[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 1.15 MB, 1181x1814, 9780575093133.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4161329 No.4161329[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Your favourite Science Fiction book?

I would have to say Roadside Picnic, I'm ashamed to say I only discovered it recently but I loved it. I did feel I had to read over sentences quite a lot due to some translation errors, or so I believe. Did anyone else get that?

>> No.4161365

Asimov's "The Complete Robot". It was one of the first real scifi books I read and I read it at a really young age. There are a few crappy stories in there and I guess on a technical level Asimov isn't the best writer out there, but he does create some really interesting moral problems and situations.

Kind of odd I'd like a book like that when I was like 7 or whatever.

>> No.4161372

I've read it in german and didn't notice any translation errors. At least in retrospect. I liked the book pretty much but my favourite is Snow Crash. Even though Neal Stephenson sometimes needs to slow down on the weird sexual stuff. If I remember correctly one part in the Cryptonomicon was dedicated to hairy armpits or something.

Forgot about Philip K. Dick, Stanislaw Lem and Asimov. "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" is awesome.

>> No.4161386

I'd go with Roadside Picnic as well. I read it a couple years ago and loved it. and yeah, the translation that's been around for a while wasn't that great. especially that last sentence or two of the entire book, that was laughably bad.

There's a new translation out that I bought last year but haven't actually gotten around to reading yet, but I can say the translation of the last page is loads better than the older translation.

>> No.4161389

I'm not huge on sci-fi but my favourite is Left Hand of Darkness.

>> No.4161403

>>4161386
Indeed, I was actually somewhat confused at the ending.

>> No.4161405

Probably Ender's Game (lol). I've never been able to get into Sci-Fi other than that book. However, I did 'try' to read Valis by Dick not too long ago. I just couldn't finish it though. It was too bizarre.

>> No.4161430

Ubik

>> No.4161466
File: 1005 KB, 1941x1836, solaris.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4161466

Solaris

It was the first very technical sci fi that I read and really enjoyed it.

>> No.4161512

VALIS if that counts, if not, then probably The Forever War.

>> No.4161516
File: 25 KB, 320x522, The_Caves_Of_Steel_f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4161516

>>4161329
Stalkerfag here. Unfortunately didn't enjoy Roadside Picnic much.

>>4161365
>>4161372

Asimov for life. The Expanse series is very good also.

>> No.4161524
File: 420 KB, 329x548, Lord_Valentine%27s_Castle[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4161524

Or maybe the sequel.

>> No.4161594 [DELETED] 

Best sci-fi out there is "Horace and the Moleman."

Never heard of it? You will. A pirated copy is making the rounds. It's hilarious... It's up on Amazon now. Looks like the same version I got.

Havent read anything like it since Hitchhikers.

>> No.4161686

best sci-fi at the moment is " Horace and the Moleman"
Never heard of it? You will. A printout of the thing was going around the dorm. Its up on Amazon now. Same version from what i can tell. Havent read anything like it since Hitchhikers.

>> No.4161694

>>4161430
Oh, the archetypical, seminal Dick novel. Yes, it came after The Three Stigmata, but it's Ubik that blows your mind and reconstruct it in ways you'd never believe.

>> No.4161696

>>4161686
go to bed Cyrus

>> No.4161700

>>4161686
promoting your book on 4chan? How desperate.

>> No.4161885
File: 100 KB, 600x616, foyle.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4161885

Alfred Bester's The Stars My Destination.

>> No.4162260

Has anyone else read Rajaniemi's Quantum Thief? Opinions?

>> No.4162270

Stanislaw Lem's "Observation on the Spot". It's as intelligent as it's hilarious. Lem was a great sci-fi author.

>> No.4162274

>>4161885
This.

>> No.4162278

Anyone read Olaf Stapledon's Last and First Men or Star Maker?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_and_First_Men
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Maker

>> No.4162365

>>4162278
many times

>> No.4162522

Hyperion cantos

>> No.4162567

>>4161885
This thread is full of some awesome choices, but this is seriously the only reasonable answer.

>> No.4162573

I really liked Rendezvous with Rama when I read that.

>> No.4162575

>>4162522
I'm tired of re-re-re-reading the book of the new sun. I'm tired of discussing and loving Hyperion to no end, and I'm not willing to read the follow-ups to TBOTNS right now.

What kind of similar (a choral cast of characters, intertwining stories and interesting and weird as fuck lore) short SF books are there?

With short I mean, for example:
TBOTNS: 4 books that are in total ~1100 pages, with a 300pages long coda
Hyperion cantos: 2 books that are in total ~1200 pages. (endymion is unnecesary).

>> No.4162600
File: 38 KB, 316x480, 4532543541.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4162600

sequel is great too

>> No.4162605

>>4161885
Oh man, i love this one. Even today, I say something like "WE'RE ON OUR WAY TO DEMOLITION" in my head when something goes wrong or something awful is about to happen.

>> No.4162610

I'm not really into sci fi, but it's Solaris and Roadside Picnic for me.

>> No.4162621

Eight, sir; seven, sir;
Six, sir; five, sir;
Four, sir; three, sir;
Two, sir; one!
Tenser, said the Tensor.
Tenser, said the Tensor.
Tension, apprehension,
And dissension have begun

>> No.4162660
File: 32 KB, 190x291, the dispossessed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4162660

Pic related.

I liked 2001 A Space Odyssey a lot too but I should re-read it. It's been so long.

The Stars My Destination was a wonderful read as well.

>> No.4162662

>>4162621

Aaah yes! This one was another fantastic read!
From >>4162660

Thanks for the post. Made me smile.

>> No.4162683

Stories of your life and others.

Best collection of short stories I've read too even better than Borges'.

>> No.4162687

>>4161516
Why did you not enjoy it? I liked the games and movie and loved the book

>> No.4162728

close candidates are either hellstroms hive by frank herbert or for some inexplicable reason i love shades children by garth nix, read it as a kid and still enjoy it now, even though i find it cringey and cliched.

actual winner would be a scanner darkly - PKD if it werent for the fac that theres really no science fiction involved, so UBIK probably wins.

ive heard VALIS is great, but is it one of his more philosophical ones or not? i found the 3 stigmata of palmer eldritch abit theological for my liking.
pretty much all the books mentioned so far have been ace though...such a misjudged genre.

>> No.4162733
File: 46 KB, 356x500, stanislaw-lem-eden[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4162733

>ctrl+f Stanislaw
>0
I disapoint /lit/.

>> No.4162766
File: 26 KB, 287x475, n1929.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4162766

I'd have to say this, though it's not without its flaws. Runner ups are Non-Stop and I Am Legend.

>>4161885
I always preferred the Demolished Man myself!

>>4162733
He's mentioned like four times, twice by his first name.

>> No.4163418

Solaris for sentimental reasons, but otherwise...

Blindsight, probably. The ideas pack quite a punch, and the execution is close to flawless.

Same with Flowers for Algernon.


Glad to see the Bester love in this thread, he's brilliant. And so is (in his own way) Rajaniemi. So many Chekov's guns...

>> No.4163437

>>4163418
sentimental reasons?

>> No.4163448

>>4161386
how did the old translation end?

>> No.4163449

>>4163437
One of the first sci-fi books of quality I've read (I was eleven), and I own an autographed copy.

I tend to re-read it every 2-3 years.

Doesn't mean I haven't come to regard some of Lem's other books as better, or that I don't have any problems with 'Solaris' now, but... yeah, sentimental reasons.

>> No.4163769

>>4163448
Here's the old one
Look into my heart. I know that everything you need is in there. It has to be. I never sold my soul to anyone! It's mine, it's human! You take from me what it is I want... it just can't be that I would want something bad! Damn it all, I can't think of anything, except those words of his... 'HAPPINESS FOR EVERYBODY, FREE, AND NO ONE WILL GO AWAY UNSATISFIED!'
versus the new one
Look into my soul, I know--everything you need is in there. It has to be. Because I've never sold my soul to anyone! It's mine, it's human! Figure out yourself what I want--because I know it can't be bad! The hell with it all, I just can't think of a thing other than those words of his--HAPPINESS, FREE, FOR EVERYONE, AND LET NO ONE BE FORGOTTEN!

not a major spoiler but thought it best to use spoiler tags just in case.

>> No.4163793

>>4161885
First I've heard of this. Sounds fucking awesome, thank you for mentioning it.

>> No.4164311

Gateway/forever war, both hit the right chords in me. Both I really enjoyed.

>> No.4164368

>>4162278
I already read Last and First Men twice, fucking loved it, I'm just starting Star Maker now.

>> No.4164438
File: 34 KB, 500x282, Dune Cat The Spice Must Flow.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4164438

>Ctrl+F
>No "Dune"
C'mon, /lit/

>> No.4164446

>>4164438

I love Dune, but I love it because of how it makes me feel. I don't think it's a very interesting book, the characters are dull as hell and the story is incredibly monotonous.

>> No.4164451

Permutation City, very powerful ideas.

>> No.4164496

>>4164311
god gateway sounds so interesting

>> No.4164544

For me it's Chasm City, although I am yet to try the Strugatskys.

Anyway, Reynolds writes the hardest sci-fi I know, everything seems so legit and interesting. On top of that the whole fable was really tight.

>> No.4164554
File: 163 KB, 800x1286, Lord-Of-Light.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4164554

I loved Solaris, Neuromancer, Ubik, The Stars My Destination, Nova.

Then I read Lord of Light. To this day nothing came close.

>> No.4164555

>>4161372

Fucking loved snow crash. The technical descriptions got me.

I've been on a William Gibson binge recently though. On the last book of the sprawl trilogy. I'm not sure I enjoy how he plays with continuity, but it's an enjoyable read.

>> No.4164570

>>4164438
>>4164446

This. It's a pretty bland read, but the nostalgia and world building pulls at me.

I was exposed to that shit when I was 11 and thanks to that I will forever romanticize the wasteland.

>> No.4164576

>>4162600
love this. can't wait for causal angel

>> No.4164578

>>4162683
Ted Chiang is the shit too

>> No.4164584

>>4162687
The book is only loosely connected to the Movie and while the games kind of have the same atmosphere they differ heavily in content.

>> No.4164601

Memoir Found in a Bathtub - Stanisław Lem
I felt like this book was written just for me.

>> No.4164633

>>4164601
wow this was one of my very least favorite lem books, but to each their own

>> No.4164644

A Canticle for Leibowitz by Miller, Jr. or Last and First Men by Stapeldon.

>>4162733

muh nigga

>> No.4164653

>>4163418
I'll also vote for Blindsight.

>> No.4164938

I started reading the SF Masterworks collection a few months ago, so far I have read:

Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?
Man Plus
Ringworld

Now I am currently reading Non-Stop by Brian Aldiss, I've nearly finished it.

I think out of these I enjoyed Man Plus the most, and also Ringworld, but I like them all so far.

I would like some recommendations as to what I should read next.

>> No.4165014
File: 41 KB, 316x470, vacuum diagrams.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4165014

dem timescales. I wish his writing was better but I can take it for the sake of the ideas.

>> No.4165047
File: 223 KB, 890x524, book_of_the_new_sun_by_palmerst-d4z6pfw.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4165047

See Pic Related.

The Fifth Head of Cerberus is also another Wolfe Classic.

>> No.4165275

>>4163769
What's so bad about the old one?

>> No.4165785

>>4164653
Just finished Blindsight after someone on /lit/ recommended it and loved it. Sequel (Watts calls it a "sidequel") is slated for this August.

>> No.4166282

>>4165785
Horey sheit, I didn't know that.
Thanks, anon!

>> No.4166293

>>4165785
His website is a fucking mess, what's the book called?

>> No.4166413
File: 10 KB, 181x278, lastandfirstmen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4166413

>>4161329
The Last and First Men. Arguably the most important sci fi book in the English language. It inspired Arthur C. Clarke to write.

>> No.4166428

>>4162278
I read Last and First Men in one sitting, on my computer. It is the best hard sci-fi i have ever read.

Starmaker looked promising, but i haven't gotten through it all yet.

>> No.4166447

>>4164554
I'll second this, it has some good humor in it. Yama-Dharma was my favorite character.

>> No.4166882

roadside picnic is still on my to read pile, I will definitely read it after I finish my current book. I absolutely love the premise of it.

>A picnic. Picture a forest, a country road, a meadow. Cars drive off the country road into the meadow, a group of young people get out carrying bottles, baskets of food, transistor radios, and cameras. They light fires, pitch tents, turn on the music. In the morning they leave. The animals, birds, and insects that watched in horror through the long night creep out from their hiding places. And what do they see? Old spark plugs and old filters strewn around... Rags, burnt-out bulbs, and a monkey wrench left behind... And of course, the usual mess—apple cores, candy wrappers, charred remains of the campfire, cans, bottles, somebody’s handkerchief, somebody’s penknife, torn newspapers, coins, faded flowers picked in another meadow.

>> No.4168482

>>4166293
The novel is called Echopraxia. When you type his name into google the first sight that comes up is his first, now defunct blog; the second hit is his current website.

>> No.4168507
File: 411 KB, 601x908, Echocomp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4168507

>>4168482

>> No.4168846

Desolation Road by Ian McDonald.

Relevant question: are there any other magical-realism sci-fi books? I love the combination.

>> No.4168900

>>4168482
Thanks, m8.

I still couldn't find what the book is about.

>> No.4168943
File: 22 KB, 322x438, cover.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4168943

After Life by Simon Funk

>> No.4169001
File: 90 KB, 495x821, d-alexander-smith-marathon[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4169001

Just started this.

I like pulpy stuff; although I gotta say, I'm digging Marathon's first-contact scenario.

>> No.4170775

>>4168943
Cool cover. Tell us something about the book, anon.

>> No.4171451
File: 74 KB, 336x500, Forever War.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4171451

>>4161329
Forever War.

>> No.4171465
File: 28 KB, 255x400, Childhoods End.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4171465

>control + F
>no Childhood's End

Seriously /lit/, do you even sci-fi?

>> No.4171482
File: 13 KB, 200x328, Inverted World.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4171482

Anyone else a big fan of Inverted World here?

>> No.4171575

Just started reading Blindsight and I'm about 20% into the book (kindle masterrace).

Was anyone annoyed by all the SF jargon? And I'm not unfamiliar with it either, I just found the narrative tone rather off putting.

Also, vampires? What the fuck?

>> No.4171576

>>4171482
What's this?

>> No.4171606

>>4171575
Jargon? Could you give some examples? I wasn't annoyed at all.

About the vampire: at first I thought it was going to suck, but have patience. The vampire aboard the ship has some pretty good science stuff around him.

>> No.4171649

>>4171482
I am!

>> No.4171726

>>4162573
best science fiction book of all time. without a doubt

>> No.4171734

>>4171726
It's good, but if you think that's the best, you should read more SF.

>> No.4171813

>>4171734
Agreed. Great book, but by far from the best.

>>4171575
I thought the v ampires made it an interesting twist and they were made to fit neatly into the book.

>> No.4171917

>>4171734
What are your favorites anon?

Interested in someone's view who has more experience in sci fi

>> No.4171935

>>4171917

Blindsight
Childhood's end
I, Robot
Forever War
Starship Troopers
Do androids dream of electric sheep

Just to name a few that are better than "Rendezvous".

>> No.4171950

>>4171465
The fact that End wasn't mentioned was part of the reason I was happy with the thread. God that book is terrible.

>> No.4171953

>>4171950
Why is it terrible?

>> No.4171969

>>4171953
The total lack of characterization? Mediocre writing? The fact that the "story" is just an excuse for Clarke to talk about humanity evolving? The fact that said human evolution is rambling new age blather? A huge disappointment given how often it's mentioned, I really found nothing redeeming in it.

>> No.4171984

>>4171969

Yeah, it's that kind of book. The events matter, not the characters.
If you don't appreciate this structure in SF, it's not the book's fault.

Stay away from Foundation, because it's more of the same.

>> No.4171989

>>4171984
I wouldn't mind that if the events weren't so stupid. Foundation, comparatively, is quite good.

>> No.4171994

>>4171989
Which events were stupid?
I think the story is well tied and the ending is very good.

>> No.4171998

>>4171984
And also, that dichotomy is bullshit. I read The Lathe of Heaven by Le Guin on Monday, and it has both events of importance and fully realized characters. Failing to have one or the other might be a structural choice, but it's still a failure.

>> No.4172015

>>4171998
It's not a dichotomy in any way. It's just the way some books are.
If the writer can write all aspects into the same story, better. If not, you must be able to understand what kind of book you are reading, instead of thinking that all books must develop it's characters.

Never read that book. What do you think of Left Hand of Darkness? I finished it this week.
I liked the premise, but I think Le Guin didn't do much with it and much of the book was wasted on that trip on the ice.

>> No.4172028

>>4171994
Let's see, the whole Ouija board part was pretty dumb. Then there was the fact that all of a sudden there are psychic children, then those children are super beings, and then they all join in a huge hive mind so that they can become one with the universe. Then everything magically disappears, how amazing! New Age blather.

>> No.4172045

>>4172028

Well, I think the ending was a good explanation of why the aliens wanted Earth to evolve.
The children were not sudden. The aliens were pushing evolution that way.


I don't remember that Ouija board part, it's been a while.

>> No.4172070

>>4172015
>If not, you must be able to understand what kind of book you are reading
You mean a poorly written one? Writers don't pull stories fully formed out of some realm of Platonic ideals, they craft them. If you come up with a story like Childhood's End where you have a concept you want to explore, as a writer you should create a situation where you can explore that concept AND have characters with characterization, as well as some half-way decent writing (though many science fiction writers aren't very handy with prose, so I guess we can cut them some slack on the last point).

I thought the Left Hand of Darkness was solid, but I agree that the premise could have been further explored and the trip took far too long. Lathe was better

>>4172045
And I think the ending was an excuse for Clarke to talk about humans becoming one with the universe and the given rationale was a poor one. The children were sudden, humanity went from normal to psychic-telepathic hive mind who in the end transcended their physical bodies in one generation. It makes the X-men look realistic by comparison.

>> No.4172113

>>4172070
And to get the thread back on track, some of my favorites:

A Canticle for Leibowitz (Miller)
The Book of the New Sun (Wolfe)
Fourth Mansions (Lafferty)
We (Zamyatin)
Stations of the Tide (Swanwick)

>> No.4172129

>>4172070
Poorly written only if you are stuck in a formula for what a book should be.
I don't care for any of the characters in a book like this and I don't miss doing it. Plenty of people also don't.
This style of SF actually pleases me, because I read this genre because of the ideas and extrapolations, not because of characters.

I'm not saying Clarke could have written better characters if he wanted to. Maybe he didn't have what it takes, but I don't miss it.

A book like "Childhood's end" is like watching a documentary. The characters are there just to move the plot and provide a point of view. Again, it's a style that I love.

What you call an "excuse", I call a scenario he created. He wrote a book where aliens didn't want to kill and slave us and he provided a good reason for it. It was satisfying and surprising for me.

Did all children become "x-men" at the same time? Or just a few children around the world? I don't really remember how it went.

>> No.4172394

>>4161329
Stanislaw Lem, A Perfect Vacuum.

>> No.4172427

Starship Troopers.

It got me back into reading during college.

>> No.4172442
File: 86 KB, 640x512, 1381301345895.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4172442

>>4172427
It wasn't at all what I expected after watching the movie first. Heinlein seems to actually believe in the facist ideas that the movie lampoons.

>> No.4172471

>>4172442
More or less. The intent is pretty much exactly opposite, Verhoeven is using the movie to satirize the points the book is making (I've heard that he barely even knew the book before he made the movie). Which is okay, the book isn't a masterwork or anything.

If you really want some good space-fascism, read Jack Vance - it's not explicit or anything, except in The Grey Prince (which is pretty much an apologia for the Rhodesian colonial government), but he has quite a few of those traits (and just for clarification here, I am not at all saying that Jack Vance was actually a fascist, nor is this meant to be a critique of his skill as a writer, which it could hardly be anyway)

>> No.4172536

>>4170775

Brain uploading taken to it's ultimate conclusion

>> No.4172537
File: 104 KB, 614x1024, Blue Mars.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4172537

>> No.4172584

Tough choice, probably something PKD

>> No.4172833

>>4164653
I three. Also, Permutation City was good.

>> No.4173238

>>4172537
Really? Blue Mars?

Red Mars was very good, until its half.
Green Mars was just too boring.
I've started Blue Mars and I had to put it down before page 100.

This trilogy is in bad need of a good editor. If you count all landscape descriptions it will probably amount to 400 pages. Fuck this shit.

>> No.4173253

Am I a nerd if I read science fiction?

>> No.4173337

>>4173253

Is this b8?

>> No.4173343

>>4173253
Yes.

>> No.4173349
File: 49 KB, 404x600, 404px-Illuminatus1sted.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4173349

The Illuminatus Trilogy

>> No.4173569

Lem has been mentioned so many times here, yet I have to do it again: Cyberiad.
Am I the only person who likes the new Solaris movie and hates the old one?
Other favorites would be
Nonstop and Hothouse by Aldiss
Brave New World by Huxley
War With Newts by Čapek

>> No.4174094

>>4171482
Christopher Lloyd quickly became a favourite sf author after reading that. It didn't seem to be anything spectacular, but it really stuck with me.

>> No.4174099

>>4174094
Uhh, Christopher Priest*.

>> No.4174101

>>4173349
My fucking nigger!

>> No.4174242

To whoever mentioned 'War With Newts' by Čapek - can we be bros?

Even if I am not all that enamoured of the new 'Solaris' movie (although it was better than Tarkovsky's shoddy effort, yeah).

I disagree about 'Hothouse' being a masterpiece. Too scientifically ludicrous - even at the time of publication - for me to get into, but admittedly a showy piece.

>> No.4175244

>>4161329
I'm with you
the experiment is also a great one.
and solaris

>> No.4175249

People don't like foundation?

>> No.4175253

>>4175249
haven't read it yet, but I'm pretty sure I would like it

>> No.4175263
File: 176 KB, 640x480, 1332273190254.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4175263

The Doomed City, strugatzky

anyone else here read this?
I think it is one of the best they've ever written.
At some parts I've nearly pissed myself from laughing

>> No.4175303

>>4175249
>People don't like foundation?
I don't. It's shit, even by YA standards. (Yes, you neckbeard, 'Foundation' is YA tripe.)

>> No.4175336

>>4175303
I bet you don't even like short stories, faggot

>> No.4175529

>>4175336
>I bet you don't even like short stories, faggot
I don't. I'm glad that genre finally died.

>> No.4175537

>>4175249
Most people like it. I do.

>> No.4175556

Slaughterhouse Five

so it goes.

>> No.4176461
File: 37 KB, 348x500, SYY.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4176461

Yukikaze.

There's something about it that just feels timeless. The occupation of Faery and the war with the JAM could've been constructed as a commentary on war, but that's more an unintentional element, second to the primary themes of the idea of human and inhuman; a conflict where man, with the aid of machine intelligences of its own design (albeit not necessarily of like mind), is seeking to keep at the very least a stalemate against an utterly incomprehensible and decisively inhuman alien... well, it's hard to say entity, or force, or just ascribe any sort of conceptualization to it.

But it's the machine intelligences that really got me. It left me feeling that the idea that we can totally predict and understand a true Artificial Intelligence is nothing more than human conceit; in fact, AI would be a misnomer for these things, which would operate according to their own perspective and world view conceptualizations that would lead them to act in ways incomprehensible to us humans. I left feeling that the field of AI may be best tackled not by trying to simply make an intelligent agent, but to foster the growth of... well, I'd use the term "digital organism." Whatever it will be, it's likely going to make Turing roll in his grave, being something obviously inhuman and yet very much alive... in some sense.

But yeah, Yukikaze.
And its followup Good Luck Yukikaze.
And I'd presume, if it would ever get translated, Unbroken Arrow Yukikaze.

Amazing shit.

>> No.4177096

Axiomatic or Crysal Express. Yes, I like short stories.

Scifi short stories > Scifi neverending sagas