[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 279 KB, 512x384, 1300936143704.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3684116 No.3684116[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

If I read the Wikipedia's plot summary of a book and then read a couple of analysis (of the same book) made by two recognized critics , could I say I've now read the book?

>> No.3684121

to your average pleb? of course

>> No.3684122

If I read the OP's post and then read a couple of analysis (of the same poster) made by two recognized tripfags , could I say I'm now personally acquainted with OP?

>> No.3684135

>>3684116

You could get away with it while talking to persons who haven't read the book.

>> No.3684141

>>3684116
Yes, even without the secondary texts.
>>3684122
Yes, even without reading any post

Both would still be false

>> No.3684144

depends on how long the book is

>> No.3684149

You can say anything you want to. You'd be lying, of course, but most people won't bother to call you out on it if you at least have general knowledge of the book.

>> No.3684161

She won't sleep with you OP, no matter how much lying and deceiving you throw at her.