[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 104 KB, 732x306, lit.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4381884 No.4381884[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

It's been a while since we've had one of these.

/lit/ Humor thread

>> No.4381893
File: 71 KB, 960x1174, lit has a debate.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4381893

>> No.4381900
File: 74 KB, 425x487, My life... I wish....jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4381900

>> No.4381904
File: 37 KB, 991x327, lit.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4381904

>>4381900
>pic related

>> No.4381915
File: 1.00 MB, 2800x2100, Philosophers.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4381915

>> No.4381917
File: 112 KB, 922x691, elites.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4381917

>> No.4381929
File: 43 KB, 512x359, 1365169687728.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4381929

>>4381915
>The French Encyclopaedia
>tl;dr
always

>> No.4381952
File: 134 KB, 1000x258, doorknob.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4381952

>> No.4381959
File: 39 KB, 717x960, hemingway.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4381959

>> No.4381981
File: 119 KB, 921x418, Untitled picturesze.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4381981

>>4381959

>> No.4382001
File: 43 KB, 1477x301, lit funny.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382001

>> No.4382006
File: 99 KB, 1066x811, litfun.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382006

>>4382001

>> No.4382012
File: 7 KB, 664x167, Noread.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382012

>>4382006

>> No.4382019
File: 5 KB, 662x92, NSA.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382019

>>4382012

>> No.4382038
File: 438 KB, 1583x2755, dat meta tho.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382038

>> No.4382048

trolley pls

>> No.4382054

>>4381959
Does someone have the whole story?

>> No.4382062

>>4382054
http://fuuka.warosu.org/lit/thread/3642888
You can still see the pics.

>> No.4382079
File: 256 KB, 1320x1476, 1383101125315.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382079

>> No.4382080
File: 130 KB, 430x700, whitepeopleproblems.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382080

>>4381884
this one actually makes me cringe pretty bad but it's supposed to be funny I think

>> No.4382083

>>4382062
Do you think Adam Corso would allow this to be released in my friends literature journal that has quite a few blank pages to fill?

>> No.4382084
File: 243 KB, 404x507, lovecraftdoge.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382084

>>4382080
here's another shitty one

>> No.4382085

>>4382019
At least you'll have one guaranteed reader...
;_;

>> No.4382090

>>4382084
here's a classic made by some 2clever fag about how symbolism isn't a thing

>> No.4382092
File: 47 KB, 574x600, symbolism.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382092

>>4382090
forgot pic

>> No.4382093

>>4382080
You see, it's funny because anxious and angry suburban teenagers who don't fit in at school are typically the ones that identify the most with Holden Caulfield. It's a very funny and original joke. I don't think I've ever seen someone make fun of The Catcher in the Rye before, actually.

Did you know that Holden Caulfield complains a lot? I bet you didn't.

>> No.4382096
File: 307 KB, 700x1096, writersblock.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382096

>>4382092
writer's block

>> No.4382097
File: 484 KB, 1137x1972, 1378184446121.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382097

>>4382079

Better version

>> No.4382098

>>4382092
I've never really understood why it's a Venn diagram when the message is supposed to be that the two subjects have no similarities.

>> No.4382100

>>4382092
>intersection left blank
really?

>> No.4382101

>>4382092
>>4382092
Holy Shit

This ! I remember writing long novels describing why an author would make a character do something like coughing

>> No.4382102
File: 632 KB, 570x765, 1380201824659.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382102

>>4382084

>> No.4382104

>>4382096
That one's mostly supposed to be self-deprecating.

>> No.4382105

>>4382093
>"He's just so annoying, like, maybe if you stopped complaining you'd have friends!"
>"And he smokes and drinks, what does he think that makes him cool?"

The only thing worse than this is the literature teacher who's just too cool to understand the book and agrees with the students that it sucks.

>> No.4382108

>>4382093
*tips deerstalker*

>> No.4382109
File: 229 KB, 977x919, englishmajor.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382109

>>4382104
Yeah I know, I like that one.

This one's probably my favirote

>> No.4382111

>>4381959
JAHOOKIE!

>> No.4382112
File: 84 KB, 445x290, 1378143048383.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382112

>>4382102
>Reply

>> No.4382116
File: 25 KB, 628x351, bukowskicleverbot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382116

>>4382109

>> No.4382119
File: 42 KB, 500x376, perfectthe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382119

>>4382116

>> No.4382120
File: 101 KB, 500x300, shortstory.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382120

>>4382119
And that's more pictures than I thought I had and I'm not going to look for more

>> No.4382125

>>4382097
the third footnote always kills me

>> No.4382127
File: 49 KB, 900x365, 1386280044599.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382127

>>4382112
>infiniter reflect

>> No.4382132
File: 125 KB, 301x251, folan[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382132

>>4382105
>He didn't even bang that hooker! What a pussy, bro!

>> No.4382136
File: 205 KB, 960x979, 1378880872409.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382136

>> No.4382141
File: 522 KB, 490x265, 1369078551062.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382141

>>4382127

>> No.4382142

>>4381900
this picture is stupid

>> No.4382143

>>4382132
Fuck, yes, exactly

>> No.4382144

>>4382093
I never noticed this, my fellow gentleman. I will have to revisit the novel once I have finished reading the Fountainhead by acclaimed libertarian novelist Ayn Rand.

>> No.4382165

>>4382144
Is this just a slightly more wordy version of "*tips fedora*?"

>> No.4382209
File: 373 KB, 974x1000, Fuck you, cunt.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382209

>>4382092

Oh god, that pic still makes me mad as fuck

>> No.4382214
File: 389 KB, 574x600, 1387402651417.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382214

>>4382092
revision

>> No.4382218

>>4382209
Lel faggot, do you even deconstruct?

>> No.4382223
File: 96 KB, 465x600, 1363050765994.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382223

>>4381915

>Plato looking up
>Aristotle looking down

Every time

>> No.4382225

>>4382214

This picture is misguiding. Mis-en-Scene is utilised by any writer who wishes to utilise it. The writer of the essay would have to refer to other 'blue' objects in the novel to assume any allusion to depressive states - or at least, this would get the grade.

Anyone can interpret anything as anything - it's about connecting related dots (which they warn you not to do lest you end up in the asylum)

>> No.4382234

>>4382225
except how many authors of novels just say "take from it what you will, and take from it whatever has the most meaning to you personally."

the majority

>> No.4382280

>>4382234

People read what they see, will read what they will, and no writer wishes to create 1 dimensional characters, or sell no books. Writers might be the first to understand the subjectivity of character, hence why 3-dimensional characters are more successful than 1-dimensional. People take what they will from life and everything and It is the writers job in life to accommodate as many people as they can - this means making the story relatable to as many people as possible, which means writing 100 stories in 1 - 100 interpretations.

Of course the author is saying something themselves but they wouldn't be naive enough to expect you to understand it right away.

>> No.4382282

>>4382097
>and but so you all know him
this whole thing killed me then, killed me now
happy i saw it unfold in realtime.

>> No.4382296

>>4382282
haha, did you recognize that phrase, too? fucking nice

>> No.4382309

>>4382296
>>4382282

I don't get it. Did David Foster Wallace use "and but so" in his writing alot?

>> No.4382311

>>4382282
>>4382296
ohhhh shit
is that because he occasionally strung together conjunctions to affect an informal, colloquial tone in his fiction
shit, I just fell off my chair because I'm laughing so fucking hard

>>4382309
yeah man he did it like four times in Infinite Jest
shit's funny as fuck

>> No.4382312

>>4382309
And but so [1]

[1] Yes.

>> No.4382585
File: 24 KB, 1148x257, 1387414167459.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382585

This reminds me of you, /lit/

>> No.4382594
File: 89 KB, 1194x848, 1386890055512.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4382594

>> No.4382595

>>4382585
jesus. this is the feeling I've spent my whole life trying to overcome.

finally have

alpha now

>> No.4382597

Basically this
http://fuuka.warosu.org/lit/thread/S4258911 contains a lot of relevant material (you can see pictures)
Also some edgy idiot gets hilariously trolled in the thread as a bonus.

>> No.4382605

>>4382585
>not turning around and confessing your pure love in a romantic-comedy style monologue right then and there

How can you fuck up so badly

>> No.4382617

Rate my short story /lit/. It's called Mr Doggle's Wonderful Penis

Mr Doggle had a wonderful penis. A scrandtacular, pendiferous penis. If you asked it a question, it would always know the answer. If you patted it on the head three times, it would give you a cookie. If you tickled it's chin, it would tell you a bed time story. One of these bedtime stories went like this:

There once was a boy named Neberon. He liked to walk down the street after dark. One day he bumped into a dingdong named whodabby, who was hobnobbin with the jews. But oh no! He stuck his toe in a pot of jam, and all the churches fell down.

Mr Doggle loved his penis, as did all of the townsfolk. But there was one townsfolk who was jealous of Mr Doggles penis: this man's name was Butt Henry. Butt Henry would always tell jokes, but no one ever paid attention to his jokes, because they were too busy patting Mr Doggles penis on the head. So one day, Butt Henry took a knife, and STABBED Mr Doggle's penis. It bled and bled, and the townsfolk were quite afraid: what if Mr Doggle's penis died? Who would tell their children bed time stories, or answer their questions, or give them wonderful delicous cookies? Who they asked, who?

>> No.4382621

The answer, it turned out, was nobody. Mr Doggle's penis died, three days later. The townsfolk were quite upset. Without the bedtime stories of Mr Doggle's penis, the children became rambunctious. They began having sex with goats, and sheep, and elephants, and all different kinds of animals. In a tough situation like this, the townsfolk would normally ask Mr Doggle's penis what to do, but without his penises sage words of wisdom, the townsfolk were too stupid to come to a decision on any course of action, so they simply allowed their children to continue having sex with animals. It was strange and disturbing at first, but over time became routine, and eventually it became abnormal for children NOT to engage in sexual relations with members of another species.

Meanwhile, Butt Henry suddenly found that he had an audience for his jokes. So he would tell his jokes, and people would listen. But they still didn't laugh. This made Butt Henry very sad, so he decided to shove a pinecone up his ass. It felt fine going in, almost enjoyable, but then when Butt Henry finally got bored with having a pinecone up his ass and decided to pull it out, the pain was excruciating, and he was unable to pull it more than an inch before it's scales became completely embedded into the flesh of his sphincter. He called an ambulance, which whisked him away, but only blocks away from the hospital the driver of the ambulance cried in alarm: there was a child having sex with a rooster, right in the middle of the road! The ambulance swerved and slammed into a tree. Another ambulance eventually arrived to carry everyone from the first ambulance to the hospital, but by the time Butt Henry was finally brought to the ER, it was too late; his ass had to be amputated. Butt Henry was quite upset at first, but he decided to make the best of the situation, and had his ass stuffed by the local taxidermist. He mounted his own ass above the mantle, where it remains to this day.

And they all lived happily ever after.

>> No.4382636

THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE CONTAINS THE OPINION OF AN AMERICAN
PLEASE TAKE MOMENT TO PAUSE WHAT YOU ARE DOING AND GATHER FAMILY OR FRIENDS TO YOUR COMPUTER
YOU ARE ALSO ENCOURAGED TO USE THE 'PRINT SCREEN' FUNCTION ON YOUR KEYBOARD TO MAKE RECORD OF WHAT YOU ARE ABOUT TO WITNESS

*** - NOW FOLLOWING IS THE OPINION OF AN AMERICAN - ***

>>4382617
>>4382621
I kind of like this story

***- THIS HAS BEEN THE OPINION OF AN AMERICAN - ***
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
YOU MAY NOW RESUME YOUR SCROLLING OR OTHER ACTIVITIES

>> No.4382649

>>4382636

every trip becomes a satire of itself; just as expected.

>> No.4382960

>>4382605
>"Listen, I fucked up. I know it. You know it. I'm just a big screw up. Hell, I can't even get outta bed in the morning without messin' SOMETHING up! I'll forget to wear my socks or put on deodorant or comb my hair or something. I'm lazy, I'm insecure, I'm incompetent, I THINK too much, and I don't SAY enough. I'm...I'm...I'm crazy. But I'm crazy for you. That's all I know. And I'm well aware that I don't got a whole lot to offer you here. There's so many guys better for you than me. But if you can just find it in your heart to look past my bare feet in a pair of shoes or my stinky armpits or my messed up hair in the morning when you wake up next to me, I promise I'll make it worth your while. Please...forgive me. Just give me another chance and we...we can be screw ups...together..."
Sex ensues.

>> No.4383033

>>4381959
I REMEMBER THIS HOLY SHIT

>> No.4383040

http://fuuka.warosu.org/lit/thread/S4132813
http://pastebin.com/Sfa80CZ3

kid started poetry thread. turned into him posting his anonymous correspondence with some girl(on pastebin). absolutely hilarious.someone ended up reading the whole thing on vocarro.

>> No.4383059
File: 4 KB, 240x101, IWASTHEREGANDALF.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4383059

>>4381959

>> No.4383101
File: 3 KB, 496x86, lit on moot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4383101

Starting a dump

>> No.4383105
File: 137 KB, 1048x578, You are a woman..png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4383105

>>4383101

>> No.4383107
File: 54 KB, 1875x342, lit on Islam.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4383107

>>4383105

>> No.4383111
File: 127 KB, 1899x341, lit on r9k.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4383111

>>4383107

>> No.4383115
File: 128 KB, 1708x884, lit in charge of reading books.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4383115

>>4383111

>> No.4383119
File: 30 KB, 442x178, lit on the holocaust.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4383119

>>4383115
I don't remember what this one is but I'm posting it because the filename I gave it sounds decent

>> No.4383125
File: 14 KB, 407x286, tumblr_inline.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4383125

recent but golden

http://bayimg.com/dAeIaAaFK

>> No.4383126
File: 984 KB, 3180x2088, lit on nihilism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4383126

>>4383119

>> No.4383133
File: 47 KB, 480x418, forms.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4383133

>>4382223

>> No.4383134
File: 38 KB, 1872x289, 1387427054364.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4383134

>>4383126

>> No.4383138
File: 43 KB, 720x295, [curtain falls].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4383138

>>4383134

>> No.4383140
File: 172 KB, 1897x580, lit in a nutshell.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4383140

>>4383138
Shit, I need to organize my image folder

>> No.4383141

Does anyone have a cap of that thread that had something to do with the simpsons that just went on forever? Can't remember what it specifically was but I just remember it being glorious.

>> No.4383142

>>4383119
was that from the spongebob thread

>> No.4383162

>>4383101
Nice dump, a lot of oldies-but-goodies

>> No.4383229

>>4382102
>ya I rite so wut?
>look at dogs face

Fuck

>> No.4383245
File: 256 KB, 977x919, paging doctor faggot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4383245

>>4382109

>> No.4383251
File: 267 KB, 600x1178, traditional vs self publishing.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4383251

>> No.4383327
File: 109 KB, 824x281, 1387321936399.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4383327

>> No.4383633
File: 985 KB, 500x252, 1385655251554.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4383633

>>4381915
>That non-chronology
everytime

>> No.4383657

>>4381915
>schopenhauer

lol'd

>> No.4383675

>>4383245
>being this bitter about wasting your degree

>> No.4383687
File: 139 KB, 1612x884, 1357939798330.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4383687

>> No.4383693
File: 198 KB, 640x480, patrick.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4383693

>>4383687
>I once jerked off to a fantasy in which I was fucking the grand canyon

>> No.4384102

>>4383687
>>4383693
Does anyone have the /v/ screencap from the anon that had a fetish for the entire state of Colorado I think it was?

>> No.4384116

>>4381915
>Bakunin

>> No.4384255
File: 1.74 MB, 2036x3604, ohayo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4384255

>>4384102
it was Ohio

>> No.4384338

>>4382142

You've never wanted to have the ability to pull a girl just with a single pretentious statement about a book that is HIGHLY debatable in truth?

>> No.4384350

>>4384338
Do you think it might be wise not to use rape-y terms like "pulling a girl" on a moderated board?

>> No.4384353

>>4383687
I'm surprised everybody revolted against the dictionary fapper, because I did that too. I mean, not technically, because I didn't fap, but I read sex related words as a means to sexual arousal

>> No.4384360

>>4384350

Are you being serious right now?

>> No.4384368

>>4384350
I don't like the adjective "rape-y", I think it trivializes rape by transforming the word into a cute description of misogynistic behavior instead acknowledging rape to be a brutal act of violence. Please do not post such remarks again, they are offensive.

>> No.4384384

>>4383675
>being unable to appreciate humour

This isn't a dick-measuring contest kiddo

>> No.4384386

>>4384368
#rekt

>> No.4384408

>>4384386
#memed #:) #;-)

>> No.4384467

>>4384350

>mentally stable human being
>thinking pulling a girl is wape

>> No.4384491
File: 157 KB, 1001x388, 1358019564656.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4384491

>> No.4384513
File: 176 KB, 1182x606, lit 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4384513

>> No.4384516
File: 144 KB, 1255x505, 6lj7dvfbtqhbr8x08oqpuo7lb.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4384516

classic

>> No.4384536
File: 79 KB, 250x238, 1384741510486.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4384536

>>4384350
>rape-y terms like "pulling a girl"
You can't be serious.

>> No.4384557

An anrcho-syndicalist American analytic philosopher and linguistics professor was teaching a class on Bertrand Russell, known logician.”Before the class begins, you must get on your knees and worship Russell as the most influential philosopher of the 20th century, even more influential than Jacques Derrida or any other continental philosopher!”
At this moment, a brave, psycho-analytic, Hegelian Marxist philosopher and cultural critic boldly stood up and tugged at his collar.
”My god, pure ideology! How can you ignore the work of Lacan and the Frankfurt School and so on and so on, like that? ”
The arrogant professor smirked quite Jewishly and smugly replied “Continental philosophy cloaks trivialities in fancy language and uses the scientific-sounding term 'theory' to describe propositions that could never be tested empirically. ”
”Wrong. If empiricism is so important, as you would say, then how come you were so empirically wrong on the Khmer Rouge and Cambodia, and so on and so on?”
The professor was visibly shaken, and dropped his chalk and copy of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus . He stormed out of the room crying those unironic empirically verified crocodile tears.
There is no doubt that at this point our professor, Noam Chomsky, wished he had pulled himself up by his bootstraps and become more than an outdated linguist and blindly analytic philosopher.
He wished so much that he had an argument to save himself from embarrassment, but he himself had advocated for truth derived from empirical investigation!
The students applauded and all dropped out to transfer into the École Normale Supérieure that day and accepted French philosophy as superior to both German Idealism and the Anglosphere's Analytic traditions.
An eagle named “Critical Theory” flew into the room and perched atop a burning American flag and shed a single tear on the dropped chalk. Sections of Lacan's Seminars were read several times, and the Spirit of Hegel himself showed up and demonstrated the nature of dialectics so vividly that everybody in the room progressed to a trans-physical state transcending conventional notions of time and space.
The professor lost his tenure and was fired the next day and was forced to become a panelist on an MSNBC news show to make ends meet.
The brave psycho-analytic philosopher's name? Slavoj Zizek.

>> No.4384563

A Jewish allied homosexual professor and Treaty of Versailles supporter was teaching a class on Theodor Adorno, known Marxist.
”Before the class begins, you must get on your knees and worship Einstein and accept that he was the smartest man ever, even smarter than Gottlob Frege or Karl Schmitt.
At this moment, a brave, Aryan, 14/88 SS Obersturmbannfuehrer who had killed 1500 Untermenschen on the Ostfront and understood the necessity of war and fully supported all military decision made by Nazi Germany stood up and showed a picture of an Aryan man.
”What can you tell me about this, Rassenschande?”
The arrogant professor smirked quite Jewishly and smugly replied “He is just a man, no different from an Untermensch, except the Jews are probably even smarter”
”Wrong. It is the proven master race, tracing his lineage back to every people that ever accomplished something and has every right to struggle for Lebensraum.”
The professor was visibly shaken, and dropped his chalk and copy of das Kapital in Hebrew. He stormed out of the room crying those Schmutzig-Judische crocodile tears. The same tears Judeo-Bolshevists cry for the “gassed” when they jealously try to claw justly earned land from the deserving Uebermenschen. There is no doubt that at this point our professor, Schlomo Marxstein, wished his people were not causing all the troubles the Reich was facing, and wished he didn’t deservedly got what was coming to him for that.
The students applauded and all registered to the Nazi party that day and accepted Adolf Hitler as their Feuhrer. A Reichsadler named “Germanentum” flew into the room and perched atop the Nazi flag and shed a tear on the chalk. The first couplet of “Deutschland uber alles” was sung several times, and Thor himself showed up and roused the people for totalen Krieg all across the Reich.

The professor lost his tenure and was sent to Auschwitz the next day and didn’t die there because the Holocaust never happened.

Sieg Heil

>> No.4384579

A white heteronormative cisgendered CEO professor and Baptist preacher was teaching a class on Karl Rove, known Christian.
“Before the class begins, you must get on your knees and worship Jesus Christ and accept that you too can become straight through daily prayer, self-flagellation, and eating Chik-Fil-A every day!”
At this moment, a brave, trans-Asian, self-diagnosed pansexual demiromantic vegan multisouled person who had been free of all animal products and only bought products at the local transgender co-op boldly stood up, holding a glass filled with some white liquid.
“Hey, Professor, what is this?”
The arrogant professor smirked like a rapist and smugly replied “It’s clearly milk, you crazy faggot. What the fuck does milk have to do with political science?”
“Wrong. It’s an all natural vegan soy almond kombucha latte. No animals or transpeople were harmed or raped in the making of this product.”
The professor was visibly shaken, and dropped his chalk and copy of the Wall Street Journal. He stormed out of the room, clearly planning some kind of rape. The professor realized that he had been playing into the hands of the kyriarchy of CEOs, investment bankers, the Religious Right, and psychiatrists. He then killed himself. The proper term for this is “trans-dead”.
The students checked their privilege, all diagnosed themselves with autism and gender identity disorder and joined the Gay-Straight Alliance. An obese trans-eagle furry otherkin waddled into the room and tried to perch upon the American Flag, bending the flagpole in the process. All parties involved gave up meat, Christianity, and the right to bear arms.
The students all lifted their glasses of soy fluid in a toast.
“That beverage’s name? Harvey “The One Percent” Milk.” said the vegan trans-autistic Korean.

>> No.4384865

>>4382083
If you can contact him, probably.

>> No.4384882
File: 53 KB, 1248x211, lit.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4384882

Thought you guys might enjoy this

>> No.4384889

>>4384882
That's pure genius

>> No.4384895

>>4384882
i dont get it

>> No.4384900

>>4384895
Underage b& detected

>> No.4384905

>>4384882
Took me a while..reminds me of Nietzsche

>> No.4384911
File: 25 KB, 406x536, 1383569534233.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4384911

>>4384882

>> No.4384931

>>4384882
nice

>> No.4384946

>>4384882
i don't get it, what is this about?

>> No.4384960

>>4384946
Everything, my friend. Seek and ye shall find

>> No.4384972

>>4384882
This is like a koan or some shit.

>> No.4384975

>>4384882
Is this like an accurate description of life or something?

>> No.4384977

>>4384882
Oh my god, that is perfect.

>> No.4384979

>>4384882
Omg that's so dumb wt- holy shit i get it.

Sides obliterated.

thanks, /lit/

>> No.4384981

>>4384895
>>4384946
>>>/s4s/1413606

>> No.4384991

>>4384981
>>4384882

I see...

its even better on /lit/ because people think its realated to a philosophy or something.

>> No.4384995

>>4384991
>>4384981
Still pretty funny though...right guys?

>> No.4384997

>>4384882
I'm capping this

>> No.4384999

>>4384981
4/10 I pondered

>> No.4385166

>>4384882
epic, simply epic

best post on /lit/ in a long time

>> No.4385227
File: 7 KB, 199x253, schopenhauer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4385227

daily reminder that /lit/ is full of sperglords that hide their autism and insecurities behind a veil of feigned intellectual superiority, which they think they have somehow aquired through reading highschool level YA or genre fiction.

>> No.4385237

>>4385227
Quite.

>> No.4385247

>>4385227
daily reminder that /lit/ is full of the pretentious and depressed who bandwagon big names in literature so as to avoid thinking for themselves.

>> No.4385249

http://fuuka.warosu.org/lit/thread/S4360601#p4365979

>> No.4385289

>>4385227
I've seen this sort of post about a million times. You're not clever.

>> No.4385312

>>4385227
Most indeedly.

>> No.4385318
File: 189 KB, 731x502, autism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4385318

>> No.4385321

>>4385289
It doesn't need to be clever if it's a truth

>> No.4385326

>>4385321
But, is it?

>> No.4385334

>>4385326
i don't know

>> No.4385438

>>4382097
Whoever wrote that could have been DFW's ghostwriter holy shit

>> No.4385459
File: 166 KB, 305x479, 1385425208065.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4385459

>>4381915
Why is Habermas mislabeled?

>> No.4385465
File: 347 KB, 1125x344, 1387498278516.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4385465

>> No.4385484

>>4385459


i love how sarte always looks so goofy.

i just cant help but love the guy, even though hes a dirty fenchie with dirty frenchie philosophy.

>> No.4385535

>>4385484

>love
>Frenchie

You are already lost. You can no longer be saved by the Light of Analyticism. I am so sorry, my son.

>> No.4385672

>>4383040
this was special

>> No.4385679

>>4385535
>analyticalism
>light
"Kierkegaard is far too deep for me, anyhow. He bewilders me without working the good effects which he would in deeper souls." -Wittgenstein

>> No.4385784

>>4384255
I prefer the guy with the tile fetish.

>> No.4385819
File: 34 KB, 680x406, jason wallace.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4385819

oh hi guise i movie star now

>> No.4385873

>>4381915
I spent like a minute staring at Adam Smith and wondering "wow, did he really only have one hand? I dont remember that coming up in anything I read about him..."

and then I got it. I feel so dumb

>> No.4386286
File: 45 KB, 1341x377, monsieur.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4386286

>>4384882
I know this is a troll, but it's like, it's sad on this deeper level in a way.

>> No.4386381

>>4385438
>implying it wasn't the Bandana Man himself

>> No.4386434
File: 86 KB, 1343x442, 1385842049782.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4386434

>> No.4386512
File: 737 KB, 1337x4712, seven-steps.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4386512

>> No.4386579

>>4384882
>>4384882
Someone for the love of god explain this

>> No.4386591

>>4386579
one of those things where people pretend it's amazing but it's not.

I understand it yes but it's not that life changing.

>> No.4386610

>>4386579
Are you kidding, or just stupid?
>>4384981

>> No.4386617

>>4385873
AWESOME

>> No.4386621

>>4382585
>completely misusing literally
stay pleb poster of that green text.

>> No.4386636

>>4384516
>fucking positivist

Great stuff.

>> No.4386734
File: 2.96 MB, 960x540, 1364861972125.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4386734

>>4385819

>> No.4386739

>>4381917
Source?

>> No.4386949

>>4386739
It's been floating around for ages...

>> No.4387142

There's barely any humor here.

Everyone's depressed.

>> No.4387406

>>4387142
>There's barely any humor here.
>Everyone's depressed.
welcome to /lit/, enjoy your stay

>> No.4387487

>>4386434

perhaps he just inquired if this was ops translation? kafka for sure didnt write this.

>> No.4387488
File: 50 KB, 437x336, ij_desert.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4387488

>> No.4387499

>>4382585
I had a very similar experience.
But instead of a beautiful woman it was a toddler girl.
Not joking.

>> No.4387539
File: 1.82 MB, 300x264, 1387565415900.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4387539

>>4387499
>>4382585

>> No.4387548

>>4386617
I don't get it

>> No.4387592

>>4383126
that thread was brilliant

>> No.4387600

>>4385227
*tips thesaurus*

>> No.4387611

>>4387499

I'll go ahead and assume the you were having pangs of desire for parenthood, and not to diddle.

Feel free never to correct me on that if I'm wrong.

>> No.4387621

>>4387611
Not that guy, but I had the same experiance.
You're wrong.
It can't be explained. When your hand touches hers, and hers are so smooth and gentle, while she looks at you with her innocent eyes so clear and big and full of life. It's hard to explain.

>> No.4387627

>>4387621
>It's hard to explain.

It's quite easy to explain. You're a pedophile.

>> No.4387630

>>4387548
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invisible_hand

>> No.4387634

>>4387611
I'm that guy.

I have a romantic but not sexual attraction/obsession with children, especially toddlers. I look at pictures of them all day but rarely touch them. The touch of her glowing soft skin on mine was simply magical. That was the best day of my year.

>> No.4387636

>>4387634
>I have a romantic but not sexual attraction/obsession with children

Yeah, keep telling yourself it's not sexual. I'm sure you can convince yourself it's true if you repeat it enough.

>> No.4387637

>>4387627
No, I'm not, you whore.

>> No.4387647

>>4387636
I don't care what you think, I know I'm not a pedophile.

>> No.4387650

>>4387647

Whatever, shorteyes.

>> No.4387671

>>4381900
For some reason I find the girl on that pic incredibly cute.
Like, can't-stop-staring-at cute.

>> No.4387674

>>4387647
You are a pedophile. You're getting confused between child molester and pedophile. You're not a child molester yet but you're certainly a pedophile.

>> No.4387686
File: 20 KB, 550x338, y5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4387686

>>4387671

>> No.4387717

>>4387674
No, I'm not.
I'm not confusing anything and I'm certainly not a pedophile. I don't feel sexual attraction to children.

>> No.4387726

>>4387717
Here's a quote I found on the internet that definitely seems to disagree with that statement:
"I have a romantic but not sexual attraction/obsession with children, especially toddlers. I look at pictures of them all day but rarely touch them. The touch of her glowing soft skin on mine was simply magical. That was the best day of my year." - You

>> No.4387733

>>4382136
You know, I've never read a Murakami book but I think this image made me want to buy 1Q84

>> No.4387738
File: 44 KB, 392x500, 1371210552292.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4387738

>>4384557
>>4384563
>>4384579

>> No.4387784

>>4387726
>not sexual

Where's the disagreement? People can't love children anymore without being called pedophiles?

>> No.4387787

>>4387784

If you yourself characterize your love of children as a "romantic obsession" then you're a pedo.

Stop deluding yourself.

>> No.4387793

>>4387784
I love children. They are so cute and innocent and nice. I like them a lot, but they are always far away from me. I really want to hug them. No disgusting things, just hugging and playing.
I think the problem is the word romantic.

>> No.4387814

>>4387793
>thinking children are cute and innocent and nice
Yep, they are always far away from you all right.

>I really want to hug them. No disgusting things, just hugging and playing.
Jesus Christ, how old are you, dude? I wrote a pedophile character a few months ago and I made him say almost exactly the same thing. I'm glad I got the gist of the disorder right.

>> No.4387816

>>4381917
lmao

>> No.4387832

>>4387793
>>4387787
Pedophilia means sexual attraction, not romantic. I'm like one of those asexuals who still have romantic interests.

>> No.4387840

>>4387814
I don't think I'm a pedophile. I don't look at them sexually. I saw some naked kids on /b/ a few times, but I felt really sad and sick; it was disgusting.
>away from you all night
Usually yes, but in some afternoons, I have naps near them. I sleep the best when hugging children.
>I wrote a pedophile character
I'm not going to be an idiot say that you were projecting, but I want to tell you that I could have. Post its pastebin, I am interested.
>how old?
I don't see how this relates, but I'm not very old.

>>4387832
I wouldn't describe my attraction as romantic; I think your isn't the same as mine. I am also sexual and not asexual; I like sex and such things.

>> No.4387847

>>4387840
>I'm not going to be an idiot say that you were projecting, but I want to tell you that I could have.
^classic fear of confrontation and passive aggressiveness that characterizes the preferential pedophile

>> No.4387859

>>4387847
Nice.
But I truly hate using projection in arguments.
Maybe I am passive-aggressive and afraid of confrontations, but that doesn't mean I'm a pedophile, I just explained it in my other post.
I don't understand what you're trying to achieve. Almost all women like children the same way I do, what's so wrong about it? I explained my position in the other post and I don't think this is going anywhere.

>> No.4387898

>>4387840
I only describe my attraction as romantic because there's no other word for it. But it's got nothing to do with sex or couples, I love them more like my own children than anything else.

>> No.4387930

>>4387898
Maybe 'platonic' though I dislike its usage; it is more fitting, however.

>> No.4387984

>>4387840
>Post its pastebin, I am interested.
AND HAVE YOU STEAL MY MAGNUM OPUS? HA. AND AGAIN I SAY, HA.

>> No.4387989

>>4387930
Yes, it's definitely platonic.

>> No.4387997

>>4387840
>I saw some naked kids on /b/ a few times, but I felt really sad and sick; it was disgusting.
I've seen some naked women on /b/ that I found disgusting. In fact, I find most porn disgusting. What does that prove?

>inb4 gay

>> No.4388055

>>4387984
I understand. It's not that you think it's not good enough or anything, of course, considering you finished it.
Here is mine: http://pastebin.com/FE8nv5aj

>> No.4388067

>>4387997
Yeah, I know what you mean. I also share this with you. You're not gay, you're normal.
To be honest with you, some of the pictures of young ones who were naked were absolutely disgusting even for some paedophiles, but there were also some which were merely little girls posing in bikinis/nude and stuff like that; things which people like us would find disgusting, but not the average browser of /b/,

>> No.4388070

>>4388055
>Thinking that a serious writer would ever post their work on 4chan.

shiggydiggydo

>> No.4388074

>>4388070
Well, I just did.

>> No.4388098

>>4388074
You're not a serious writer. Congratulations, welcome to the c/lit/ club.

>> No.4388111

>>4388098
It's true. I'm indeed very easy going and fun; I dare say I'm not serious at all.
I posted my best work, and I think it's decent enough.

>> No.4388115

This was a sort of funny thread until the pedophile came out.

Then it got really funny.

>> No.4388125

>>4388115
I'm not a pedophile, you whore. I explained this already.

>> No.4388128

>>4388115

Guys I'm not a pedophile I'm just obsessed with children and get the vapors whenever I'm near one and can't stop thinking about how smooth and nubile and innocent they are

Geez!

>> No.4388130

>>4387840

I can semi-relate to this

>> No.4388132

>>4388125

Interesting that your go-to insult is "whore," a pejorative that implies sexual impurity, since the pedophile's primary attraction to children hinges on their perceived "purity" and innocence.

>> No.4388139

>>4388128
Yeah, that's not me. I never said I'm obsessed with them and can't stop thinking about them. I said I like them; they are nice.
>>4388132
Yes, it's very interesting. But my main attraction to children isn't their innocence and purity, it's their cuteness and hug-worthy little faces and their eyes. Surely their innocence plays a part, but they also remind me of the old days when I was a child like them.

>> No.4388144

>>4388139

You're Humbert Humbert without the vocabulary, basically.

>> No.4388154

>>4388144
Humbert performed fornication with an infant; I'd never try such an abysmal act. I already explained my case.

>> No.4388162

>>4388158
basically

>> No.4388157

>>4388144
/Lit/ insult of 2013.

>> No.4388158

>>4388144
>You're Humbert Humbert without the vocabulary, basically.

so basically, a pedophile

>> No.4388163

>>4388115
>>4388128
I'm not a fucking pedophile alright. I love children, but not sexually.

>> No.4388168

>>4388163
Yes, like most people, especially women and of those: mothers.

>> No.4388175

>>4388163
When I was little I liked girls, but not in a sexual way. It took few years to make that step up to wanting women sexually.

Fascination usually goes deeper with time. If you aren't a pedophile, I'm afraid you have all the preconditions to be one in the near future.

>> No.4388191

>>4388175
I've liked little girls since I was 14.

>> No.4388197

>>4388191
And it appears that you still like little girls, don't you?

>> No.4388203

>>4388197
Right.

My point is, if my attraction hasn't become sexual in 8 years, it doesn't make sense that it will become sexual in the near future.

>> No.4388207

>>4388175
So all parents are pedophiles, and most people on earth are pedophiles because they like little children and they think they absolutely adorable? Nice.

>> No.4388211

>>4388158
Well, a pedophile with deep-seated insecurities and a desperate need to justify his aberrant sexual desires to strangers.

>> No.4388212

>>4388207
>being this stupid

>> No.4388226

>>4388207
Yes. That fascination with children is what allows pedophillia to exist. 200 years ago when children were seen as young adults pedophillia as we know it didn't exist, people instead raped small adults. Pedophillia is a result ofthe Victorian creation of "the child"

>> No.4388227

>>4388211
What do I achieve if I say that I'm a pedophile?
I don't have sex with them, and I don't look at them that way. This is the core of pedophilia and it's nonexistent in my case; I don't fit the definition of pedophilia.
Again, we're going in circles, my friend.
>>4388212
domage

>> No.4388229
File: 28 KB, 625x417, K.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4388229

>>4388207
>>4388207
There's all the world of difference between finding children adorable and saying that you find them "so cute and innocent and nice," that you have a "romantic obsession" with them, that you want to "hug them and play with them," that "the touch of their glowing soft skin" on yours "is simply magical" and lamenting that they are "always far away."

>> No.4388231

>>4388229
Half of these I didn't say. Especially 'romantic'. These are 2 different posters.

>> No.4388237

>>4388231
>2 different posters
>2 different pedophiles

>> No.4388241

>>4388229
Okay, to make it clear.
>cute nice innocent
they are
>romantic obsession
not me
>hug them
yes, I used to hug my little brother all the time. Now he's older. Those were the days... Nothing wrong with huging
>play with them
Yes. As in: having fun with them and playing with their toys with them, not using them as toys and playing 'with them' as in: playing with the ball.
>touch glowing skin
not me
>magical
not me
>always far away
I was doing a mitch hedberg: 'koalas are so nice and cute, why are they so far away from me. Come, I want to give A Hug'.
>>4388237
hahaha

>> No.4388251

>>4388241

that's it, keep digging bro

>> No.4388271

>>4388251
I think it's over.
I hope I did well.

>> No.4388292

>>4388271
>I hope I did well.
As well as any pedophile can.

>> No.4388311

>>4388292
I hope you're not a heartless whore who doesn't show any sympathy, because calling someone who cares for children 'a pedophile' is really pathetic. I hope you never have children unless you really want to.

>> No.4388327

STOP FUCKING BULLYING THE PEDOPHILE JESUS CHRIST /LIT/ I THOUGHT YOU WERE BETTER THAN THIS

>> No.4388328

>>4384882

explain please

>> No.4388331

>>4388154
Lolita was a tween you nut.

>> No.4388333

>>4388327
>BULLYING
I'm having fun, amigo. I love this.

>> No.4388336

>>4388331
Well, yeah, but unless she bleeds down there, she's no woman. She was 13 years old, I think.

>> No.4388342

>>4388311
>I hope you're not a heartless whore who doesn't show any sympathy, because calling someone who cares for children 'a pedophile' is really pathetic. I hope you never have children unless you really want to.

God, your posts are creepy as fuck. I hope I never have children so I don't have to worry about pedos like you trying to "play" with them.

>> No.4388344

>>4388328
/s4s/ trying to make this a big thing, but it didn't work very well. It was good try, honestly.

>> No.4388347

>>4388336
The poster in question said "infant."

>> No.4388355

>>4388342
Playing is very important for children. I, myself, am concerned for your children, as they'll have a terrible parent who doesn't value one of the vital factors of infants' growth.
>>4388347
The news called a 13 year old 'an infant' last month. I got confused then; it's my fault, sorry.

>> No.4388370

>>4388327
>>4388229
I'm not a fucking pedophile.

I have an obsession for children that is not sexual.

I'm not even close to a pedophile. Pedos seldom care about children, I care about them more than anything.

>> No.4388386
File: 29 KB, 328x248, 4564564.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4388386

>>4388355
>thinking loving one's own children is the same as having an obsession with all children

>> No.4388395

>>4388386
I never said I am obsessed wit children. That was the other poster. To spot him: he uses 'fucking' a lot, which I never use.

>> No.4388400

>>4388370
Philia doesn't necessarily mean sexual dum dum.

My point is that it shouldn't matter even if you are.

>> No.4388401

>>4388386
>>4388395
>thinking loving one's own children is the same as loving someone else's children.

>> No.4388403

>>4388400
''Pedophile'' means sexually attracted to children. At least, for the purposes of this conversation, let's keep it in that definition.

And it should fucking matter because pedophiles are fucking worthless scum.

>> No.4388405

>>4388401
Of course it's not the same, my friend. Your own child has a very dear in your heart regardless of what you wish.
>>4388400
Not that guy, but I thought sexual interest is part of its definition, no?

>> No.4388411

>>4388405
>Of course it's not the same, my friend
Back pedal faster, pedo.

>> No.4388417

>>4388405
It usually does. But in the most simplest terms it just means ' love of children (forms)'; sex is just tacked on there because people easily switch it for love.

I believe one can appreciate the human form at all ages and NOT be a dirty mustachio molester.

>> No.4388431

>>4388417
I still don't think it's suitable. I love children, but I mean it in the broadest sense. I don't get mad at them, and I treat them well, because they are still young and I appreciate their simple nature and cute faces, but I don't mean it in the sense you might be pointing at. It's more positive than negative really, and that includes all consequences.
>>4388411
It's okay.

I had a lot of fun /lit/, thanks. Good night.

>> No.4388440

>>4388431
And then all of /lit/ watched as the noble pedo rode his infant pony into the sunset.

>> No.4388444

>>4388440
Shut the fuck up, Donny.

>> No.4388454
File: 67 KB, 499x314, 1378171241821.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4388454

>>4387840
Tell me more about your habitual viewing of illegal content.

>> No.4388459
File: 29 KB, 988x131, donne.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4388459

From a thread on the effects of pornography on the writer's psyche.

>> No.4388493

>>4387793
I think he means he likes children the way ppl like puppies...?

>> No.4388497

>>4388493
No, pretty sure everything about this post seems the opposite. Such repression, such cluelessness.

>> No.4388517

>>4388493
He said romantic. I don't think your average person is romantically interested in a puppy.

>> No.4388536

>>4388517
see
>>4387989
>it's definitely platonic
Looks like it was just a poor word choice that he later corrected.

>> No.4388933
File: 437 KB, 1944x1465, lit writes a story.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4388933

Fresh out of the fryer.

>> No.4389137

>>4388336
she was 12, 13, 14 and 16, if memory serves

>> No.4389216

>>4382136
Which Murakami book gets the fastest Bingo?

Kafka on the Shore does it in 8 chapters, offhand.

>> No.4389231

>>4388933
topical

>> No.4390204

>>4388493
Yes.
>>4388497
Doubt it.
>>4388517
I didn't say romantic you idiot. I explained this one hundred times. There are two posters here, not one. Fucking read.

>> No.4390408

>>4388055
Really sad none read my pastebin. I thought it was good.

>> No.4390463

>>4390408
ill read it

>> No.4390493

>>4381959
that was the weirdest thread on /lit/ ever. someone found out that the writer of that book was also convicted for owning child pornography, which were actually naked pictures of his 17-year-old ex-girlfriend or something. weird thread

>> No.4390501

>>4390463
Okay.

>> No.4390508

>>4381917

This is is brilliant

>> No.4390519

>>4390501
It was quite good. I didn't expect to get sucked in like that (reminded me little of lolita but that's to be expected from a story like that)

>> No.4390524

>>4382038

>don't encourage the meta.

>> No.4390525

>>4390519
Replace Natalie with Lolita and you'll get the story which inspired Nabokov to write Lolita. It's written by Heinz von Lichberg.

>> No.4390530

>>4390493

> which were actually naked pictures of his 17-year-old ex-girlfriend
>child pornography

Okay, seriously, shouldn't there be another classification for this? Like literally saying "Pornography below age of consent"? Because it's ridiculous that a 19 year old with pictures of his two year younger girlfriend be convicted as a "child pornographer", you don't live that shit down.

>> No.4390571

>>4382102
#struggle

>> No.4390575

>>4390530

The police pretty much get to choose what you get booked on. Then you go to court and figure it out.

>> No.4390580

>>>/s4s/1413606
Yeah, kinda.

>> No.4390581

>>4390493
I remember it. Someone also linked to it here >>4382062
http://fuuka.warosu.org/lit/thread/S3642888

>> No.4393366

bumpity bump