[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 97 KB, 1031x860, descartes_crop.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4353568 No.4353568[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

who is the best philosopher and why is it descartes?

>> No.4353571

inb4 dicks etc

>> No.4353578
File: 864 KB, 242x200, u.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4353578

you're a faggot

>> No.4353579

If Descartes is so good, why is he dead?

Checkmate atheists.

>> No.4353599

I suffer therefore I exist makes more sense than cogito ergo sum
there is no casual link between suming and cogiting, I could sum but not cogit, and I could cogit but not sum
what is undeniable is that suming is suffering and whatever suffering means, we are suffering

>> No.4353636

>>4353599
your sense of suffering comes from your emotions, which are thoughts. Checkm8 anti-penisist.

>>4353568
Hume got so much shit right I boggle like Hank Hill.

>> No.4353685
File: 56 KB, 512x599, Isaac-Brock.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4353685

Best philosopher? Pic related.

>> No.4353724

>>4353599
such edge

>I could cogit but not sum
well you go ahead and try that

>> No.4353733

>>4353636
>emotions are thoughts
full retarded

>> No.4353745
File: 6 KB, 245x206, mynigga.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4353745

>>4353685

>> No.4353880

I am therefore I think
git it rite n00b

>> No.4353891
File: 297 KB, 1920x1080, Descartes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4353891

Because of penises, obvi.

>> No.4353924
File: 15 KB, 272x397, Confucius.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4353924

>> No.4353922

>>4353599
>I could cogit but not sum
Idiot

>> No.4353933

>>4353599
>there is no casual link between suming and cogiting

what the fuck are you talking about nigga

>> No.4354039
File: 18 KB, 300x300, 1348105653355.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4354039

>>4353599
>there is no casual link between suming and cogiting, I could sum but not cogit, and I could cogit but not sum
How?

>> No.4354060
File: 181 KB, 452x572, Leibniz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4354060

Because this guy was the superior continental rationalist

>> No.4354393
File: 142 KB, 700x714, Isdisniggaserious.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4354393

>>4353599
How the fuck can you think but not exist? Even if you claim you are not doing the thinking, you are at least experiencing the thought which requires you to exist.

>> No.4354402

>>4353599
nice dubs m80

>> No.4354511

>>4354060
B-but that's not Leibniz.

>> No.4354576

>>4353568
It's Democritus.

>> No.4354624

>>4353568
because you severely misspelled Schopenhauer.

>> No.4354630
File: 45 KB, 300x386, hermestrismegistus1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4354630

>>4353568
>>4353685
>>4354060
Cute.

>> No.4354638

wrong nerds its kripke

>> No.4354642

>>4354638
Nope.
The other philosophers created grand theories.
What Kripke did beside doing something irrelevant in modal logic?

>> No.4354650

All these continental pussies...

>> No.4354653
File: 16 KB, 204x300, seriously, nigga.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4354653

>>4353568
>123
>not Epictetus
>not practicing stoic virtues

>> No.4354656

>>4354393
>you are at least experiencing the thought
why do you have to introduce an experiencer?

isn't "thoughts exist" enough?

>> No.4354659
File: 318 KB, 1276x1840, kant1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4354659

>2k13
>Choosing anyone other than based Kant.

And I'm a utilitarian!

It's like you don't even transcendental argument.

>> No.4354660

>>4354659
>utilitarian

not worth even arguing with you shit then

>> No.4354668
File: 15 KB, 400x400, 1386148258356.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4354668

>>4354660

You obviously cared enough to let me know I'm not worth arguing with though.

Your posturing is sad.

>> No.4354671

>>4354668
SO SRS

>> No.4354677

>>4354671

heathledgerjoker.jpeg

>> No.4354690

Go to sleep michael

>> No.4355129

>>4354659

I honestly can't believe a lot of 4chan would be big into the Kant.

Hume however... that guys got the answers.

You can argue all of Kants philosophy with Hume. There are only a few ways you can get around Humes arguments,one is to do what nietzsche did, and that was to become absurd.

>> No.4355130

His philosophy of language and sensations is pure garbage, though.

>> No.4355195

Based Heraclitus tough

>> No.4355376
File: 46 KB, 468x484, 1386261905518.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4355376

>>4355129

Probably no.2 after Kant. You're right that he is razor sharp, and his writing often has an air of unassailable common sense truth about it.

But Kant's philosophy is astoundingly creative by comparison. Copernican turn in metaphysics? Fucking genius man, made all the more impressive by the fact that he was writing in the 18th fucking century.

>> No.4355423
File: 17 KB, 266x322, 266px-David_Hume.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4355423

cogito ergo sum? yeah I don't think so nigga

>> No.4355492
File: 8 KB, 190x231, spinoza.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4355492

>Spinoza
>not having the single best system of metaphysics

>> No.4355514
File: 26 KB, 238x231, happysadfrog.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4355514

>>4355492
What place does Art, one of the most important of all human enterprises, hold in Spinoza's metaphysics?

>> No.4355521

>>4355129
but the metaphysics of morals was written to (and directly does) critique Hume

>> No.4355531

>>4355514
>separating art from other enterprises

>> No.4355542

>>4355531
excuse me mate i'm trying to bait someone

butt out please? k cheers