[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 39 KB, 310x390, d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4044936 No.4044936 [Reply] [Original]

Is there a country that can beat Russia in terms of literary merit?

>> No.4044940

Canada, Vietnam and New Zealand

>> No.4044941

USA

>> No.4044944

France

>> No.4044947

>>4044936

Equatorial Guinea

>> No.4044949

Finland

>> No.4044951
File: 47 KB, 604x402, 1315586699411.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4044951

>>4044941

>> No.4044954

Belgium comes to mind.

>> No.4044953

>>4044940
>>4044941
>>4044944
Care to give some names?

When I think about Russian literature, I think about

Dostoyevsky
Tolstoy
Gogol
Turgev
Nabokov
Bulgakov
Pushkin
Solzhenitsyn

>> No.4044955

>>4044953
Nabokov's best work is American literature.

>> No.4044963

>>4044955
IRL no one thinks about Nabokov

/lit/'s obsession with Nabokov is like /g/'s obsession with Richard Stallman

>> No.4044965

Lesotho.

>> No.4044966

>>4044963
lolno

>> No.4044967

>>4044941
Also China

>>4044953
Salinger, Toole, Pynchon (kek), Twain, Steinbeck, Hemingway

>> No.4044968

>>4044963
IRL no one thinks about books

>> No.4044970

>>4044967
>China
>that one guy who has read tao te ching and 2 other chinese works and pretends to know his shit
every thread

>> No.4044976

>>4044970
Why so cynical?

>> No.4044979

>>4044953
>Care to give some names?
Rabelais, Voltaire, Hugo, Stendhal, Balzac, Flaubert, Maupassant, Baudelaire, Rimbaud, Lautreamont, Zola, Proust, Gide, Celine

>> No.4044984

France is stacked, they dont have the most Nobel Lits for nothing
Proust
Voltaire
DeSade
Satre
Camus
Celine

Verne

>> No.4044989 [DELETED] 

>>4044953
all mentioned and daumal and henny jahnn and huysmans and zurn and breton and his gang of assholes

france is top dog

>> No.4044993

Ireland.

>> No.4044996

>>4044936
Ireland. It's always Ireland.

>> No.4045002

>>4044936
US, France, England, Ireland, Argentina, Japan, South Africa.

>> No.4045012

>>4044936
India.
Every human problem that has been conceived and answer given to has been written about in India.

>> No.4045035

Iceland

>> No.4045039

>>4045012
>not enough cattle raids for genre content
>too few boats in the flood
>not enough baby eating questions or answers
>lacks representative bicycle realism and/or surrealism
Still Ireland.

>> No.4045041
File: 72 KB, 400x316, inferno.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4045041

>>4044936
Italy:

Virgil;
Ovid;
Dante Alighieri;
Francesco Petrarca;
Giovanni Boccaccio;
Lorenzo de' Medici;
Ludovico Ariosto;
Niccolò Machiavelli;
Torquato Tasso;
Giovan Battista Marino;
Alessandro Manzoni;
Giacomo Leopardi;
Ugo Foscolo;
Giovanni Verga;
Umberto Saba;
Giuseppe Ungaretti;
Luigi Pirandello;
Primo Levi;
Italo Svevo;
Italo Calvino;
Pier Paolo Pasolini.

>> No.4045057

Britain, Italy, France and Germany all have richer literary traditions than Russia. Russia has a cluster of brilliant social realists in the mid–late 19th Century and that's pretty much it. Hell, even USA has more variety.

>> No.4045122

>>4044984
>France is stacked, they dont have the most Nobel Lits for nothing

Ok, ok, i love french works but please don't use nobel as something to give value tu your opinion, it's just a recent prize.

>> No.4045140

>>4044979
>>4044984
France wins.

>> No.4045145

Russia -> XIX and XX centuries.

So yes: France, England, Spain, Germany and Italy.

>> No.4045149

>>4045041
Shit. This guy has a point.

>> No.4045151

>>4044936
>>4044936
USA

Faulkner
Melville
Steinbeck
Hemingway
Hawthrone
Whitman
Dickinson
O'Connor
Pynchon
McCarthy

>> No.4045155

>>4045151
Also Nabokov

>> No.4045157

>>4045151
You forgot Eliot, Twain, Dos Passos, and James.

>> No.4045166

>there are people in /lit/ that read american books
Really?

>> No.4045168

>>4045151
I don't understand.
These authors are nothing special.

>> No.4045170

>>4045151
and dfw

>> No.4045172

>>4045168
ok please stop posting

>> No.4045176

>>4045157
I was going to bring up Eliot but then there is the whole "British Subject" thing since he moved to the UK pretty young.

>> No.4045179

>>4045166
99% here are Americans. That's why Hemingway and others are so fucking discussed on /lit/.

American litarature doesn't have that weight in the History of literature. But it's still good.

>> No.4045184
File: 211 KB, 323x810, britain strong.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4045184

Ahem.

Shakespeare
Milton
Blake
Chaucer
Spenser
Marlowe
Jonson
Keats
Donne
Wordsworth
Tennyson
Byron
Shelley
Shelley
Coleridge
Pope
Browning
Swinburne
Dryden
Fielding
Rosetti
Rosetti
Burns
Hopkins
Austen
Dickens
Hardy
Defoe
Woolf
Brontë
Brontë
Brontë
Eliot
Chesterton
More
Bacon
Johnson
Boswell
Gibbon

>> No.4045192 [DELETED] 

1910's Portugal.

>> No.4045198

>>4045184
>tfw we sent a poet to declare our independence from you
Ireland. Always.

>> No.4045195

>>4045184
Any book set in Victorian England or dealing with British high society is unbelievably boring and unreadable.

>> No.4045199

>>4045184
Also Orwell & Huxley (even if you don't like them they are influential)

>> No.4045200
File: 500 KB, 987x766, working class scum.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4045200

>>4045195

>> No.4045207

>>4045199
Don't forget Tolkien and H.G. Wells.

And Forster, Greene, Waugh, Wodehouse and Shaw are three more names worth mentioning, I think.

Britain kind of has every base covered.

>> No.4045208

>>4045184
>dem Bronte
lol nope, only one is ok.

>> No.4045210

>>4045207
Oh, and Lewis Carroll. And arguably Conrad, Sako, Eliot and Auden.

>> No.4045212

>>4045210
>Sako

Saki*

>> No.4045216

>>4045184
that list isn't as impressive when you take out all the boring poets
I could list a bunch of Beats and Imagists but everyone would call me a fag

>> No.4045220

>>4045216
Yeah, Ginsburg is totally the same as Keats.

You uncultured swine.

>> No.4045223

>>4045207
>Shaw
>not Irish

>> No.4045230

>>4045223
You're right, sorry. He did live in Britain for the majority of his life though.

>> No.4045243

>>4045184
>implying anything good that came out of Britain wasn't derivative of the classics.

>> No.4045253

russian lit is mainly just hacks with a political agenda. where exactly is the merit in that if you don't care about social causes like race, gender, politics?

>> No.4045258

D.H. Lawrence, Thomas De Quincey, Ford Madox Ford, Anthony Trollope, James Hogg, Matthew Lewis, Arthur Conan Doyle, Ian Fleming, Rudyard Kipling and Henry Fielding are some more great and influential Brits that haven't been mentioned yet. It really is no content.

>> No.4045261
File: 1.13 MB, 2589x3665, wildeboy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4045261

>>4045195
>Any book set in Victorian England or dealing with British high society is unbelievably boring and unreadable.
Ireland says no.

>> No.4045269

>>4045253
this

>> No.4045262

>>4045258
>It really is no content.

I'll say.

>> No.4045270

>>4045258
>It really is no content.

That should be "no contest" lol.

>> No.4045274
File: 380 KB, 560x404, robot_love.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4045274

Every major European country has a decent list of authors to offer.
Even the smaller ones have great writers of beautiful, moving literature - they just don't receive as much attention.
When it comes to Eastern lit, I'm a little bit less well-informed but Korea, China, and Japan have all produced excellent writers.
America, though much younger than the rest, has also birthed some powerhouse authors and works.

In terms of my favorites, I'd rank them like this:
America (muh cultural bias)
Great authors: O'Conner, Vonnegut, Pynchon, Hemingway, etc

France (muh existentialism)
Great authors: Camus, Celine, Voltaire, Flaubert, etc

Russia (muh doorstoppers)
Great authors: Bulgakov, Zamyatin, Dostoevsky, Tolstoy

>> No.4045275

Sweden.

>> No.4045277

French lit is edgy bullshit. Race of utter degenerates.

>> No.4045279
File: 30 KB, 350x221, 350px-Waterhouse_decameron.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4045279

>>4045041
>>4045149
These + Galileo Galilei and Leonardo Da Vinci.

>> No.4045282

>>4045274
>America
>Younger than Joyce's Ireland

>> No.4045287

1. Greece
2. Italy/Ancient Rome
3. Great Britain
(big gap)
4. Germany
5. France

Don't even try to argue.

>> No.4045290

"Classic" American fiction is overrated. American Poetry from different movements is god tier, though

>> No.4045295

>>4045287
>not enough neolithic
Ireland

>> No.4045296
File: 732 KB, 500x350, backtopol.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4045296

>>4045277
>degenerates

You know the drill.

>> No.4045299

Russian Existentialism > French Existentialism

>> No.4045304

>>4045287
lol Germany. Fuck outta here. Take away Goethe and who's left aside from a few poets?

>> No.4045306

>>4044936
Realism is so bad. Russian literature won't be remembered 100 years from now.

>> No.4045329

>>4045258
>Arthur Conan Doyle, Ian Flemin
......... the list could go on

>> No.4045335

>>4045304
Schiller, Hölderlin, Novalis, Hoffmann, Büchner, Mann, Kleist, Heine, Schlegel, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, Hegel, Döblin, Brecht, Wedekind, Hesse, Jünger, Remarque, Hauptmann, Grass, Müller, Sebald, Böll...

>> No.4045341

>>4045299
mmhmm

>> No.4045342

>>4045335

>schiller

jesus christ how could he forget.

>> No.4045344

>>4045216
Why are Americans so pleb? Your cook is fastfood as well as your literature and all your culture.

Wondrous literature brings jealousy

>> No.4045347

>>4045335
I implied the poets, but why did you include philosophers? Philosophers have nothing to do with this thread.

>> No.4045348

>>4045344

Nobody but the yanks know.

>> No.4045379

>>4045347
philosophers can have literary merit. nietzsche and schopenhauer in particular were very literary writers and had a profound influence on subsequent literature. i also count plato for the greeks and cicero for the romans etc.

>> No.4045389

>>4045379
I don't disagree, but it's not typically classed with literature and the thread so far has been devoid of philosophy up until that post. If we included it, it'd probably change a bunch of people's votes.

>> No.4045660

>>4044936
imo, 4:

greece, india, israel, england.

>> No.4045664

>>4044984
sartre and camus are not great literature, nor de sade.

>> No.4045667

>>4045168

>melville, dickinson and whitman
>nothing special

>> No.4045673

china. having the oldest literature counts for nothing, apparently.

>> No.4045678

>>4045335
haven't read most of those. but sebald isn't very good and hesse is average

>> No.4045679

What are the chances anybody in this thread has actually read something of the names they are arguing over, for or against? Jesus Christ...

>> No.4045682

>>4045287
britain > italy

>> No.4045683

>>4045389
of course philosophy is literature

>> No.4045691

>>4045274
>O'Conner, Vonnegut, Pynchon, Hemingway,

Those are strange picks to me. I wouldn't have any of them as Great. I'd take: Whitman, Melville, Dickinson, Hawthorne, Burroughs.

>> No.4045693

>>4045691
Burroughs is a stranger pick.

>> No.4045696

>>4045683
Not typically, no.

>> No.4045707

France or England

>> No.4045722

Ireland
>joyce
>beckett
>wilde
>swift
>yeats

>> No.4045728
File: 1.99 MB, 214x162, have it your way.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4045728

Bukowski is considered American right?

>> No.4045733

Who are Chinas most significant literary figures? I guess Confucius, Mencius, Chuang Tzu and Lao Tzu and people like that?

>> No.4045739

>>4045733
The people who wrote the Three (Four) Great Chinese novels should be included too. I am busy right now and don't remember the names, but google should help.

>> No.4046282
File: 6 KB, 384x256, flag-hungarystate-lg.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4046282

>>4044936
Hungary, is nearly as good I'd say. Although the fact that Hungarian can't be very effectively translated (like most languages I guess) sort of takes from the literature.
I really like:
Imre Madách
Attila Jozsef
Miklós Radnóti
Dezső Kosztolányi
Endre Ady
Sándor Petőfi
János Arany
Zsigmond Móricz
Géza Gárdonyi
István Örkény
Bálint Balassi

I suppose what country you think has the best literature is sort of subjective though.

>> No.4046313

>>4046282
lol

>> No.4046338

>>4046313
How do you mean?

>> No.4046343

>>4046338
the thread is about naming good writers, not namedropping all the writers you know from your mother land. i found your delusion funny

>> No.4046346

>>4044936
Britain, France, USA, Greece, Italy (if you count Rome in that), and arguably China. Russia is still top tier though (and Dostoyevsky is god-tier).

>> No.4046347

>>4044936
Nope. Russia wins. Saying this as a Britfag.

>>4044953
Don't forget:
Gorky
Shalamov
Grossman

>> No.4046351

>>4044951
The blonde girl looks like she's yawning.

>> No.4046355

>>4044996
This.

>> No.4046358

>>4045279
Neither of whom are of *literary* merit. I agree with the post you're responding to though.

>> No.4046363

>>4045296
Seriously, what a divide-and-conquer fag.

>> No.4046478

>>4046343
How do you figure that the authors that I listed aren't good writers? I'm also not from Hungary.

>> No.4046483

>>4045041
>Italy
>Virgil
>Ovid

>> No.4046503

>no one mentioned Brazil

>> No.4046511

>>4046503
Why would they?

>> No.4046515

>>4046511
Because their literature is incredible.

>> No.4046542

>>4046515
Care to back your statement up?

>> No.4046543

>>4044967
+Henry James

>> No.4046544

USA
Whitman
Dickenson
Twain
the beats
Hemingway
Vonnegut
DFW

>> No.4046589

>>4044963 You must be new.

>> No.4046616

>>4046343
>Implying Jozsef Attila isn't the best poet of the first half of the 20th century

>> No.4046621
File: 198 KB, 1024x887, Hungary.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4046621

>> No.4046630

>>4046544
>not listing Melville

>> No.4046635

>>4044963
Having studied literature, I can say with certainty that you're wrong. /lit/'s obsession with Nabokov has probably stemmed from their literature professor's obsession with him.

>> No.4046659

England, Ireland, USA, China,Italy Argentina and France.

>> No.4046686

Italy.

Russia's got a bunch of pleb shit.

>> No.4046719

>>4045168
>Faulkner, Melville, Steinbeck, Whitman, Dickens
>nothing
dear fucking god, your privilege to have a valid opinion has been revoked. You can not like them, but for chrissake don't be so fucking stupid to think that they are bad because you're retarded ass can't comprehend a goddamn fucking thing.
holy fucking shit.

>> No.4046730

>>4044936
Dostoyevsky is highly overrated

>> No.4046736

>>4046282
>>4046621
I keep this image.

Great post. Thanks.

>> No.4046741

>>4046730
No, Tolstoy is.

>> No.4046742

>>4044936
Yes, lots. /lit/ just circle jerks all over the Russians because they read two great books by two different authors who happened to be russian.

>> No.4046743

>>4046741
Him too.

>> No.4046779

>>4046742
What an ill-informed opinion. Russia has produced many of the greatest poets and novelists, a statement that stands even if Tolstoy and Dostoevsky are excluded. There's Chekhov, Tyutchev, Pushkin, Bely, Turgenev, Gogol, Lermontov, Zhukovsky, Tsvetaeva, and countless others, many of whom are lesser known yet still of similar (or in some cases, better) quality. I think the UK is the only country that can compete with Russia.

>> No.4046803

>>4046779
see
>>4046742
/lit/ is proving your point

>> No.4047271

Russia was relevnat only between 1850-1950

>> No.4047283

>>4045041
>Virgil
>Ovid
It is Virgilius and Ovidius, dammit!

Sweden is pretty based:
Verner von Heidenstam
Fredrik Ström
August Strindberg
Ola Hansson
Selma Lagerlöf
Göran Tunström
Fabian Månsson:

>Sedan tiotals år hade det svenska riksrådet mest i var socken och stad sett växa upp sticklingar av sitt eget brödraskap. Det var i dessa gillen allsköns lackare, smilare och herrehyllare, som varken brydde sig om sitt eller de sinas väl, bara de fick slicka frälsegunstens solsken några timmar … narrar havande med fåfänga och högfärd …. Små rävar höljda i dubbla skinn … åsnor som voro glada om de fick fara med på herrarnas fester

From the trilogy Sanckte Eriks gård.

>> No.4047284

>>4047271
What about Viktor Pelevin?

>> No.4047286

>>4047284
Or Vladimir Sorokin?

>> No.4047299

>>4047284
>>4047286
They are highly irrelevant

>> No.4047307

Ancient Greece.

>> No.4047312

>>4047307
>literary merit

>> No.4047313

>>4047312
Then its Amuruca.

>> No.4047314

>>4045041
>this

also, the list goes on

>> No.4047320

>>4045678
>Hesse
>average

pick one

>> No.4047322

>>4045682
how?

>> No.4047330

>>4045379
>nietzche
>literary merit
he merely tried

>> No.4047359

>>4045140

Yeah i know. Gee, if homer and aristotle had just worked on their prose a bit more im sure they might have won a nobel prize. They just didn't put any effort in

>> No.4047364 [DELETED] 

>western literature
>literary merit
they don't go together

>> No.4047400

>>4047364

>>>/pol/

>> No.4047406 [DELETED] 

>>4047400
I'm not going there!

>> No.4047408

>>4047406

>>>/fa/

>> No.4047420
File: 15 KB, 225x225, flute.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4047420

ok, so far, we all agreed that russian, france, italy and ireland are pretty cool, german has a lot of value but not so much literary merit in general, england is kind of mediocre and usa basically a joke

what about spain? any value in general except for a few big names? what about south america any country standing out or just some value spread around them?

>> No.4047592

>>4046282
In the 20th Century (and beyond), Hungarian lit is certainly superior to Russian lit.

>> No.4047663

>>4044949
EBIN ::::::::::::DDDD

>> No.4047677

UK USA FRANCE

>> No.4047684

>>4046542
Not him, but Machado de Assis is truly brilliant and that's all I read from Brazil. I mean really above just "good".

>> No.4047685

>>4047684
Rosa and Lispector are also literary giants

>> No.4047688

>>4047299
Please elaborate.

>> No.4047691

>>4047420
>ok, so far, we all agreed that ... england is kind of mediocre

I didn't get that from this thread at all. Seems to me that Britain actually has the most depth in numbers and variety.

>> No.4047696

>>4047684
>Not him, but Machado de Assis is truly brilliant
Liar. You are Machado de Assis, aren't you?

>> No.4047699 [DELETED] 

Germany, if we count philosophy as literature.

>> No.4047712

Many of the greatest authors to have written in German were Swiss or Austrian.

>> No.4047754

>>4047691
true that, the problem is that the guy who namedropped a million english authors put a lot of mediocrity to bloat the list, but after filtering all the shit there's still a lot of great authors that stand strong

>> No.4047850

>>4046282
lol
list of names no one outside Hungary has ever heared of

>> No.4047858

>>4046478
if they were good writers, people would know them. Russian is harder to translate but everybody knows who Esenin is.

>> No.4047871

>>4047420
Llosa, Neruda, Cervantes

>> No.4047966

>>4047871
those are from 3 different countries

>> No.4047984

>>4047754
The writers named in >>4045184 are all canonised, and it's not even an exhaustive list.

>> No.4047991

>>4047858
>if they were good writers, people would know them

who do you mean by 'people'? there are people who don't know who dostoyevsky is. i assure that the people 'in the know', know those hungarian writers. hungary is a literary powerhouse.

>> No.4048000

>>4047850
I've heard of three of them (plus Krasznahorkai and Nádas) and I'm not Hungarian or even particularly well read.

>> No.4048041 [DELETED] 

>>4044936
Every country ever. SAGE

>> No.4050012

>>4046635
No, no one outside of these pedophile forums mentions Nabokov. If your literature professor was a pedophile, I think you wasted your money.

>> No.4050242

>>4044963
Untrue. B4 I found /lit/. Five seperate people told me to read it. Honestly, I got through 55 pages and threw it away.

>> No.4050302

>>4050242
why

>> No.4050308

>>4047420
Spain has a novel that I think is one of the best selling of time, or best selling for its genre, the one about the man who rides the donkey.

>> No.4050350

God Tier Literature Countries:
Russia, USA, UK, Japan, Germany

>> No.4050355

>India
>China
>Greece
>France
>England
>Germany
>Russia
>Every single other fucking country

Jesus Christ, guys. Do you see the pattern forming?

>> No.4050358

>>4050350
>Japan
>but no France
Weeaboos never cease to embarrass themselves

>> No.4050359

>>4050355
>China
Why is that?

>> No.4050413

>>4050308
shrek?

>> No.4050416

>>4050355
>Do you see the pattern forming?
No.

>> No.4050464

>>4050355

Only aryans can write good books?

>> No.4050490

>>4050308
lmao

>> No.4050546

America.

>Melville
>Hawthorne
>Emerson
>Poe

Etc. These are pretty fucking good authors. I love Dostoyevsky though. The Brothers Karamazov remains a monument. It was instrumental in taking my fedora off my silly head and making me a Christian.

>> No.4050547

>>4050546
>trying to fit into the /lit/ hivemind this hard

>> No.4050551

>>4050547

You think so? Because that's not my idea of what /lit/ likes as a whole. At all.

>> No.4050583

>>4050355

>Do you see the pattern forming?
No

>> No.4050588

>>4050547

I thought /lit/ always made fun of the idea of america have a solid literary tradition

>> No.4050590
File: 22 KB, 423x283, ear-training-intervals-tricks-1.1-800x800.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4050590

>>4050546
>The Brothers Karamazov
>making you a non-russian christian
>missing the point

>> No.4050865

Hungary of course.

>>4046282
Not listing Nobel prize winner Imre Kertész

>> No.4050896

>>4050865
>Kertész Calls Schindler's List "kitsch"
I regard as kitsch any representation of the Holocaust that is incapable of understanding or unwilling to understand the organic connection between our own deformed mode of life and the very possibility of the Holocaust.

Seriously, what does this even mean, besides being 2edgy4 Spielberg?

>> No.4051172

>>4050896
what is it that you dont understand in that sentence?

>> No.4051416
File: 1.61 MB, 230x172, 1370241245078.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4051416

>tfw when russian
>tfw growing up and having russian literature classes in school, trying to analize classics beloved by all civilized people
>tfw being too young, too stupid, 2kewl4skewl to get the messages and lessons from great books, appreciate rich writing in my own rich language

Good thing I'm not a pikey (at least I think I'm not) and reread everything worth reading from classic russian literature when got older

>> No.4051425

>>4050546

>becoming Christian from TBK

Moron.

>> No.4051428

>>4051172
>incapable of understanding
What in Schindler's List is incapable and unwilling?
What is "the organic connection between our own deformed mode of life and the Holocaust?"
What is meant by Kertesz's phrase "our deformed mode of life" period?

>> No.4051678

>>4051416
>Good thing I'm not a pikey (at least I think I'm not)

Does your home have wheels? If not, I don't think you have anything to worry about m8.

>> No.4051693

>>4050012
Lolita isn't Nabokov's only novel.

>> No.4051697

>>4051693
but it is the only good one.

>> No.4051722

For a small country like The Netherlands we have good lit.
>Multatuli
>Couperus
>Nescio
>Reve
>Hermans
>Mulisch

I'm not saying we can compete with the big boys though

>> No.4051725

>>4051722
nooteboom

>> No.4051726

>>4047858
>if they were good writers, people would know them
That's a pretty stupid thing to say. If Anglophones don't know certain writers, they're not good? Just look at the list of Nobel Prize lit winners and you'll see most of the non-Anglos are obscure in the Anglophone world.

America is not the world

>> No.4051727

>>4051697
okay, philistine

>> No.4051815
File: 25 KB, 1100x733, het verdriet van belgie.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4051815

>>4044954

>> No.4051820
File: 293 KB, 480x480, SM1ND.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4051820

all you faggots rating russian literature without knowing russian :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDdddddddddddddddddddddddd

>> No.4051824

>>4051820
>подразумевая мы не знаем России

>> No.4051840

>>4050302
>why?
Why did I stop reading it? Well, I know everybody disagrees here and is going to give me shit, but...
1. I don't care for his prose. I find it neither beautiful nor compelling. I find it droll.
2. I'm uninterested in the subject matter. I know hurrdedurr seperate the author from his work, but Nabokov seems like he likes and justifies his characters behaviour, as well as gives hh's innate urges a backstory.
3. I believe personally that it's predatory. It's a story depicting the life of a child molester and shows Lolita to be a precocious participant in the relationship. Child molesters always justify themselves like she wanted it or she has urges too, and it sickens me to think about it. Like a 12 or even 16 year old has any idea about anything at all the way someone older than 25 does. It's retarded and I don't need to read about Nabokov's secret desire to have sex with children.

>> No.4051875

>>4051840
Correction
>I don't need to read about Nabokov's secret desire to have sex with children
,especially if it's poorly written.

>> No.4051903

>>4044936
gross or per capita?

>> No.4053447

>>4051840
go back to mumsnet, fucking retard.

>> No.4053465

France:
Baudelaire, Rimbaud, Verlaine, Valery, Flaubert, Balzac, Zola, Voltaire, Rosseau, Tournier, Victor Hugo, Verne, Camus, Dumas, Moliere, Proust, Maupassant, Perrault, Sade, Stendhal, Gide, Cocteau, Céline, Chautebriand, Apollinaire, Rabelais, Genet, Lamartine, Montaigne

>> No.4053479

>>4045306
What makes you say that with so much certainty? That seems like a huge assumption to make, based upon very little.
What would lead you to believe that Tolstoy/Dostoevsky/Turgev etc are to be forgotten? You said Russian lit in general won't be remembered, which I think is an erroneous statement. Maybe Russian realism will lose popularity, but tone down your implications a bit, or explain yourself.

>> No.4053522

>>4051697
No, just his most popular. Pale Fire, The Gift, and Ada are all "good".

>> No.4053529

>>4053522
pale fire is not good. mildly amusing at best.

>> No.4053536

>>4053529
A shallow reading of the book might produce your opinion, I'll concede.

>> No.4053537

Germany: Goethe

/thread

>> No.4053539

>>4053536
don't worry, i got all the schizophrenia crap, it just didn't move me at all. nabokov's just a show off, his work has no genuine emotional core. when he does try to insert a bit of pathos it just comes across as hopelessly forces, like he's just going through the motions. i appreciate that he moved the form forward but i don't enjoy his books.

>> No.4053540

>>4053539
Fair enough.

>> No.4053571

So I think from this thread, the only definitive statement that we've come to make is that Russian, American, French, British, Irish, German, Italian, and Chinese literature are all the best countries, Netherlands is okay, and only Hungarians care about Hungary.

>> No.4053618

>>4045253
Yeah, if only Tolstoy had turned his attention to the struggling urban black women of mother Russia. A pressing issue then as it is today.

>> No.4053648

>>4053571
I've seen no proof that China can measure up to the great European powers. I think people are just name-dropping them to seem cosmopolitan and clued-up.

>> No.4053672

>>4053648
>I've seen no proof that China can measure up to the great European powers. I think people are just name-dropping them to seem cosmopolitan and clued-up.
Eh, you've not read any great Chinese novels, seeing as you don't read Chinese and nobody ever translated them properly.

>> No.4053740

>>4053672
i don't think it's possible in any conceivable way to translate logosyllabic writing into a phonographic language.

taking that in account i have only read a translation of Water Margin (or Outlaws of the Marsh or whatever).

That being said probably not even modern chinese readers can extract all the value from a text like that without having studied old language, i guess it depends to what degree has chinese evolved lately

>> No.4053742

>>4053672
>>4053740
i guess you could say the same to a lesser degree about russian or arabic writings, all of the translations probably lose a lot

>> No.4053782

>>4045274
does doorstopper mean long book?

>> No.4053796

>>4053540
lel this guy brought literally no arguments for why that book is good, and only gambled on receiving no replies

>> No.4054002

>>4053740
>i don't think it's possible in any conceivable way to translate logosyllabic writing into a phonographic language.
What? That's absolutely retarded.

>That being said probably not even modern chinese readers can extract all the value from a text like that without having studied old language, i guess it depends to what degree has chinese evolved lately
You have to study old language if you want to read Chinese, like it or not. Modern Chinese writing preserves all sorts of ancient linguistical features. (This is by design, to make reading old texts easier.)

>>4053742
Anyways, to get back on topic: I read English and Russian natively, French fluently and I can struggle through Chinese with a dictionary. I'd rather be reading a Chinese novel than a French one, no contest about it. For one, it seems like almost everything written in Chinese is humorous and/or irreverent, while writing funny books in French seems to be forbidden by law. For another, Chinese writing has a way of putting across intensely vivid imagery in a super-condensed fashion, while in French, the more verbose your writing is, the more brownie points you score.

The point is that there's a lot of very good stuff out there which you're deprived of, as a monolingual English speaker, because of language barriers. English is _not_ the universal language, lots of very goods things are never and will never be properly translated into English.

>> No.4054065

>>4047858
if you're going from Russian->English, Russian is certainly easier to translate.

>> No.4054076

>>4054065
Easier than what?

>> No.4054094

>>4054076
Hungarian. Russian and English are at least in the same language family.

>> No.4054104
File: 80 KB, 492x559, TARD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4054104

>>4054094
>Russian and English are at least in the same language family.

>> No.4054106

>ctrl+f Artaud
>0 results

I'm disappoint and I'm not even french

>> No.4054108

>>4054094
lol

>> No.4054116

>>4054104
English and Russian are both Indo-European. Hungarian is not.

>> No.4054117

Britain.

>> No.4054118

>>4054106
The Theater and Its Double was kind of disappointing actually.

>> No.4054120

>>4054104
>>4054108
see
>>4054116

>> No.4054121

>>4054120
lol

>> No.4054126

>>4054120
Lol

>> No.4054141

>>4054118
Heliogabale is completely different, maybe it's more your thing

also 0 results for Bataille why

>> No.4054148

>>4054094
First of all, not really.

Second of all, that doesn't matter. Russian and English have completely different "mental frameworks". English is one of the quintessential Standard Average European languages, while Russian evolved in isolation from other PIE languages and works with completely different and very unique ways.

Thirdly, Russian literature has a long-standing and important tradition of using colloqualisms, dialect, and double-entendre (of the punnish, not sexual kind). That makes translating a big pain in the ass.

>> No.4054163

>>4054148
You probably know more than I do. I was just thinking that because English and Russian both evolved from PIE and Hungarian did not, that English and Russian are more similar than English and Hungarian. (Even though I agree that English and Russian are still very different).

Also, I don't that you could call English 'quintessential Standard Average European.' What's your basis for that?

>> No.4054175

>>4047850
Petofi is pretty well known in Europe (Nietzsche actually wrote music to some of his poems before he started with philosophy) and so is the play the Tragedy of Man. As well is the poet Attila Jozsef who Ted Hughes described as one of his favourite poets, ugy hogy edd meg a faszom

>> No.4054189

>>4054163
>You probably know more than I do. I was just thinking that because English and Russian both evolved from PIE and Hungarian did not, that English and Russian are more similar than English and Hungarian.
Language families are based on having similar vocabulary, while ease of translation depends mostly on having similar grammar.

Languages become similar grammatically from language contact, not from being in the same language family.

>Also, I don't that you could call English 'quintessential Standard Average European.' What's your basis for that?
'Standard Average European' is a linguistic term, a particular sprachbund that is pervasive in Western (and most of Eastern) Europe.

See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Average_European

BTW, Hungarian seems to be somewhat closer to English, grammatically, than Russian is.

>> No.4054207

>>4054189
not that person, but Hungarian grammar is pretty drastically different than English grammar

>> No.4054255

>>4054207
>not that person, but Hungarian grammar is pretty drastically different than English grammar
The point is that Russian grammar is even more drastically different from English than Hungarian.

>> No.4054366

India has been mentioned a few times: care to recommend some novels from indian authors?

>> No.4054368

>>4054255
>The point is that Russian grammar is even more drastically different from English than Hungarian.
No it isn't.

>> No.4054375

>>4054189
>Language families are based on having similar vocabulary
Did whoever told you this follow it up by telling you translating the word gullible is a good benchmark of relatedness?

>> No.4054479

>>4053447
See you on Dateline, faggot.

>> No.4054620

>>4054189
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Average_European
This link (which may not be accurate) says that English, Slavic languages, and even Hungarian are considered part of the sprachbund, with english being the most central member.

>Language families are based on having a similar vocabulary
partly, yes, but
>Languages become similar grammatically from language contact, not from being in the same language family
I'd say both are true, depending on how you word it. All IE languages started as one, and they gradually developed different grammars over time.

>Hungarian seems to be somewhat closer to English, grammatically, than Russian is.

At this point, Im accepting that you're right, I would just like to know what makes you come to that decision.