/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.3314484]

Has anyone read this? I was looking through it the other day and now I can't put the book down. I'm about halfway through and the pure complexity that this book gives to becoming a persona that becomes better than your true self just makes me look a life and social interactions in a whole different manner. I need more books like this, /lit/, it doesn't necessarily have to be about pick up artists and all that jazz, just the illusion of creating a false self that eventually trickles into reality or becomes the reality.

more pickup books are still accepted, however.

[Anonymous No.3314527]

link to epub or mobi?

I'm intredasted

[Anonymous No.3314533]

I've read it but it kind of made me feel like I'm not myself. I didn't go out and do all the stuff he is talking about but there is some useful information that I've used on girls I know or girls that I meet for the first time.

[Anonymous No.3314535]

I just lost the game

[Anonymous No.3314536]

>>3314533
such as?

[Anonymous No.3314557]

>>3314536
Slight touching on the arms and stuff like that or having good body language. I sure as hell won't go to a club wearing a feather hat or paint my nails just to fuck some girls.

[Anonymous No.3314580]

>>3314484
10/10

Seriously, I don't know why people read this sort of bullshit. I mean, it's just terrible, terrible advice, and not just because it's sexist. I say that because it doesn't work.

I'm weird, dress weird, smell weird, have bad teeth, and no money. I'm generally unfuckable to a lot of people for perfectly legitimate reasons, but I still get fucked by strangers with little or no coaxing. Wanna know how I do it? I don't. I laugh at girl's jokes, don't try to simaltaneously fuck everyone in the room, flirt casually, and respect women as my girls.

Really, the fact that I can't fully articulate how I get laid is part of the problem with the text. Imagine if there was a similar book about how to make life long friends, or how to be a revolutionary artist, or how to be happy. Actually, I'm sure there are books like that, but everyone in this thread has no problem recognizing that those are bullshit, because those are the types of things that are fundamentally unteachable skills, because the value of learning them is in the process of learning.

Still, we can say that learning a philosophy behind any of those skills is worthwhile, but the book fails again here. It assumes that women are weaker, or only respond to cruelty or being put down. This is untrue.

[Anonymous No.3314583]

>>3314580
Yeah, yeah, sure, whatever.
I personally didn't read it for the pickup advice. I read it because it was a good story about people's lives.

[Anonymous No.3314589]

>>3314580
Prove its untrue.

[Anonymous No.3314590]

>>3314580
this book isn't the kind of book you're thinking it is. It's a book about people that read the books you're thinking it is.

With that said, I agree.

[Anonymous No.3314593]

>>3314484

With a somewhat advanced look on this genre, I can tell you that this is far and away one of the worst books out there. The idea of self-improvement is a deserving target but this book just teaches you how to club rat douche.

[Anonymous No.3314600]

>>3314580
The sexism part is the biggest flaw, and you get the feeling that the book works as a sort of literary placebo: weak, unhappy men believe they aren't getting the female attention they think they deserve because they are missing something, so they blame the boogieman of feminism for 'making' them weak so they won't treat a woman 'how she wants/ought to be treated'. And that's the saddest thing about the book: no matter how many straight forward arguments against its promises, some men want to believe in it so bad -- and what a salvation that belief is, that lots of sex from women and respect from men is possible if you only follow a few simple rules -- that they'll fight to the death to defend it.

I've often dreamed about writing a counter guide to this, about how to get laid and not fall for bullshit (that, again, doesn't actually work), but the problem is that the idea of a 'how to get laid' book is so flawed. It is not hard to 'get laid,' ie, put your penis inside a body in that way we all find so universally agreeable. Thinking about it as a challenge, or something you have to trick women into doing, is what fucks a lot of dudes up, and keeps them acting incredibly unnaturally in the company of women they attractive and thus stopping them from intercoursing. Really, you just meet people your age, talk to them, and if it feels natural, kiss them on the mouth and take it from there.

[Anonymous No.3314604]

>>3314589
I have a girlfriend

I got her even though I'm a faggot. I was just nice and funny, and eventually made some moves. I didn't neg, or attempt any convoluted social combat. I just talked to her and opened myself up.

[Anonymous No.3314614]

>>3314604
Singular example, not at all relevant; don't make broad sweeping generalizations based on specific assertions. That's also hugely biased.

Hint: You can't prove it untrue.

[Anonymous No.3314616]

>>3314614
You can't prove it true. We can only bring up examples of each.

[Anonymous No.3314617]

>>3314484

OP, come back, when you have me a book about how to get a preteen sex slave with chopped off limbs and always swallowing.

Fuck you.

[Anonymous No.3314623]

>>3314617
Lol. why is the head of the penis the part that's blur-censored?

[Anonymous No.3314625]

>>3314589
The first claim is gonna be a bitch to argue, and I think it's more relevant to discuss the latter two, don't you agree? I say that women don't respond to cruelty or insults because in my own experience, I've never found anyone of any gender to like me more because I insult them. I suppose that I could imagine someone -- even someone with average self-confidence -- who might want to change your mind about them after you've said something shitty about them, and might even fuck you to do so. The problem I have with this is that it doesn't really line up with the macho "I fucked this bitch" sort of sex that the book is selling. Essentially, you're the one getting 'fucked': you say something you know is bullshit (eg you don't find this woman attractive), and she proves you wrong by taking your dick. Really, all you've proved is that she actually is hot

Anyway, that being said, when I fuck people, I like to fuck them because we like each other. That's important to me. I dunno, if petty mindgames work for you, I guess you should go for it, but that sort of juvenial bullshit doesn't get my dick hard

[Anonymous No.3314626]

>>3314614
>Singular example, not at all relevant; don't make broad sweeping generalizations based on specific assertions. That's also hugely biased.
>Hint: You can't prove it untrue.
What's your point, tough guy?

[Anonymous No.3314631]

>>3314623
the law only applies to the glans thats why they get away with small dashes too

[Anonymous No.3314634]

>>3314623
Japan.

[Anonymous No.3314636]

>>3314623

That's how fucking censorship works in Japan, peadick.

Faggotricity.

[Anonymous No.3314640]

>>3314636
Why is gore sometimes censored?

[Anonymous No.3314641]

>>3314626
Feminist critique is redundant. It presupposes certain baseless conditions.

[Anonymous No.3314643]

>>3314636
holy god that's beautiful.

[Anonymous No.3314644]

>>3314636
that pic is pretty genuinely upsetting. mostly because of the thought of the kind of person painstakingly drawing it.

[Anonymous No.3314646]

>>3314631
why does it only apply to the glans??

[Anonymous No.3314647]

>>3314580
This was honestly one of the most intelligent posts I've ever seen on 4chan.

[Anonymous No.3314649]

>>3314640

Because fuck you, kid.

Tadaima, hadzhimemashte, idaimasu!

[Anonymous No.3314650]

>>3314647
fucking goddamit. Stop it with this shit.

[Anonymous No.3314651]

>>3314649
Greasy ponytailed weeabo detected. Go back to your yaoi and yuri faggot

[Anonymous No.3314653]

>>3314646
because it's archaic bullshit and the glans was considered dirty in early japanese society. it's also why their women don't shave pubes.

[Anonymous No.3314657]

>>3314651

Fucking normalfag cunt. I'm living up this feces spattered lonely ranger thread of your neckbeardness, nuggetballsack.

[Anonymous No.3314658]

>>3314653
wait why don't jap women shave their pubes?

[Anonymous No.3314659]

>>3314653
That's just ugly. please go back to posting high quality.

[Anonymous No.3314662]

>>3314659
life is ugly.

>>3314658
mostly an association with prostitution but also because the clitoris and glans are were considered dirty and its now part of the culture.

[Anonymous No.3314663]

>>3314657
Seek professional help for your lame-ass insults

[Anonymous No.3314664]

>>3314647
Thanks, man! I appreciate you saying so.

Yo, other dude: I'm really trying to figure out where you're coming from. I get the feeling that you have some strong opinions about women in general, which is a belief I don't really understand. I like people, and I like women in a romantic way, but I don't really see them as an entirely different creature. I know I sound like I'm feigning naivety, and I do appreciate that some fundamental differences exist, but I don't believe women are weak.

I'm also reluctant to get into a long, drawn out argument about the weakness of men or women. I imagine us citing studies back and forth, me claiming societal influences, you saying that I'm a liberal fuckhead and that girls are just dumb, and nobody getting anywhere.

So, in the interest of good faith, could you elaborate on your opinion and tell what your opinions on this book, women, having sex, etc, are, and what lead you to those conclusions?

[Anonymous No.3314665]

>>3314662
Much better. Thank you. Don't post bad shit again.

[Anonymous No.3314667]

>>3314653

You heard the faggot, more low quality.

[Anonymous No.3314669]

>>3314647
>upvote

[Anonymous No.3314673]

>>3314667
This is good.

[Anonymous No.3314676]

>>3314653

It's hilarious that they think the HEAD is obscene, not the gutted little girl carcass it's being stuck into

[Anonymous No.3314677]

>>3314664
>implying

Spend the next 5 hours defining gender mentally; pick it apart over and over again, defining every term used. You'll have a ball and you'll see the problem.

[Anonymous No.3314678]

>>3314673

Fap away, Onan.

[LMAO No.3314680]

HOW TO PICK UP WOMEN TO GORE THREAD LOL. SORRY I CANT TAKE THIS HARDCORE GENRE

[Anonymous No.3314682]

Its not what it appears to be. If your already cute/have money/a decent sense of humor, it gives you a few good tricks to fall back on to get a conversation going in the right direction.

Essentially, what it boils down to is some cheap "psychology" and some bro-tier jokes and observations that will give you the confidence to actually talk to a girl.

So basically, its a waste of fucking money, and will not get you laid

[Anonymous No.3314683]

>>3314663

I didn't see you there. Are you hiding in shit, maggotchumpy?

[Anonymous No.3314684]

>>3314678
I don't fap to this. It awakens in me a ____ that no other art can hope to approach. Guro is not fappable for me, it makes me fear.

[Anonymous No.3314691]

>>3314678
i want to see pictures of the kind of guys who enjoy this stuff

[Anonymous No.3314697]

>>3314691

U geim, bro?
No pein, no keim.

[Anonymous No.3314701]

>>3314677
Sorry are you the same dude?

Really, really not trying to get into an internet argument. Like, maybe my least favorite thing to do. I've made my point, and I'd like to hear yours. Posting tons of guro is great and all, but for the sake of my curiosity, you could explain where you're coming from, please. kthx.

[Anonymous No.3314705]

>>3314701

I'm cummin' in ur ass, sweetiebuns.

[Anonymous No.3314721]

>>3314705
Not really sure where to take this, because I don't know if you're trolling, resistant to the idea of sharing your ideas, or not very smart.

[Anonymous No.3314727]

>>3314721

Go home, faggy.

Kids these days can't into bitches.

[Anonymous No.3314733]

>>3314727
Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

[Anonymous No.3314744]

>>3314733

Cry hardurr, it makes me horniurr.

[Anonymous No.3314749]

>>3314744
I'm gonna keep having sex with lots of people, but you got your guro. That's cool, right? And you got your misogyny, too, I forgot about that.

[Anonymous No.3314750]

>>3314697
What exactly is going on here?

[Anonymous No.3314755]

>>3314697
that looks like some kid i seen

[Anonymous No.3314758]

>>3314749

>2012+1
>still not fucking and killing children
>are thou mad, bru?

[Anonymous No.3314759]

>>3314750
Just a down bro doing some down bro stuff

[Anonymous No.3314769]

>>3314758
Come on, man, I'm responding to your troll bullshit, the least you could do is actually put up a fight! I'm saying you're a sexless moron whose one consolation in his pitiful life is that he can pretend he's stronger than women. When you start getting silly -- after post after post of "I am highly logical, women are sluts" -- it's like you're backing down. Do us a favor: if you're gonna troll, at least don't half-ass it

[Anonymous No.3314771]

>>3314769

Never gonna give you up,
Never gonna let you go,
Gonna shake my dick now,
Fuck you.

[Anonymous No.3314772]

>>3314697

were did u get my pictur

[Anonymous No.3314773]

>>3314771
Tough guy, you can do better than this!

Tell us again, how women are weak. You know how you could make a great comeback in this thread? Like, with a bunch of really intelligent, well-informed opinions that are hard to deny because they're true. That'd be fucking nuts.

[Anonymous No.3314775]

>>3314773

You sound meta, bro

[Anonymous No.3314776]

>>3314773
Oh, and here are some great ways you could bitch out:

1 - Claim that you were meta-trolling all along, that you are being a shitty troll who got bitched out because you were trying to psych us out, and you're not a dickhead whose getting made fun of without putting up any sort of fight because you're just sort of a weak person
2 - Sob story, or tell us how you have a disadvantage because you're on drugs anyway and just don't care
3 - Keep doing the same shit forever

[Anonymous No.3314777]

>>3314773

>get a load of this shitsprayer.gif

[Anonymous No.3314780]

>>3314775
just disappointed.

I saw this bullshit, didn't want to get into an internet argument, and decided to engage the dude with something close to open arms, and he keeps being a prick. I don't know why I expected anything different, faith in humanity or whatever. So, I was like, fuck it, I guess I'm fucking with this dude, but then he bitches out the second anybody says shit. He's gonna keep posting guro, because he's frozen up, like when you're losing a fight and you just keep swinging at air because it looks tough. Bummer, really.

[Anonymous No.3314781]

>>3314777
are you under the impression I'm checking out your images?

[Anonymous No.3314791]

>>3314780

You seem so new here that your negroid scent is evaporating from all of your pores.

[Anonymous No.3314799]

This thread is...surreal...

[Anonymous No.3314800]

>>3314791
You seem like someone who thinks he's hard or edgy because his opinions are unpopular, which would be admirable if not for the fact that you refuse to defend them. I'm trying to imagine what you're like in real life: angry, awkward, desperate for acceptance yet paralyzed by your false sense of superiority? If I'm right, just keep posting pictures of cut up women

[Anonymous No.3314801]

I keep confusing this author with the sociologist, Anselm Strauss.

A former classmate of mine from RMIT made a documentary covering two men who followed this book. They were complete sleazebags but apparently it works - just don't expect 10/10s.

Incidentally, I was at a Baby Animals concert a few years ago at some seedy venue and everyone was in real Aussie pub attire except for this one young Indian individual who was wearing a fully white leisure suit - I shit you not - and we would essentially just walk around the venue continuously throughout the night.

I never got the nerve to ask if he had gotten this idea from The Game because it's similar to what one of the men in my friend's documentary had done.

[Anonymous No.3314811]

>>3314604
My gf pickup was surprisingly without neg but I suppose there was subtle negging. I.E. I met her in a social situation where I was mocking everyone except her, while the rest of the room was attentively listening to a speaker, and I told her to leave with me point blank during the speech I had her giggling at. Then we walked for a bit, bought some food, and exchanged numbers. I think I even pulled out Pushkin at some stage, probably intellectually insulting her, and recited some Pushkin, but I don't think that counts as a neg.

[Anonymous No.3314812]

>>3314800

>caring about the opinions of the opiated masses
>nope.fag
>9edgy11u

[Anonymous No.3314814]

>>3314812
>doesn't care about opinions of opiated masses
>posts on the internet
pick one

[Anonymous No.3314816]

>>3314812
>>3314814

>opiated masses

[Anonymous No.3314817]

>>3314814
>inb4 pretend you didn't get called out on bullshit and keep posting guro

[Anonymous No.3314818]

>>3314814

Bullshit.

[Anonymous No.3314823]

>>3314625
But the book doesn't purport cruelty or insults as an effective pick up technique. Have you read it? What you're referring to is a 'neg' which is really just light teasing.

[Anonymous No.3314825]

>>3314818
Uh, actually you fucking are. Feel free to defend yourself, but you won't, because you're a kid.

>inb4 you keep posting guro despite being called out on your bullshit

[Anonymous No.3314828]

>>3314823
>which is really just light teasing.
That's how you rapists rationalize it, sure. But it's meant to be psychologically/emotionally harmful enough for the other person to lose enough rationality that they might agree to sleep with you.

[Anonymous No.3314831]

>>3314828
No because if it were psychologically/emotionally harmful, your girl would turn into bitch mode or leave. Of course it isn't hurtful!

[Anonymous No.3314833]

>>3314823
No, I haven't.

Maybe I'm being unfair, shit. Negging, the way it was explained to me, is some sort of mindgame where you tease people so they'll feel bad so they'll have sex with you. I don't like it for two reasons:
1. It assumes that they wouldn't fuck me anyway
2. It just seems disingenuous to over think it like this. Am I being unfair to people who always like to think their way out of shit? I don't know why it seems so shady, but it just seems like a shitty thing to do. Then again, I've got a contradiction here, because if works, then I've got to concede something, and if doesn't, I really have nothing to complain about other than stupid dudes buying stupid books and hurting some people's feelings in the process.

[Anonymous No.3314834]

>>3314828
>you rapists rationalize it
troll?

[Anonymous No.3314836]

>>3314825

Drop on the floor,
Do a barrel roll,
Palms are sweaty,
Mom, make some spaghetti.

[Anonymous No.3314837]

>>3314833
Just read it, judge for yourself. I got quite a bit out of the book. What women find attractive, what actually is romance, touching a girl to show interest, the list goes on.

And it works as just a good story.

[Anonymous No.3314839]

>>3314831
I thought the whole idea was to take yourself, an unattractive man, and then manipulate her mindbox so that she believes she's an unattractive women who is at the right level for you? I believe it's rationalised like that in the book.

[Anonymous No.3314840]

there's a certain poetic symmetry to the fact that the kind of person who women don't want to have sex with is exactly the kind of person who overlooks how pathetic and inadequate it is to earnestly read a book on how to trick women into having sex with you and then hold up said sexual conquests as proof on his own adequacy
each axiom feeds into and merges with the other like yin-yang symbol made of piss and shit

[Anonymous No.3314841]

>>3314837
That all seems like 'duh' sort of shit. Maybe I do everything in this book, but I call myself a feminist because I didn't read it there D:

Lemme skim it on google books or something

[Anonymous No.3314842]

>>3314840

10/10 would publish

[Anonymous No.3314849]

A PUA feverishly inputs a complex series of lever pulls and button presses into a shuddering steam-powered machine of vast complexity, muttering runic shapewords. With a final metallic howl, the machine collapses into stillness and slowly prints out a strip of tickertape: *Y O U. H A V E. W O N. 1. (O N E). S E X.*

[Anonymous No.3314856]

>>3314840
>>3314839

>>3314839
That's a negative way to look at it.

The PUA stuff is about bettering yourself and appearing attractive to girls. Women use a wonderbra, short skirt, and giggles. Its a little harder for guys.

[Anonymous No.3314860]

>>3314840
>each axiom feeds into and merges with the other like yin-yang symbol made of piss and shit
wanna have sex?

okay google booksin it.
Chapter 1 - Autistic man is taken into the arms of benevolent Mystery, a (mysterious?) man who was once beta as the best of them but will teach them how to have sex. This is like rehab, but for losers who don't have sex. Lots of male camaraderie and hot guys who have lots of sex (with women)

Ends with picture of sexy man's sexy eyes with knife in his mouth. He's gonna hop out of the pool and have sex with this woman.

Chapter 2 - Dude gets shit from a dude for only have sex with 7 woman, the homo (which by the way is about average, see below). Group of men looks at picture of sexy women that sexy mystery has had sex with. Mystery tells the basics of his techniques, such as FMAC, an acronym that took him "ten years to discover". Also, "Women of beauty are rarely found alone." Also, negging, which is "accidental [but actually on purpose] insults]


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/sexual-health-and-advice/8958520/Average-man-has-9-sexual-partners-in-lifetime-women-have-4.html

[Anonymous No.3314861]

>>3314856

I like to giggle, too!

[Anonymous No.3314862]

>>3314856
>a negative way to look at "negging"
Ha.
>Women use a wonderbra, short skirt, and giggles.
You're not describing the women I go for at all there.

[Anonymous No.3314865]

I read it. I thought it was sorta' interesting early on, but when it got to all the Courtney Love stuff I assumed it must be mostly invented.

[Anonymous No.3314871]

>>3314849
REMEMBER to disarm the bitch shield and leave her exposed to a photon Negpedo, the correct combo is Serious Face, Very Serious Face, Happy Face, AFC Face, A, B, Up, Select. if her eyes begin to glow you have fucked up the timing and you must IMMEDIATELY launch into a dodge roll to avoid her counter attack. Hide behind one of the ruined pillars in the corner of the club and wait for your mana to regenerate.
repetitive, overwritten, clumsy to an almost drunken extent, and tangled with nonsensical metaphors

[Anonymous No.3314873]

>>3314871

Don't forget to use armour with high high CHAR bonus.

[Anonymous No.3314876]

>>3314862

Respect. Real women need to be segregated from kinky sluts. Like trash: there's broken glass and then there's shit paper.

[Anonymous No.3314877]

>>3314862
Negging is a positive thing. Girls love being teased.

Is what a women would do to attract you completely uncontrived? No, so stfu

[Anonymous No.3314878]

>>3314876
Feminists want to cover up a lot of obvious observations about the vagina and vulva so they can continue to remain sexually ‘liberated’. I’m here to give you the facts which don’t just have science to back them up but common sense as well.

A ‘innie’ vagina refers to a vagina where the labia minora is smaller or hidden by the labia majora.

‘Outies’ are sometimes in slang called beef flaps, mud flaps, piss flaps, dangling hams, wizard’s sleeve, deflated ball sack, leather bombardier jacket, Arbys roast beef, wild west saloon doors (because of how it can get sucked into the vagina during sex). In African tribes it was called the Hottentot apron. Tablier and joyeau in French, sinus pudoris and macronympha in Latin, and in English, ‘drape of decency’ or ‘curtain of shame’ (all referring to extended inner lips of the vagina, or labia minora).

[Anonymous No.3314879]

>>3314860
Honestly this shit is hilariously homoerotic and I hope at least one man on earth has discovered his true sexual identity while reading a book on picking up women he actually has no interest in

Chapter 3
Narrator finally goes to a club, he's scared, but Mystery is going to hold his hand and help him along. Narrator uses interactions he has as teachable moments for how to use The Game (tm) to have your penis inside other humans. Things are going well, then they aren't, then they are, then narrator shares a poem he wrote when ten entitled -- I shit you not -- "Sexual Frustration"

Oh nuts I'm skimming too hard and missed chapter 4.

Chapter 5
So I guess they go to the club again but this time they just use the lingo instead of explaining it. Then there is a chart of things you can say to a woman that actually are sort of dick things to say. I honestly can't tell if they want me to say these or not.

Chapter 7 or so
They meet some dude with a super sexy deep voice who uses 90 percent technique (Omg he's like fucking Goku!) and uses the October Man sequence.

Chapter 8
Narrator goes to his super hot deep voiced friend's house and they're going to go get some chicks but he fucks it up, but -- CLIFFHANGER -- sexy deep voice is gonna teach em how to defeat the AMOG: the ALPHA MALE OF THE GROUP.

Holy shit this is gay

[Anonymous No.3314880]

>>3314877
negging is what tucker max once described as "I subtly disapprove of her for various reasons, so that she’ll be forced to seek my validation. By sleeping with me. You know, the classy and mature way to get women." if the fact that tucker max described it wasn't enough to clue you in, it's massively fucking manipulative and unhealthy, which is what this book's all about

[Anonymous No.3314883]

>>3314878

How about killing all them wimmins and starting the artificial gene pool of men master race? No cunt - no problem. As that bearded guy said.

[Anonymous No.3314884]

>>3314883
dude why don't you just trip it's obvious you want the attention

[Anonymous No.3314885]

>>3314880
Tucker Max has got nothing to do with it.

There's nothing wrong with guys bettering themselves.

Maybe you should read a book before pretending to know about it and dissing it. Seems so obvious but yet again I have to say it.

[Anonymous No.3314888]

>>3314884

Thank you for giving me attention, pedro.

[Anonymous No.3314889]

Okay I kept reading but this book is just terrible. I'm glad whoever suggested I actually read it got me to, because it's that fucking bad.

First of all, the story is all bullshit. None of that shit happened. Just use common sense.

Second of all, none of that shit works. Getting fucked is not Super Mario, and you can see how this shit would appeal to some people who are only good at video games, but that makes no sense.

Third of all, negging -- and pretty much everything in there -- is sexist as fuck, and rather than trying to justify being a fuckhead to try and get sex, you should just be open about it. No, saying shitty things is not like wearing makeup.

Fourth of all, this book isn't about getting laid, anyway. It's about male relationships. It's a bunch of dudes, one of who is a father figure, who live together and are friends and really care about each other, and that's what this book is really about. It didn't make any sense to me, why a book full of obvious bullshit would sell so well, until I read all the band-of-brothers shit in there. That's what fucking sells. It's fucking Top Gun

[Anonymous No.3314892]

>>3314885
there's a difference between "bettering yourself" and "learning how to trick people into thinking you're better than you really are," which is the central premise of all self-help books. do you honestly think reading this book has deeply, materially changed you, the man? or has it just changed the particular way you're self-conscious in social situations?

[Anonymous No.3314905]

>>3314893
I hate the above thread so much I'm bumping this one

[Anonymous No.3314906]

>>3314892
Honestly the one thing that threw me for a while was a lot of the PUA stuff they do won't work on a girl who isn't a 9-10. If you neg a 6, she might take it personally.

But generally it was worthwhile. I don't follow it religiously, but do get laid more.

[Anonymous No.3314911]

>>3314877
>Is what a women would do to attract you completely uncontrived?
I thought the whole premise here was that they're not doing it to attract you.

[Anonymous No.3314924]

>>3314889
cmon fellas i made like three posts making fun of this book and got nothing for it. Nobody is gonna defend it?

[Anonymous No.3314934]

>>3314924

There's a consensus of it being a stinky turd. Except that one dunce preaching omega faggotry.