fallacies against you." If you put these philosotards togethere IRL, they'd probably start crying and throwing stuff at each other very quickly.

If you want to see real talk, watch a science discussion.

[Anonymous No.4635489]

>tfw no austere jewish qt gf who will capture my heart through philosophy

[Anonymous No.4635508]

>>4635489
>tfw no jewish qt to talk about Levinas with
:(

[Anonymous No.4635509]

>Mr. Marx, what are your thoughts on the Soviet Union?

>mfw every marxist would be on suicide-watch

[Anonymous No.4635563]

>>4635461
every damn time with this /sci/ shit
we get it, philosophy is dead or whatever; can't you let us circlejerk in peace?

[Anonymous No.4635588]

>>4635461

Actually reading philosophy and basing your opinion on what these philsophers said would make your argument somewhat valid, but sinse you are teh average /sci/ pleb that doesn't read your opinion is invalid.

[Ƹ̵̡Ӝ̵̨̄Ʒ No.4636540]

>>4634772
>with that christian apologist dude
Which one?
>Implying he didn't win a debate on this topic.