[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 17 KB, 360x600, 1380153341001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4178771 No.4178771[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>There is no such thing as objective truth.

Is this true?

>> No.4178788
File: 42 KB, 625x351, do you even science le funny meme.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4178788

Science proves there is objective truth.

>> No.4178797

>>4178788
>world as interpreted by our subjective senses
>objective

is

this

b8

>> No.4178799

>>4178797
Never heard of pear review?

>> No.4178802

>>4178788
No it doesn't.

>> No.4178806

>>4178799
Objectivity's still a subjective phenomenon doe.

>> No.4178808
File: 27 KB, 775x387, science-vs-philosofaggotry.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4178808

>>4178806

>> No.4178809

>>4178788
Not reallllly. It's about as close as we can get, and it's reliable, but is it really objective truth? I don't think so.

>> No.4178810
File: 14 KB, 262x400, Contingency-Irony-and-Solidarity.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4178810

>>4178771

You're asking the wrong question. Read this book and find out why.

>> No.4178812
File: 1.76 MB, 408x225, 2r5rho4.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4178812

>>4178799

>> No.4178813
File: 326 KB, 800x800, product_photo_346.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4178813

>>4178799
>pear review

Is that where Del Monte checks your facts and make sure it adheres to the rigid standards of canned fruit critique?

>> No.4178817
File: 27 KB, 440x260, 393-The-good-thing-about-science-is-that-its-true-whether-or-not-you-believe-in-it-Neil-DeGrasse-Tyson-quotes-science-reality-truth.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4178817

>>4178806
No, it isn't. Please learn the scientific method.

>> No.4178824
File: 7 KB, 246x282, 1373902051252.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4178824

>>4178817
>atheistmemebase
>facebook
>neil degrasse tyson

>> No.4178834

>>4178810
that book looks like it was self-published

>> No.4178836

WELL LET'S SEE HERE.

I have greater cognitive faculties than that of a bullfrog, so its sense of objectivity (not that it cares) is of a poorer quality than mine because muh brain has more sensory tools than that slimy piece of shit. The fact that I can squash him, or silly slap someone and it has a causes physical sensations means that there's some objectivity to existence.
Case in point: I only see purple spiders on my ceiling when I'm high on methamphetamines. Are they an objective or subjective phenomenon? Well, seeing as how I never get the bastards and no one has ever seen them, and I can fine a causal relationship between my meth consumption and the frequency of purple spiders means that there's objectivity, rather than just cooking up some fucked-off theory like the police always come whenever I'm doing meth to let the spiders into my house. Didn't I mention both are ghosts? Oh, well that too.


not /lit/

>> No.4178842
File: 95 KB, 273x288, 1304669207294.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4178842

>>4178836

>> No.4178861

>>4178788
science establishes fact, not truth, check your privledge

>> No.4178865

>>4178861
GAW NIGGA THREAD'S OVER STFU FOR YOU BUST IN HERE THINKIN THE BULLSHIT YOU GOTS TO SAY IS PORTANT

>> No.4178867

There is objective truth in the world, but since every person interprets the world subjectively there is no objective truth to humans, or any other being for that matter. Unless that is your definition of a higher power.

>> No.4178871
File: 139 KB, 1001x1287, Death_of_Marat_by_David.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4178871

The question is irrelevant, as behaving as if there is objective truth (ie operating under empiricist assumptions) changes circumstances which may lead to new revelation that either affirms or refutes the primary question, while choosing not to operate under those assumptions will not yield any changes in life or the evolution of society and civilization, leading to perpetual stagnation and near certainty that the primary question will never be affirmed nor refuted.

>> No.4178875

>>4178871
>evolution
>stagnation

the way you're using these terms already assumes an objective direction for humanity

>> No.4178881

>>4178867
DIS NIGGA

DIS
FUCKIN'
NIGGA

SURE IF I LOBBED YO BITCHASS INTO LAVA THAT OBJECTIVELY SUCK

>> No.4178885

>>4178881
ONLY IF I SUBJECTIVELY DIDN'T WANT TO BE IN IT.

>> No.4178891

>>4178875
Not objective direction, but certainly *some* direction that can serve to change paradigm and increase chances of the question even being answered (which are calculable in both circumstances)

>> No.4178896

>>4178871
>>4178871
What the fuck are you saying?
>inb4 babby can't read big words
I know all those words and more but I don't use them to be an unsubstantiated obscurantist.

>> No.4178897

>>4178885
NIGGA HOW YOU GONNA NOT WANT TO BE SUBJECTIVELY IN IT WHEN THAT CONFLICTS WITH YA GOD DAMN OBJECTIVE INSTINCT TO SURVIVE
YOU MAY WANNA DIE AT FIRST
BUT AS SOON AS YOU GET NEAR THAT LAVA IT'S GONNA HURT BOI

>> No.4178892

>>4178871
What does some French propaganda have to do with this?

>> No.4178898

>>4178892
you tend to get more discussion off a post if you post an image, or so I've found. I've got an album of art for this purpose.

You should try it

>> No.4178903

>>4178891
you're assuming that evolution is inherently desirable and "stagnation" is undesirable as justification for acting as if objective truth existed

>> No.4178904

>>4178896
What about that used obscure words? Probably the most obscure I can think of is "empiricist" but pretty much everyone discussing objective truth should know what empiricism is.

I guess if I were to simplify it, it would be "we don't know the answer to that right now, but If we act like it's a yes, we have a higher chance of answering it in the future"

>> No.4178907

>>4178891
Whoops, should read 'incalculable"

>> No.4178908

All is void.
Nothing changes to maintain its illusion.
You reach finality when there's nothing left to know.
That only comes when you stop asking questions

>> No.4178909 [DELETED] 

>>4178896
>>4178871
I should rephrase it, BTW, in case anyone is tricked into believing you're saying anything wise: if we do believe there is an objective truth, we might find out if there objective truth or not. If we don't believe there's objective truth, we won't find out if there's objective truth or not.

>> No.4178913

>>4178897
SUICIDE NIGGA

SOME PEOPLE OVERRIDE INSTINCT AND SHIT

>> No.4178912

>>4178904
How does that make the question irrelevant?

>> No.4178917

>>4178903
Yes, that's exactly what i'm doing because it is the sensible position to take (in my opinion)

"Stagnation" implies no further input, and a culture is left to answer the question in the framework of a perpetually similar circumstance. Is it unreasonable to state that this lowers the odds of discovering X compared to the alternative? Even if the odds in both cases are low?

>> No.4178916

>>4178908
It is then that the insecurity of man no longer forces him takes his life seriously, and realizes life is a game, music, a self-creating work of art.

>> No.4178920

>>4178912
I suppose it's not truly irrelevant, I'm just remarking that being as the question cannot be answered with any measure of certainty at this moment, acting as it were the affirmative is the sensible course of action

>> No.4178921

>>4178917
but this all still assumes there is something to be discovered at the end of this road that you've constructed

which you don't know

>> No.4178922

>>4178913
NIGGA
NIGGA NIGGA
THAT DON'T MAKE NO
GOD DAMN SENSE
YOU EVER TRY DROWNING YOURSELF, HUH LITTLE BUSTA? HUH?!
DOESN'T WORK
THAT'S WHY THE LAST THING GOES THROUGH A NIGGAS HEAD WHEN HE'S JUMPING IS
AWWWWWW SHIT MAAMA

>> No.4178926

>>4178917
It is impossible that there is no objective truth because that would be an objective truth.

>> No.4178929

>>4178921
I don't think it implies that, it implies that there is a *chance* such a could exist, and that heading down that road opens the questioner to that chance, regardless of size, being that it would be otherwise totally inaccessible.

>> No.4178931

this is worse than the trolley threads

>> No.4178932

>>4178922
YOU TRY THAT SHIT HUH NIGGA
YOU WANNA TRY SUICIDE N SHIT
THAT BE YO SHIT
YOUR LOGIC BE SAYIN NO ONE CAN DROWN THEMSELVES
NIGGAS DO THAT SHIT

>> No.4178935

>>4178926
No objective truth means objective truth, which means the former is untrue, which voids the latter, etc etc

paradox.

How wonderful