[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 9 KB, 211x239, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3506993 No.3506993 [Reply] [Original]

I'm trying to write this paper on what medium best conveys individual female existence but I don't even know how to define it, does anyone have an idea?

>> No.3507002

twitter

>> No.3507007

being a woman is like being a man only everything is terrible

>> No.3507006

Vagina Monologues

>> No.3507031
File: 41 KB, 302x338, ADLHDVNHBCHTSBRG NO.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3507031

>individual female existence

WHAT DOES THAT MEAN?

THAT IS JUST ANOTHER SPURIOUS "TERM" CREATED BY "CULTURAL MARXISTS".

"INDIVIDUAL FEMALE EXISTENCE".

WERE FEMALES NOT EXISTING AS INDIVIDUALS BEFORE "FEMINISM"?

NO.

ARE FEMALES' INDIVIDUALISM HINDERED IN A "PATRIARCHY"?

NO.

DO WE, IN THE "WESTERN WORLD", CURRENTLY LIVE IN A PATRIARCHY?

NO.

THAT "TERM" IS FALLACIOUS, AS THE LOGIC THAT CREATED IT.

>> No.3507050
File: 6 KB, 275x183, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3507050

>>3507031
This is my point exactly, as I was given the title I can't change it but I can't bloody write the thing either!

>> No.3507051

ask some females

>>3507031
you're not cute. fuck off

>> No.3507052

>>3507050
>replying to a confirmed paedophile

>> No.3507062
File: 6 KB, 139x210, ADLHD LONGHAIR CROP.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3507062

>>3507050

I SUGGEST THAT YOU WRITE AN ESSAY RE THE FALLACIOUS LOGIC BEHIND THE "TERM" INSTEAD.

I WOULD DO THAT IF I WERE IN YOUR SITUATION.

>> No.3507069

>>3507062
And talk about feminism -- as you have done -- without the prompt mentioning feminism at all?

>>3506993
At least mention how problematic it is for a male to determine what individual female existence is, let alone what medium conveys it the best.

>> No.3507071

probably crafts, right? would that count as an artistic medium? that's been women's work since women were.

>> No.3507077
File: 86 KB, 600x586, AREIZOO III.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3507077

>>3507069

"FEMINISM" IS OBVIOUSLY IMPLIED IN THE PROMPT.

>> No.3507089

>>3507077
Yes but you don't pick up an implication and run with it, so that it becomes a full-out assault on a related concept rather than the prompt itself. This is what happens when misogynists try to 'undermine' 'Feminazi professors'; they write a terrible essay and think they're getting points taken off just for disagreeing.

>> No.3507095

>>3507077
That hiragana isn't correct, and you should probably used katakana for non-Japanese terms. Just sayin, it should be

アレイズー

>> No.3507119
File: 11 KB, 100x100, AREIZOO 100x100.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3507119

>>3507089

YOU WOULD BE "VALIDATING" THEIR FALLACIOUS LOGIC, TO SOME "DEGREE", BY "COUNTERARGUING" THEIR FALLACIES, INSTEAD OF ADDRESSING THE SOURCE.

"DISSECT" THE FALLACIOUS "TERM", THEN ADDRESS THE FALLACIOUS LOGIC BEHIND IT.

NOT ADDRESSING THE SOURCE; THE FALLACIOUS LOGIC, ETCETERA, WOULD BE MERE "ANTAGONISM", AND YOU WOULD BE MORE EASILY DISMISSED.

DO NOT "ANTAGONIZE" THE ENEMY, NULLIFY IT.

>> No.3507132

>>3507119
But in order to do that, you'd have to explain how it is fallacious without simply identifying that feminism is behind this prompt and attacking feminism. From what I gather, you have put forward an argument that the prompt is fallacious because of feminist implications, but you can only explain this by using the terms of the prompt. If you want to talk fallacious logic, then it pays not to fall into the trap of begging the question.

>> No.3507198
File: 25 KB, 470x171, AREIZOO V.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3507198

>>3507132
>From what I gather, you have put forward an argument that the prompt is fallacious because of feminist implications

NO.

ONE CAN DISCERN & EXPLAIN THE REASONS FOR IT BEING FALLACIOUS USING MERE LOGIC, WITHOUT ADDRESSING, OR REFERENCING "FEMINISM", OR "CULTURAL MARXISM" AT ALL.

THE "TERM" IS BLATANTLY CONTRIVED, SO IT IS OVERLY EASY TO DISSECT & REFUTE IT.

I ADDRESSED "FEMINISM", AND "CULTURAL MARXISM" IN MY FIRST POST IN THIS THREAD, BUT IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO REFUTE THE "TERM".

DO WHAT YOU WANT THOUGH.

IF YOU COMPLY WITH THE SUBJECT, BUT STILL DO NOT KNOW HOW TO DEFINE "INDIVIDUAL FEMALE EXISTENCE", JUST WRITE FACTUALLY RE THE OVERALL HISTORY OF "FEMINISM" UP TO TODAY, USING A AN OVERALL "MALE GUILT" TONE.

>> No.3507211

>>3507095
depends how the latin stuff is supposed to be pronounced. also hiragana/katakana is somewhat stylistic.

>> No.3507212

>>3507198
>ONE CAN DISCERN & EXPLAIN THE REASONS FOR IT BEING FALLACIOUS USING MERE LOGIC, WITHOUT ADDRESSING, OR REFERENCING "FEMINISM", OR "CULTURAL MARXISM" AT ALL.

One can do the same with literally any paradigm of thought. I'm going by your first response to this thread; your attempt to dismiss it as fallacious while falling victim to fallacies yourself.

>> No.3507241

What a loaded prompt. No medium best conveys any existence.

>> No.3507261

>>3507241
no.

the existence of something through time isn't well conveyed by painting or sculpture, for example.