[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 62 KB, 1344x1052, PTDC0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3700558 No.3700558 [Reply] [Original]

Discuss.

>> No.3700574

>>3700558
Faulty

>> No.3700572

counted to twice no? unless image is 3d in which case retarded to look at from 2d perspective no? even if 3d is 6 no. either way this silly, no?

>> No.3700599

>>3700558

It shows that set theory cannot be used as a foundation for arithmetic.

>> No.3700621

I don't know what I'm looking at in the first place.

>> No.3700634 [DELETED] 

>>3700558

You only need to look at the fact that two raindrops traveling down the window pane on a path collision when joined form one raindrop!

Proof that one plus one equals one!

>> No.3700641

>>3700621

Frege, Russell, Whitehead et al tried to show that the foundation of mathematics was logic (specifically set-theory). They maintained that numbers are indexical to the world through sets. This shows that counting sets of 2 and 2 can equal 4 as can counting sets of 2 and 2 and 2. The meaning of which is that set-theory is not the foundation of arithmetic.

>> No.3700644

that image is stupid as fuck
the second (circled) is 1+1=2 not 2+2+2=4

>> No.3700645

I see nothing wrong.
one two
one two
one two
four points

>> No.3700665
File: 30 KB, 1041x466, untitled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3700665

deal with it

>> No.3700670

>>3700665
What about diagonals?

>> No.3700678
File: 17 KB, 480x328, duck4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3700678

>>3700558

"You only need to look at the figure to see that a duck is also a rabbit."

>> No.3700680

>>3700670
go for it

>> No.3700698
File: 135 KB, 1163x470, herpderp.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3700698

>>3700670
>>3700680

>> No.3700737
File: 15 KB, 736x692, Witty on Math.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3700737

Discuss

>> No.3700747
File: 81 KB, 1344x517, 6666666.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3700747

What do I win?

>> No.3700758

That's wrong, though. The last picture should be "I only need to look at figure two to see that 2+1+1=4"

>> No.3700776

>>3700747
Un bicchiere di nutella.

>> No.3700783

>>3700758

Wittgensteins critiques on the foundation of math are famous for being shitty. Look at his argument with Turing for more examples.

>> No.3700815
File: 6 KB, 189x267, 1363234905050.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3700815

>>3700558
I may be quite wrong, but shouldn't that be "is" four, not "are" four?

>> No.3700817

>>3700783
your arrogance is distgusting. i work around arrogant people all day but i dont mid because they all have a phd, know what theyre doing and thus have the right to be arrogant on their field. you, however havent got the slightest clue what youre talking about. youre a faggot on the internet. think about this, please, i honestly hope this isnt what youre like in real life.

>> No.3700837

>>3700817
>respecting people just because they have a phd

>> No.3700845
File: 55 KB, 1344x598, manipulatives.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3700845

>>3700558
I think that people loose context of numbers. Numbers need a physical manipulative to have meaning. This obviously is just a little mind trick.

The problem is that we are taught numbers in a mechanical way without really focusing on the reality they are used to represent.

we often lose touch with the "common sense" of numbers.

>> No.3700856

>>3700837
>respecting anonymous people on the internet

>> No.3700867

>>3700558
circle the other two as well and it's 2+2+2+2=4

>> No.3700873

>>3700837
well, i actually do respect people for their phd if i know what their thesis is about or sometimes even just what field it is. why is that stupid?
maybe youll gain respect for these things once youve reached that stage in your education yourself.
also, this thread is fucking retarded. how many of you ignorant faggots have read the principia mathematica and fully understood it? how many of you have read zermelo, peano and gödel? just let this thread die, you dont have anything meaningful to say.

>> No.3700876

>>3700817

>implying the person who wrote >>3700783 is not a PhD ABD.

>> No.3700877

>Set theory
>Arithmetic
I... what?

>> No.3701113

>have 4 oranges
>add 2 you already had
still have 4 oranges

>> No.3701172

>>3700873
In our time people want to know everything or should I describe it as "want others to know that they know everything". As the result you get people talking about shit they don't know about. But, who am I talking to, you already know that.

>> No.3701187

1/0=∞
therefore
∞*0=1

2/0=∞
therefore
∞*0=2
therefore
1=∞*0=2
therefore 1=2

>> No.3701196

>>3701187
>1/0=∞
Wrong.

>> No.3701201

>>3701196
0 goes into 1 an infinite number of times

>> No.3701202
File: 86 KB, 665x4834, math.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3701202

I have a better one.

>> No.3701207

>>3700558
category error

>>3701202
delicious

everyone go to /q/ to request LaTeX for /lit/

>> No.3701208

2-2=0/10

>> No.3701212

>>3700641
I don't even know what that means. Is it important?

>> No.3701225

>>3701202
jesus christ
whoever made this is a retard

>> No.3701234

>>3701187
Limit of 1/x as x approaches 0 from the positive is ∞, yes. but to say 1/0 = ∞ is erroneous

>> No.3701239

>>3701225
Whoever made that is a genius.

>> No.3701328

>>3700558
they look like boobies

>> No.3701361

>>3701328
mathematicians are perverts

>> No.3701379
File: 6 KB, 275x183, holyfuck.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3701379

>>3701328

>> No.3701779

>>3701239
>>3701225
What's the difference?

>> No.3702383

>>3701201
No it doesn't. It 1/0 is undefined. They're not the same.

>> No.3702388

>>3701187

>you
>understanding limits

pick one