[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 143 KB, 306x306, 051813_1008_mailboxmond2[1].png_w=470.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4149883 No.4149883[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

So... what do you think?

>> No.4149900

its better than 50 shades of grey

>> No.4149901

>>4149900
Is it erotica?

>> No.4149932

>>4149901
yes

>> No.4149965

Nothing, for I haven't read it.

>> No.4149967

>>4149883
I got the e-book on my phone. I hope it's good.

>> No.4149987

>>4149965
SPOILER ALBERT

it's about licking toilets

>> No.4150039

I saw this in tesco. wtf

>> No.4150091
File: 588 KB, 1289x1026, Juliette Society.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4150091

10/10

>> No.4150120

>>4150091
stopped at her listing powerful people in society. So, everyone then?

>> No.4150149

atleast she wasnt fucked so stupid she couldnt write the book.

>> No.4150154

>sasha grey

who cares? literally how do you manage to give a shit?

>>4150091
yep it's shit

>> No.4150171
File: 32 KB, 600x448, Sasha_toilet_licker.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4150171

>>4149883
Some argue that Marina Ann Hantzis is the smartest porn star alive. Vanessa Grigoriadis' Rolling Stone article "The Dirtiest Girl in the World," says that Ms. Hantzis "reads Nietzsche, likes it rough" and is "liberating women one gangbang at a time." She may not be able to close her mouth or open her eyes all the way, giving her face a permanent expression of mental retardation, but one only has to listen to her words of wisdom to realize the unbridled intelligence that lurks within her semen-stained mind.

For entertainment, she watches the films of Fassbinder, Herzog, Truffaut, Godard, Bertolucci, Mallick amongst other even more obscure artists. What are Ms. Hantzis' thoughts on these directors? In her opinion, what is the most striking thing about Bertolucci's cinematography? What common themes can be found within Herzog's films? Nobody knows, because Ms. Hantzis has never said anything about those films. Demonstrating that she subscribes to Desiderius Erasmus' "Philosophy of Name Dropping," all Ms. Hantzis does is say she's intelligent because she's read [Insert Smart Book Title/Philosopher Here] and watched [Insert Critically Acclaimed Movie/Director Here], but never actually demonstrates that she has an elementary understanding of the things she's read or watched. This proves that she is one of those hipsters who thinks that naming a bunch of obscure authors and artists give her credibility. We all know the type. Rather than discuss philosophies and avant-garde art Ms. Hantzis does like to talk about applying makeup, how to make your semen taste better, why racism is bad, and how to use an enema. What little she does say on the internet is often misspelled. Watch out, Sweden! Someone's coming after your Nobel Prizes!

>captcha "and gassable"

>> No.4150172

>>4150091
at least she has a decent vocabulary

>> No.4150177

>>4150120

all the dicks.

>> No.4150180

>>4150171
nice, i lol'd haha

>> No.4150197

>>4149883
bump for intelligent discussion

>> No.4150252

>>4150039

Tesco the gas station?

man, the only thing that would be worse than never being published would be being published on $3.00 gas station paperbacks

at least to my mind.

>> No.4150290

>>4150197
bamp bamp bamp

>> No.4150331

>>4150172
>implying those are actually her words
The bitch licks toilet bowls while taking 5 dicks in the ass.

>> No.4150335

>>4149883
waste of paper

>> No.4150353
File: 44 KB, 640x640, photo_big_square.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4150353

>>4150091
That prose :(

>> No.4150384

>>4149883
I recently saw this at a book store. It felt so weird to see the name "Sasha Grey" outside of my computer screen.

>> No.4150389
File: 24 KB, 387x353, 1342316632933.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4150389

>>4150091

>> No.4150520
File: 789 KB, 247x166, 1370938317543.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4150520

>>4150384

>> No.4150862

>>4149900
Why would you compare an erotic novel to 50 Shades of Grey, the novel about a Victorian era steel worker struggling to increase the working conditions of his plant?

>> No.4150870

>>4150331
Like you wouldn't if you could be paid for it too.

>> No.4150874

>>4150091
>oh no, I haven't said anything profound
>people will know I'm a dumbass!
>quick, think of something intelligent
>uh... uh...
>"Henry Kissinger once said..."
>that'll fool 'em

>> No.4151019

>>4150331
I can't wrap my head around the engineering feat of actually positioning five people to fit their dicks up a single hole.

>> No.4151023

Oh, let her have her fun. It was an entertaining first ten pages.

>> No.4151041

>>4150091

This is actually pretty bad.

>> No.4151069
File: 18 KB, 373x373, 1378660316134.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4151069

>>4150091
>the hoi polloi

>> No.4151079
File: 998 KB, 500x281, 1371967628449.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4151079

>Porn star.
>Writing a book.

>> No.4151148

>>4149883
It looks good with a party hat.

>> No.4151151

>>4150331

>she had kinky sex so that means she can't have a large vocabulary

What?

Anyway, the book is shit.

>> No.4151186

I'd read it for fun. Besides, we didn't get to read any of the erotic stuff. She said it's an erotic novel, which I understand is trash literature, but there's an art to writing good sex.

I'd be curious to see a porn-star's take on it.

She intrigues me because she seems to have an overlying grasp of where her pornstar career (and the acts therein) is situated in a broader context of gender roles and society-wide sexuality.

She also seems to fill a niche I'm not sure the porn industry is aware of: the classy, intelligent, yet disgustingly sexual woman; girl of my dreams.

It's not a role you can pull off easily-- it has to be genuine, since the guys who go for this tend to get off on genuineness and have a knack for spotting intellectual frauds.

>> No.4151503

>>4151186
>classy
Ya blew it.

>> No.4151680

>>4150039
Wait I haven't seen books sold in Tesco.

>> No.4152528
File: 153 KB, 590x417, 1378868227511.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4152528

>>4150091
Fucking awful.

>> No.4152536

>>4151151
the continous push of the dick on the roof of your mouth when face-fucked causes brain damage. it's science. similar to that torture where they let water drip drop by drop on your scalp

>> No.4152546

>>4150091
Oh man, it's already falling into the BDSM society tropes so prevalent in bad fanfiction.
Well, there's still hope I'll be able to get off on this.

>> No.4152549

Not any worse than anything else on the erotica market.

Erotica fucking sucks.

>> No.4152551

>>4150870
Not him, but I wouldn't. I have no idea where the idea comes from that anyone would do anything for some amount of money. I wouldn't lick a toilet, suck a dick, etc. for money. I don't want the money bad enough, and my life would go on normally without licking toilets for thousands of dollars. Not everybody is willing to do anything for money. That's an idea I've seen tossed around a lot, but I don't think it's very true.

>> No.4152563

>>4151186
>it has to be genuine
I wish it was, but it's about as genuine as her porn. I wish her porn was better, for that matter. She has an almost sarcastic and detached attitude in most of her videos, and it makes it very unpleasant. I want to watch a woman lick toilets while getting fucked and like it. Most of her videos turn into regular porn halfway through anyway. She doesn't seem very into the fetishes she displays, and it shows.

>that video where she wore a pig nose to get fucked
>no roleplay or anything, she takes it off halfway through and they just have regular sex
>dirty talk is pretty meh-tier
disappointment of the century.

>> No.4152570

>>4150870
not in front of cameras, buster

>> No.4152630

>>4151186
>since the guys who go for this tend to get off on genuineness and have a knack for spotting intellectual frauds.
well you don't seem to be very good at it and
>erotic novel, which I understand is trash literature
that's just categorical bullshit.

>> No.4152635

>>4150091

They call it the Juliette Society.

Go ahead. Bing it.

>> No.4152648
File: 20 KB, 350x350, im-so-above.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4152648

>>4152563
Ugh, really. I'm aware that porn is artificial. I don't need the stars to be detached so that I know while they're being tied up and fucked with a strap-on up the ass, that they get that it's just artifice, and this is all really fake, maaaaan.

>> No.4152703

that piece of shit wouldn't probably even be deemed publishable material if it wasn't because she built a reputation for sucking dicks. It's sad really. 'Celebrities' can decide to write a shity book anyday and still get published while others (that might have a lot more talent) depend only on the quality of their work and have to struggle with it.

>> No.4152714

>>4152703
You're right, but iI'm not so sure it's that bad. Is the only point to writing getting famous? The latter group you mentioned sounds like it might come out better having been forced to work hard at writing.

>> No.4152726
File: 312 KB, 888x1172, Harper Collins gave a book deal to a cave troll.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4152726

>>4152703
What the fuck are you rambling on about?