[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 14 KB, 200x200, 200px-Phillip_schofield_2011_headshot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3527235 No.3527235 [Reply] [Original]

Is Jacques Derrida actually worth reading, or his deconstructionism just as nonsensical as Foucault?

>> No.3527251

Hey! Discipline and Punish is awesome! Don't say such things about Foucault!
My guess is you're attemping to troll, good sir. But I can't take you seriously. I just ate pizza I'm listening to a french girl who in a vocaroo thread read a bit of La Nausée. I'm feeling so happy I would hug you whoever you are!

>> No.3527262

>>3527251
Post a link.

>> No.3527291

>>3527262
French:
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1m6AKkvCYVO
English:
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1Th3J492NNF

>> No.3527309

De la Grammatologie is pretty necessary if you want to actually understand a good chunk of contemporary critical theory, as well as arguably the Structuralism that came before it.

Note that there is a difference between understanding a theory and personally subscribing to it.

>> No.3527354

Fucking poser.

>> No.3528050

>>3527309
> any of derrida's books
> necessary

Nope. Derrida and Paul de Man are one trick ponies. Once you understand the kernel of deconstruction (you will understand it - its not difficult) you really don't need to read much.

Reading Derrida looks a bit like this TEXT [there is nothing outside of this] [and that] [and that] [and that] TEXT

It's a trick he borrows from Kierkegaard via Borges, I think.

Read Kierkegaard, Borges instead.

>> No.3528074
File: 127 KB, 442x763, oscar wilde.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3528074

>>3527235
Is Oscar Wilde actually worth reading?

>> No.3528077

>>3527235
I'm not Saussure.

>> No.3528072

>>3527235
I'm not Saussure about him.

>> No.3528098
File: 70 KB, 800x600, Elton-John.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3528098

>>3528074
Is Bret Easton Ellis actually worth reading?

>> No.3528107

>>3527251

Do you really get kicks from hearing a stranger reading a book you like? You must have a sad and lonely life.

>> No.3528114
File: 61 KB, 978x348, 1348081566968.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3528114

>>3528074
>>3528098

>> No.3528115

>>3528072
Good one, sir.
>>3527251
>listening to a french girl
for some reason it gave me an instant boner. Maybe the "girl" was enough.

>> No.3528159
File: 17 KB, 415x299, bob-marley-smoking.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3528159

Is Benjamin Zephaniah actually worth reading?

>> No.3528172
File: 99 KB, 600x399, 1354197597563.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3528172

>>3528159
Is DFW actually worth reading?

>> No.3528218
File: 32 KB, 450x456, louis-ck-6545.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3528218

>>3528172
Is Phillip K Dick actually worth reading?

>> No.3528232
File: 101 KB, 600x911, aph_6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3528232

Is Stephen King actually worth reading?

>> No.3528268
File: 21 KB, 278x353, danacarveyturtle.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3528268

Is Michel Foucault actually worth reading?

>> No.3528275
File: 62 KB, 620x343, brett easton ellis.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3528275

>>3528172
Put down that radio.

>> No.3528282

>>3527309
*differance

>> No.3530633

hes not

>> No.3530745

>>3527235
why not ask Zizek

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuZXplZvlVU

>> No.3531404

>>3528232
>>3528268
He looks like Foucault AND King.

>> No.3531407

>>3530633

This guy gets it.

>> No.3533089

Are you in my Literary Theory class? My professor was just talking about how ridiculous Foucault and Derrida get like two ours ago.

>> No.3533091

Foucault of that shit.

>> No.3533102

>>3533089
Such is life in clown college.

>> No.3533153

trolling with /lit/
>>3527235
>nonsensical as Foucault?
implying

>> No.3533274

>>3527235
>Foucault
Sorry, I don't read books written by fags.

>> No.3533318

>>3533274

No Oscar Wilde? No Shakespeare?

>> No.3533377

>>3533318
> thinks Shakespeare was gay
Lay off the crack, bubba.

>> No.3533388

>>3533274
No Bible?

>> No.3533392

>>3533377

"fag" doesn't necessarily imply an exclusivity of sexual behavior.

Pretty sure the dude sucked cock on occasion.

>> No.3533741

>>3533392
if he wanted to get ahead in the drama world he couldnt have not sucked cock