[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 204 KB, 1075x1600, 1327788135_Blood Meridian.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3589644 No.3589644 [Reply] [Original]

Just finished this

Someone discuss the ending with me. I'm thinking the judge sodomize our boy, knocked him out and all that. he is left anally bleeding and motionless in a stall. what do you think?

>> No.3589670

I'm with you on this. I think he just fucked him. The judge is too cruel to kill him.

>> No.3589678
File: 25 KB, 503x318, 1311695666517.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3589678

I actually thought he brutally murdered him. He has a strange attraction to children, but "the kid" became "the man" so I don't think he would still want his asshole. Maybe he did, but I think he would have killed him too.

>> No.3589690
File: 8 KB, 354x142, 1361237275097.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3589690

wasn't kiddy about to fuck a whore? or just got finished fucking a whore? looks like he got fucked alright.

>> No.3589698

If someone was unconscious and bleeding anally, do you think people would really stop and gawk at him?

Don't you think the final scene actually exhibits a more shocking image than this?

>> No.3589707

>>3589698
>do you think people would really stop and gawk at him
I don't know. People seemed indifferent throughout the entire novel. The first dude said "don't look in there" in a tone that didn't read as too "shocking" at all.

>> No.3589730

>>3589707
>"Good God almighty" he said
>"What is it?"
>He didn't answer
Page 334
That's a pretty large reaction from characters who don't really react at all.

To the OP, I prefer the idea that it's unknown how he dies, just that it was so horrendous it couldn't be described.

>> No.3589740

I think the end was the judge more merging with the man, not a rape/kill. I think what was found in the stall was the missing girl from the town before, or even the midget whore, decimated by the man.

>> No.3589754

I just got this, haven't started it yet. I read his Border Trilogy and Suttree, how does this compare?

>> No.3589761

>>3589754
Border Trilogy gets progressively worse, Suttree is really good. Blood Meridian is his magnum opus.

Quick, get out of this thread before you read something you shouldn't!

>> No.3589764

>>3589754
Blood Meridian is arguably in the top 5 American novels written post-1945.

>> No.3589772

Judge screams he will never sleep or die because his influence will continue forever. The end signifies that he turned the man, imo.

>> No.3590753

>>3589772
he doesn't age to begin with

>> No.3590760

>>3589644
ah, blood meridian, monsieur? that novel is the sark an chaparral of literature, the filament whereon rode the remuda of highbrow, corraled out of some destitute hacienda upon the arroya, quirting with main and with pyrolatrous coagulate of lobated grandiloquence. our eyes rode over the pages, monsieur, of that slatribbed azotea like Argonauts of suttee, juzgados of swole, bights and systoles of walleyed and tyrolean and carbolic and tectite and scurvid and querent and creosote and scapular malpais and shellalagh. we scalped, monsieur, the gantlet of its esker and led our naked bodies into the rebozos of its mennonite and siliceous fauna, wallowing in the jasper and the carnelian like archimandrites, teamsters, combers of cassinette scoria, centroids of holothurian chancre, with pizzles of enfiladed indigo panicgrass in the saltbush of our vigas, true commodores of the written page, rebuses, monsieur, we were the mygale spiders too and the devonian and debouched pulque that settled on the frizzen studebakers, listening the lobos howling in the desert while we saw the Judge rise out of a thicket of corbelled arches, whinstone, cairn, cholla, lemurs, femurs, leantos, moonblanched nacre, uncottered fistulas of groaning osnaburg and kelp, isomers of fluepipe and halms awap of griddle, guisado, pelancillo.

>> No.3590761
File: 340 KB, 800x1200, yawn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3590761

>>3590760
>monsieur
tl;dr

>> No.3590768

>>3590761
what a horrible cunt you are, monsieur. yawning your face off without a thought for my internet self-confidence!

>> No.3590805

>>3590768
>what a horrible cunt you are
When you rest, you are a king surveying your estate. Look at the woodland, the peacocks on the lawn. Be the king of your own calm kingdom.

>> No.3590809

>>3590805
ah, imbeciles dream in postcard pictures. cunts, all of them, worthless cunts. they are not worth pissing on them. but what do i care? i take my little cock out, i give it a tug, and piss anyway!!!

>> No.3590817

>>3590809
>cunts, all of them, worthless cunts.
Leave it to others to be perfect, to be wonderful. Be content with what you are - you'll be much calmer as a result.

>> No.3590835

>>3590817
calmness is a disease, monsieur, which falls upon the old and the spiritually deformed. i will guard and horse my intensity and rage until i fall down dead, immobile, inert. in fact, monsieur, dead i will look appear so like the calm lived their lives that perhaps i shall be considered calm and not dead? there.

>> No.3590876

>>3589764
What else is in that top 5 in your opinion?

I can't speak for THE BEST of that time period, but my favourites would include:
American Pastoral
Underworld
Gravity's Rainbow

Um... what else?

>> No.3591102

>>3590876
Throw in something by McElroy

>> No.3591106

>>3590809
Soak in some lavender, etc

>> No.3591125

>>3591102
Is McElroy not printed anymore? I can never find his work in bookstores and I really want to see what all the fuss is about.

>> No.3591132

>>3591125
I don't believe most are, but his first novel is still printed, I actually bought it from amazon a few months ago and i'm just now starting it.

If you want to read his other works you'll have to get an ereader.

>> No.3591145

>>3591106
i will soak in the blood of men

monsieur

after and before

i will be mad during, before, and after

because, i was mad, i am mad, i shall always be

mad

>> No.3591153

I wish nothing more from culture than a good film adaptation of Blood Meridian

>> No.3591177
File: 144 KB, 848x375, human condition 2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3591177

>>3591153
I would love a long war epic type film, broken up into two parts, maybe 6 hours long, but that will never happen. I can see this being filmed kind of like The Human Condition... maybe one day.

>> No.3591186

>>3591153
Daniel Day Lewis as the judge.

>> No.3591210

>>3591153
Well, sorry to inform you that James Franco has been fighting to make it for some time now and he's probably not going to stop fighting.

>> No.3591224

>>3591210
Fuck. The film can't be made in America, we are too sensitive about our Injins and babies :(

>> No.3591241

>>3591210
He stopped fighting. He's settled on Child of God.

>> No.3592295

>>3589730
>To the OP, I prefer the idea that it's unknown how he dies, just that it was so horrendous it couldn't be described.

This. In a novel containing some of the most horrific imagery every committed to the page, from babies strung up by their eyes on tree branches, to men raping dying children on a battlefield -- what happened to The Kid is so far beyond all of it, that it cannot be described.

The entire novel is a buildup to that one moment.

>> No.3592702

Is it so certain that the kid died?

>> No.3592741

>>3592702
No, he might have just been raped or something. But I personally think he was killed horrifically.

Can anyone explain to me what the scene before the ending where the kid/man kills the orphan boy was all about? On first reading I got the impression it was just to show that the wilderness is a harsh place for harsh men, but I feel there must be more to it than that.

Fantastic read by the way.

>> No.3592756

>>3589740
This sort of makes sense if the Judge is more a personification of war or death or man's penchant for cruelty or something, rather than an actual person.

>> No.3593934

>>3592756
>rather than an actual person.
>it's based on an actual person
lolz

>> No.3593998 [DELETED] 

>>3592741
>>3592741
Earlier in the novel there's a kind of parable that the Judge tells. The parable of the traveler and the harness maker. The basic story is that there's a traveler passing through the wild mountains and he meets a harness maker who lives there. The harness maker tries to get money off him. Then the traveler gives him a lecture on morality. The harness maker then attacks and kills him, buries his bones, but the harness maker's wife discovers them, and cares for the bones of the traveler. The son of the harness maker witness all this and becomes himself a killer of men.

The Judge's main point I think is that evil and violence are inherited. But the harness maker's son isn't the only one who inherits this. The judge also stresses that the unborn son of the murdered traveler will grow up with warped, inventing some unattainable standard of perfection in the place of his dead patriarch. He will inevitably ALSO descend into a life of violence.

At the very end of the novel, the scene you refer to reveals to us that the descendents of the murdered traveler have, in fact, turned to violence, just as the Judge predicted. The boy who is dumb/brave enough to try and shoot our protagonist (now a man) is killed before he can attempt it. It's notable because it's the last murder that our protagonist commits, as if he is bequeathing the act of murder to the next generation.
When the dead boy's companions come to collect his corpse in the morning they say "His granddaddy was killed by a lunatic and left in the woods like a dog." Revelation! We've heard that story before haven't we? Things come full circle. Worse still, the dead boy's 12 year old brother inherits his brother's gun. The cycle of violence goes on.

McCarthy is an apocalyptic pessimist. It had to be this way.

>> No.3594002

>>3592741
Earlier in the novel there's a kind of parable that the Judge tells. The parable of the traveler and the harness maker. The basic story is that there's a traveler passing through the wild mountains and he meets a harness maker who lives there. The harness maker tries to get money off him. Then the traveler gives him a lecture on morality. The harness maker then attacks and kills him, buries his bones, but the harness maker's wife discovers them, and cares for the bones of the traveler. The son of the harness maker witnesses all this and becomes himself a killer of men.

The Judge's main point I think is that evil and violence are inherited. But the harness maker's son isn't the only one who inherits this. The judge also stresses that the unborn son of the murdered traveler will grow up warped, inventing some unattainable standard of perfection in the place of his dead patriarch. He will inevitably ALSO descend into a life of violence.

At the very end of the novel, the scene you refer to reveals to us that the descendents of the murdered traveler have, in fact, turned to violence, just as the Judge predicted. The boy who is dumb/brave enough to try and shoot our protagonist (now a man) is killed before he can attempt it. It's notable because it's the last murder that our protagonist commits, as if he is bequeathing the act of murder to the next generation.
When the dead boy's companions come to collect his corpse in the morning they say "His granddaddy was killed by a lunatic and left in the woods like a dog." Revelation! We've heard that story before haven't we? Things come full circle. Worse still, the dead boy's 12 year old brother inherits his brother's gun. The cycle of violence goes on.

McCarthy is an apocalyptic pessimist. It had to be this way.

>> No.3594003

>>3589644

I've been meaning to read this. Thinking about starting it once I finish Inherent Vice. Is it good? I've liked everything else I've read by McCarthy

>> No.3594006

>>3590760

This is the most wonderful thing I've ever read on 4chan

>> No.3594008

>>3591153

>tfw Paul Thomas Anderson directs Blood Meridian after he finishes up with Inherent Vice

A man can dream

>> No.3594021

>>3594003
>Is it good
see >>3589764

>> No.3594023

>>3594021

Well that answers that, then

>> No.3594041

>>3594023
>>3594021
'Blood Meridian' is juvenile tryhard shite.

>> No.3594042

>>3594041
Speaking of juvenile tryhards...

>> No.3594045

>>3594041
How is is juvenile, out of genuine interest?
Do you mean its readers are juvenile or its content or both?

>> No.3594046

>>3594041

Cool

>> No.3594048

>>3594045
*is it

>> No.3594051

>>3594045
>Do you mean its readers are juvenile or its content or both?
The content. The novel is babby's first nihilist crisis dressed in second-hand pulp fiction regalia. The readers are juvenile by extension, for placing such an average book on a pedestal.

>> No.3594054

>>3594051
>nihilist crisis
good job missing the entire point and not having any context.

>> No.3594067

>>3594051
Nihilism is only a small piece of the puzzle, and it's reductive anyway.
I think you're neglecting to consider the other major aspects of the novel. Most obvious, the notorious stylistic and formal conceits. The appropriation of Epic/Biblical language and Miltonic imagery into such an unusual setting.
Ok, maybe it doesn't constitute the kind of philosophical depth you're looking for, but it's part of why the novel is celebrated.

And of course there's there's the meditations on (or revision of ) The Great American Novel. Perhaps more importantly the Great American Novelist. Literary legacy is huge part of the book, it's obviously more subtextual than the nihilism you speak of (which is basically propounded through dialogue and events), but it's there.

>> No.3594070

>>3594067
That Yale professor on youtube seems to think the Judge outright represents the artist's desire to live forever through his work. That notion doesn't really mesh with the Miltonic Satan, but it certainly meshes with the Byronic one.

>> No.3594074

>>3594070
Bullshit. That's just ONE of the many things the Judge could represent. That's the beauty of the character. I hate it when academics pontificate like that. "This part of the novel means this and only this, no other interpretation will be tolerated!"

>> No.3594075

>>3594070
>Byronic
That signifies some struggle. The Judge has no struggles or self-destructive tendencies. That is only one small part of the Judge, he can't be boxed down.

>> No.3594077

>>3594051
Can some kind anon please explain to me what a nihilist crisis is? I'm rather ignorant when it comes to philosophy.
How precisely does it play into Blood Meridian?

>> No.3594082

I don't really think it was mccarthy intended the style of the novel to discard previous works and enshrine himself at the top as the pinnacle, but it seemed to me a subversion of the genres and tradition, a gross perversion of the classical and cherished beliefs to present a destructive message, sort of like how the judge collects specimens and researches the world, then destroys his findings allowing nothing to exist without his consent and that of violence and war's.

>> No.3594090

>>3594075
>can't be boxed down
Fucking this. In fact, the most satisfying interpretation I've heard is the Judge probably doesn't represent any one thing, but rather he represents the entire Western literary tradition of violence and evil, beginning with the Biblical Satan all the way up to more modern interpretations of timeless evil like Joseph Conrad's characters (a major model for McCarthy by the way).

>> No.3594096

>>3594082
That sounds like a pretty ambitious revision of a long standing tradition, though. It's nothing to scoff at. You're taking Homer, Milton and The Bible and saying - "now this is how I would do it instead." What right does McCarthy have? Don't get me wrong, it's a fascinating project he undertakes, but surely you can see that on some level, perhaps a level of consciousness McCarthy doesn't want to recognize, he DOES believe himself to be the pinnacle. The final passage of the novel seems to suggest he does anyway.

>> No.3594099

>>3594090
>Joseph Conrad
Can recommend a novel of his to start with? I'm thinking of picking up Nostromo but if I should start with something else first please let me know.

>> No.3594105

>>3594096
I don't buy into that meta-fictional interpretation of the final page, I don't think it's McCarthy's style to intrude into his own narrative. Maybe the final passage is more literal than you're giving it credit for? To me that possibility is all the more frightening.

>> No.3594106

I get chills whenever I recall that quote about the 300,000 year old skull that shows evidence of having been scalped.

>> No.3594108

Judge Holden is an simbolic Satan, right? An corporification on evil?

>> No.3594109
File: 322 KB, 960x620, Grease_960x620.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3594109

>>3594106
>I get chills
Are they multiplying?

>> No.3594110

>>3594096
>What right does McCarthy have?
Um, dude... The fucking reality is that EVERYONE of any importance in the Western canon of literature has been offering revisions to those great writers you mentioned. That's all it is, really. Homer and The Bible in particular are the foundation upon which everything else has been built. So McCarthy isn't being all that impudent with his Blood Meridian project actually.

>> No.3594111

>>3594108
Read the thread before you post, we're unpacking this idea right now.

>> No.3594114

>>3594110
>implying Shakespeare and Dante aren't the most important foundations

It takes a series of great writers (e.g. Homer, Virgil) before a true genius can appear, as Harold Bloom has noted.

>> No.3594116
File: 162 KB, 948x719, 1357950743802.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3594116

>>3594114
Go to bed, Harold.

>> No.3594122

>>3594099
I haven't read that one, ashamed to say. It's supposed to be great, though.

What I will say is that Heart of Darkness and The Secret Agent are the two novels with the most obvious examples of McCarthy-like characters in them (Kurtz and The Professor, respectively).

>> No.3594124

>>3594096
I just think that its just blasphemous and not revisionist in tone with respect to past literary tradition, and Mccarthy can fuck with the "Western Canon" because he can, there is nothing to stop him and there should be no impediment to doing so,anyone can write something that is critical or dismissive of previous works, it just usually comes off as edginess usually but not in this case

>> No.3594129

>>3594111

I do not think this book is so important and complex to get so many threads as he gets here on /lit/.

In truth, the connection between Holden and Satan is extremely obvious, which takes some of the beauty of it.

And for the end, it is ambiguous, but that is obviously because of the author's intention: he wanted the end to be ambiguous. And why? For a lot of people stay arguing, as you are doing; proud as any person, he wanted people to lose their time with him, thinking about what he wrote. Ambiguous endings are a trendy style of the XX and XXI centurys.

>> No.3594134

>>3594122
In case people were wondering what I was on about... Aside from the whole timeless and nihilistic evil thing, there are some pretty telling superficial similarities.
>The Professor
>The Judge
Defined by their title, more often than their actual name.

The Professor also has an explosive contraption that is curiously similar to the air gun used by Anton Chigurh in No Country for Old Men. Both weapons prompt similar meditations on life, death and fatalism.

>> No.3594136

>>3594124
I guess I agree with you, actually. I was just playing devil's advocate (quite fittingly, given the subject).

>> No.3594143

>>3594129
>the connection between Holden and Satan is extremely obvious
Could you expand on that? How is it extremely obvious? Is a REALLY bad guy who claims to be immortal automatically a Satanic figure? He could just as easily be God, you know.

The only obvious parallel with the Miltonic Satan I can think of is the scene where they make gunpowder out of volcanic rock and urine.
I haven't read it in a long time though.

>> No.3594146

>>3594002
Holy shit. I never fucking noticed that. You've just enhanced my appreciation for the novel, which I didn't think was possible since it's my favourite novel already.

>> No.3594153

>>3594143
But God is a good guy, you idiot. God doesn't murder people and rape children.

>> No.3594168
File: 20 KB, 250x296, 188498977834.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3594168

>>3589730

>it was so horrendous it couldn't be described.

>> No.3594171

>>3594153
Hopefully sarcasm, but the bible is full of moral quandaries like this and god's chosen are just as vengeful and murderous as the judge is in many cases
divine support inspiration/=good

>> No.3594172

>>3594143
>He could just as easily be God, you know.

That would be to interpret the book somewhat distant from the general cultural view of good and evil (of course: these values are human creations, and nor a God or devil will care with human values). God in the Bible commits many evil deeds, but never raped children, for example. But be assured that the author, when writing, I was thinking that people would link Holden to something bad, likely to satan.

>>3594143
>How is it extremely obvious?

I mean it's obvious for several reasons: the scene you mentioned, when he looks at the clouds and seems to divert them only with his will; his physical strength; his intelligence without limits; his abilities on everything; his knowledge of all things; his superhuman hearing; that fact that he promotes the destruction of a preacher in the church; his claims that he will never die, and of course, all his evil acts.

>> No.3594180

>>3593934

That's not relevant, do you even postmodernism?

>> No.3594182

>>3594172
Ok... it is pretty obvious, I guess. I need to read it again to refresh my memory.

>> No.3594188

>>3593934

>based on an actual person

if by actual person you mean "this one strange man mentioned only a couple in this book in which large portions may or may not have been made up, and who isn't mentioned anywhere else and might as well not have existed outside of those couple mentions in that one book"

>> No.3594189

>>3594074

>hurr why don't people keep saying that it's their own opinion
>muh autism

>> No.3594195

>>3594189
People on a forum like this, sure. I don't require everyone to preface their posts with "in my opinion." But I'm sick of educators acting like the interpretation in the textbook or in their PhD thesis is the one and only.

>> No.3594204
File: 33 KB, 400x566, my-confession-the-recollections-of-a-rogue.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3594204

>>3594188
>My Confession: Recollections of a Rogue

Read this book and learn you some. A bunch of the guys in the book are based on real people, including the Judge.

>> No.3594213

>>3594204
Um, he can't read it because the only copies left in existence are priced anywhere between $200 and $700. Believe me, I've looked.

>> No.3594217

>>3594213
go to a university library, mine has a copy

>> No.3594219

>>3594213
>what is a library?

>> No.3594220

>>3594217
and you haven't stole it yet?

>> No.3594225

>>3594067
>Most obvious, the notorious stylistic and formal conceits. The appropriation of Epic/Biblical language and Miltonic imagery into such an unusual setting.
Yeah, that's precisely the 'second-hand pulp fiction regalia' I was talking about. Only somebody extremely poorly read in 20th-century literature could be impressed by this shit in 1985. (The year 'Blood Meridian' was published.)

>And of course there's there's the meditations on (or revision of ) The Great American Novel.
There aren't any. You're imagining things that aren't there.

>> No.3594229

>>3594220
What's the point? It's obscurity destroys any value it holds to anyone but a blood meridian reader, also its as much fiction i'm sure as mccarthy's work

>> No.3594232

>>3594204
You're an idiot. If the Judge is based on a real character, then so is Conan the Barbarian.

>> No.3594234

>>3594229
>What's the point?
sounds like an easy $300

>> No.3594242

>>3594225
>extremely poorly read
Well, you're making a pretty broad statement and lumping in most of academia which has embraced the novel. Even grumpy old Harold Bloom.

It may well have been done before, but evidently it was never done better.


>There aren't any. You're imagining things that aren't there.
Read literally ANY scholarship on this novel and you'll find something testimony to the contrary. Even the bloody undergraduate lectures available on youtube as an introduction to the novel cover this theme pretty extensively. It's not really up for debate. That subtext is there. Don't tell me you didn't recognise the fairly explicit relationship between Moby Dick and Blood Meridian, because I know you did.

>> No.3594245
File: 234 KB, 430x533, markmahaney_haroldbloom_2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3594245

>>3594225
>extremely poorly read

>> No.3594246

>>3594242
>the fairly explicit relationship between Moby Dick and Blood Meridian

There's undeniably a relationship, but it's hardly explicit. McCarthy is more subtle than that.

>> No.3594252

>>3594246
Giant white whale.
Giant white man.

Right... subtle.

>> No.3594257

>>3594225
What other books do something similar? I'm genuinely interested because I loved Blood Meridian and would like to read more of that style.

>> No.3594273

>>3594257

Why not read more McCarthy then?

>> No.3594283

>>3594273
I think anon wants more violence, the sick fuck

>> No.3594299

>>3594002
>apocalyptic pessimist

Well read, I would only add he is a romantic apocalyptic pessimist

"He thought that in the beauty of the world were hid a secret. He thought that the world’s heart beat at some terrible cost and that the world’s pain and its beauty moved in a relationship of diverging equity and that in this headlong deficit the blood of multitudes might ultimately be exacted for the vision of a single flower."

>> No.3594780

>>3594299
guess I'll have to read all the pretty horses now

>> No.3594836

>>3594299
>this headlong deficit the blood of multitudes might ultimately be exacted for the vision of a single flower
I know you're enchanted by the electric purple prose, but let me translate this to plain English:
"Millions and millions of people have been brutally murdered, mutilated and destroyed, but that's OK, because look -- a pretty flower, lol".

Really, anon? Really?? Do you really lap up this asinine bullshit and beg for more?

>> No.3594870
File: 84 KB, 478x344, 1184816691132.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3594870

>>3594836

Except that the "He" becomes rather important since we're dealing with a novel. A wat? OH, A NOVEL. A COMPLETE WORK. Don't cherry pick half of a sentence to make an already shallow point.

You can reduce any literature to simple English. Would art be better if we all said what we meant in the most pedantic of ways? If we all just painted what we saw?

>> No.3594910

>>3594870
> A wat? OH, A NOVEL. A COMPLETE WORK. Don't cherry pick half of a sentence to make an already shallow point.
So if my chocolate cake comes with a teaspoon of shit, I shouldn't complain -- because I haven't yet sampled the 'complete work' yet. Right?

> You can reduce any literature to simple English. Would art be better if we all said what we meant in the most pedantic of ways?
If your novel becomes laughably stupid when stripped of the purple garnish, then you're doing it wrong. The best literature shines even when stripped in the most pedantic of ways. That's what makes them classics that stand the test of time.

>> No.3594953
File: 62 KB, 604x579, hotdog.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3594953

>>3594910

Yeah fuckwit, you stripped the purple garnish off of half a sentence, and in so doing missed the point of the sentence, not to mention the rest of the novel.

Great job.

It's from the perspective of a young man who is considering killing and or dying for a girl (or flower). It's not McCarthy standing there in a beret freestyling his thoughts on the world, it's a part of a story.

>> No.3594978

>>3594910
>The best literature shines even when stripped in the most pedantic of ways.
You're another genre fiction fag that tosses yourself off to simple plots and "worldbuilding" aren't you

>> No.3596319

>>3594780
One of my favorites by him for sure, definitely read it.

>> No.3596349

>>3591186
only John Malkovitch

>> No.3596437

>>3594077
It's the confrontation with death and the obliteration of the self and everything in its turn. This is a polarity to life, ie. theism in its various fashions. Blood Meridian is a forced monologue about devalue and the cyclical nature of violence in humanity that McCarthy alludes to in his other works. He's a conceited, spiteful, and a downright selfish pessimist and should be considered as such when considering the brutality of his characters and the relationships between people. I'm not >>3594041 but he states it as simply as Americans can and its its rather honest.

Think of it this way when considering his work. When presented as such, are they true dialectics? What is the point of view of his personal narrative? Why hasn't McCarthy, in all his nihilistic hysteria, manned up and put a bullet in his miserable head?

Ego

Now ask yourself if you take that so seriously

>> No.3596474

>>3594953
>It's not McCarthy standing there in a beret freestyling his thoughts on the world
No, that _exactly_ what he's doing. In fact, doing through the words of a ridiculous self-insertion puppet makes it even more stupid.

>> No.3596477

>>3594978
>You're another genre fiction fag that tosses yourself off to simple plots and "worldbuilding" aren't you
Actually, I was talking about Homer and Shakespeare and the Chinese classic novels. Works where you will _never_ be able to enjoy the stylistic conceits and flourishes.

Nice try, though; for a guy who doesn't even read, you pull off the homosexual bookish hipster character pretty well.

>> No.3596485

>>3596437
>Now ask yourself if you take that so seriously
Well, the vast majority of people who like 'Blood Meridian' do so because they get off on the death porn. They would have rather watched a 'summer blockbuster' with explosions and people's heads being blown off, except for the fact that they can't force themselves to visit a place as mainstream and plebeian as a movie theater. (Unless they're showing Woody Allen or something.)

It's all an unhealthy charade.

>> No.3596504

Hamlet:
Should I kill myself or not? Well...life sucks, but I also don't know what happens after death. Isn't it lame how no one has come back from the dead to tell us what it's like?

SO DEEP

>> No.3596611

>>3590760
I-Is that you Finnegans Wake?

>> No.3596613

>>3594002
It isn't confirmed that the orphan's grandfather is the murdered man mentioned in the parable. It could just be another man killed and buried.

>> No.3596616

>>3594067

>Ok, maybe it doesn't constitute the kind of philosophical depth you're looking for, but it's part of why the novel is celebrated.

What philosophical depth? Not trolling, but I want to know what new thoughts Blood Meridian proposed?

>> No.3596639

>>3594242
>Don't tell me you didn't recognise the fairly explicit relationship between Moby Dick and Blood Meridian

Taking inspiration from or referencing doesn't equal 'meditations on the american novel' as the poster you're replying to said. Why isn't it up for debate?

>> No.3596650

>>3596613
It's heavily implied. The connection is hard to ignore.

>> No.3596653

>>3596639
You should watch the Yale lecture on youtube. It spends about 20 minutes explaining how important Moby Dick (as the Great[est] American Novel) is to Blood Meridian. The similarities are undeniable, whether or not there's a specific commentary or revision going on below the surface allusions is up for debate. But it seems more than plausible to me.

>> No.3596656

>>3596616
That's what I was saying, there is no great philosophical depth. But the poster I was replying to was ignoring other great aspects of the novel. Surely philosophical depth is not the one and only criteria we use for measuring quality?

>> No.3596657

>>3596653
I've seen it. I have a hard time imagining that the judges final lines indicate Macarthy's belief that the judge has eclipsed all other grand characters in the western tradition, and that he'll thus 'never die' in the minds of the audience.

>> No.3596954

>>3596657
>judge has eclipsed all other grand characters in the western tradition, and that he'll thus 'never die' in the minds of the audience.
Not sure about the first part but that second part seems accurate.

>> No.3599039

judge is god

>> No.3600711
File: 467 KB, 1024x1024, Lecture on Geology by Judge Holden.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3600711

>mon visage quand this thread

the judge is the resurrected moby dick and ahab as one. whereas in moby dick, ahab is trying to get an answer for whether or not there is absolute meaning to the universe (read: ontological dilemma):
ahab gets leg chomped by moby dick: seeks it out to see if moby dick is an intelligent divine entity (if there's an absolute meaning to the universe or not), or if moby dick's just an unintelligent brute beast (there is no absolute meaning to the universe - nihilism). this mirrors the ontological dilemma the West has had for the last few thousand years.

instead of the normal translation: instead of the polytheistic answer that Melville gives (that it isn't one way or the other), as seen with ahab not getting an answer and getting taken down into the indeterminate ocean ~ meanwhile ishmael survives floating on queequeg's polytheistic coffin.

blood meridian says that there is an answer to the ontological dilemma: "war is god", recalling heidegger's "conflict/war (polemos) and logos (god/the gathering) are the same," recalling heraclitus' war/strife (polemos) is the father of all things."

strife/conflict/war is what brings being into being. this is an ontological claim though, and the judge confuses its truth for the ontic. we see this in the way that yes, conflict out-competes cooperation, but there are times where cooperation out-competes conflict. this is the nonviolent thinking that heidegger wants us to get back to.

>> No.3601030 [DELETED] 

>>3596504
"And yet you've played the greatest parts! You've played Shakespeare! You've played Hamlet! Have you never been touched in your inmost soul when speaking that tremendous monologue: To be or not to be...."

"What do you mean by tremendous?"

"Full of profound thought."

"Do explain yourself! Is it so full of profound thought to say: Shall I take my life or not? I should do so if I knew what comes hereafter, and everybody else would do the same thing; but as we don't know, we don't take our lives. Is that so very profound?"

"Not if expressed in those words."

"There you are! You've surely contemplated suicide at one time or another? Haven't you?"

"Yes; I suppose most people have."

"And why didn't you do it? Because, like Hamlet, you hadn't the courage, not knowing what comes after. Were you very profound then?"

"Of course I wasn't!"

"Therefore it's nothing but a banality! Or, expressed in one word it is—what is it, Gustav?"

"Stale!" came a voice from the clock, a voice which seemed to have waited for its cue.

don't steal from strindberg, it's not cool

>> No.3601639

>>3589644
the judge was the necessary violence it took to tame the west.
our empire is possible because of his violence.

the epilogue is about fence posts dividing up the now tame lands.

>> No.3601641

>>3596616
blood meridian : america :: old testament : middle east