/lit/ - Literature

File: 59 KB, 400x399, WTFAMIREADING.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Thu Dec 27 00:13:59 2012 No.3285582 [DELETED]

hey /lit/, today I read a little of "finnegans wake"

>mfw what the flying dick i am reading

extract: Then Nuvoletta reflected for the last time in her little long life and she made up all her myriads of drifting minds in one. She cancelled all her engauzements. She climbed over the bannistars; she gave a childy cloudy cry: Nuée! Nuée! A lightdress fluttered. She was gone. And into the river that had been a stream (for a thousand of tears had gone eon her and come on her and she was stout and struck on dancing and her muddied name was Missisliffi) there fell a tear, a singult tear, the loveliest of all tears (I mean for those crylove fables fans who are 'keen' on the pretty-pretty commonface sort of thing you meet by hopeharrods) for it was a leaptear. But the river tripped on her by and by, lapping as though her heart was brook: Why, why, why! Weh, O weh I'se so silly to be flowing but I no canna stay!

also: books that are really difficult to read threat(any language)

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 00:50:59 2012 No.3285777 >>3285582 Nuvoletta obviously is dying and is slowly losing her ability to vocalize in a rational manner. How is that difficult?

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 00:52:59 2012 No.3285784 >>3285777 ITT: Millions of people staring into a puddle and claiming they see an ocean, for fear of seeming silly.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 00:52:59 2012 No.3285785 i tried listening to a finnegans wake audiobook once before i knew finnegans wake was just a bunch of shit and was like wtf

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 00:53:59 2012 No.3285788 >>3285777 so why didn't he just say that? if some kid in an english 101 class handed in that paragraph you would give it an f and tell him to stop being "wordy"

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 00:54:59 2012 No.3285799 >>3285791 ITT: Metaphors involving the observation of bodies of water.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 00:54:59 2012 No.3285791 >>3285784 ITT: Millions of people staring into an ocean and claiming to see a puddle, for fear of seeming impressible.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 00:55:59 2012 No.3285803 >>3285788 Raskolnikov killed a lady and wasn't too content with his decision. >So why didn't Dostoyevsky just say that? If some kid in an English 101 class handed in that book you would give it an F and tell him to stop being "wordy."

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 00:55:59 2012 No.3285806 >>3285791

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 00:56:59 2012 No.3285810 >>3285803 crime and punishment was just long it wasn't "wordy", it's boring and preachy but certainly quite readable

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 00:56:59 2012 No.3285811 >>3285788 >divorcing form from content Go back to grade school

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 00:58:59 2012 No.3285824 Satan was buttmad at God because his pride could not bear being a subordinate >>So why didn't Milton just say that? If some kid in an English 101 class handed in that book you would give it an F and tell him to stop being "wordy."

Anonymous Thu Dec 27 00:59:59 2012 No.3285827

That passage sounds really nice.. I imagine the appeal of reading finnegans wake is half for enjoyment of the playful prose, and the rest is the hard task of interpreting it.. I think I'm going to try and read it in like 20 years or so, when I've hopefully read enough to understand a quarter of the obscure references..

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:00:59 2012 No.3285834 >>3285777 what a shit sentence

>>	demiurge Thu Dec 27 01:09:59 2012 No.3285880 the final bosses of /lit/ are Petersburg, Zettel's Traum and Finnegans Wake.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:15:59 2012 No.3285896 OP here btw non english speakers get challenge x2

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:29:59 2012 No.3285952 File: 20 KB, 200x309, InfiniteJest.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Not that hard to read, but very, very lemony narration, and lots of characters.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:30:59 2012 No.3285958 File: 87 KB, 300x300, Miserables.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3285896 ... so ... fucking ... long ... so... many ... characters ...

Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:32:59 2012 No.3285961

Plain English translation

Then Nuvoletta reflected for the last time in her life and she made up her mind. She cancelled all her engagements. She climbed over the banister; she gave a childish cry: Cloud! Cloud! Her dress fluttered. She was gone. And she cried and she was fat and she started dancing and her name was Mississippi. The rest is incomprehensible.

Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:33:59 2012 No.3285966
File: 13 KB, 300x450, Avalee.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>3285896

Option 1) you hate the main character and just hope she would just die already

Option 2) you actually understand that the the main character's pain and how she and every body else ever are complete selfish assholes with no spine, and you just hope everything ever dies.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:34:59 2012 No.3285970 >>3285880 maybe fw but the anatomy of melancholy definitely how appropriate

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:34:59 2012 No.3285972 File: 166 KB, 1125x1500, LOtR.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] > why the fuck should I care? > who are all those people?

Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:36:59 2012 No.3285977

I don't understand why anyone considers this deliberate obfuscation to be profound. He uses a bunch of nonsense words cobbling together bits of various languages to make dumbass puns and a completely incoherent text, and people are still masturbating over it trying to analyse this troll garbage. Fuck Joyce for creating this bullshit. It's even more hilarious when you consider the fact that he worked on it FOR TWENTY-FIVE FUCKING YEARS. Give me twenty-five years to look up every word of my text in every language and I guarantee I could create something just as fucking dense as Wake.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:38:00 2012 No.3285982 >>3285977 yeah it's like it's a fun exercise to try and figure out wtf he's talking about but i'm not convinced there's any deep insight in there, just a trivia puzzle of obscure references

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:40:59 2012 No.3285987 >>3285977 You're wrong, and you sound terribly immature. Like a newborn faget you are. There, there.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:43:59 2012 No.3285994 >>3285982 You guys are really fucking pathetic. Typical idiot behavior, not understanding something, then saying shit like 'rargh rargh I could've done the same', or "he's trying to be obscure and confusing on purpose" gtfo plz

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:43:59 2012 No.3285993 >>3285987 Explain why I'm wrong, please.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:44:59 2012 No.3285995 >>3285977 look another guy who sees the emperor is naked. call the press. >>3285982 >deep insight why would there be deep insight?

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:46:59 2012 No.3285999 >>3285972 A ring must be destroy because it has too much power > >>So why didn't Tolkier just say that? If some kid in an English 101 class handed in that book you would give it an F and tell him to stop being "wordy."

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:46:59 2012 No.3286000 >>3285995 well i like to believe canonical texts have some kind of insight in them and aren't just hobbits and swiggly wigggle do dippsity

Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:47:59 2012 No.3286003

>>3285994
Uh, dude, he actually was DELIBERATELY TRYING TO BE OBSCURE YOU FUCKING GODDAMN IDIOT.

Here's a quote from the man himself:
"They say it's obscure. They compare it, of course, with Ulysses. But the action of Ulysses was chiefly during the daytime, and the action of my new work takes place chiefly at night. It's natural things should not be so clear at night, isn't it now?"

Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:51:59 2012 No.3286012

>>3285977

I would respect your lousy opinion if you had cited the part of Apes of God where Lewis parodies Joyce's style, but you didn't so I don't. You're not the first the think the things you do about FW pal.

BTW: this passage is obviously a reference to Ophelia, bellying one of Joyce's puerile obssessions with the play Hamlet, which is also a focal point of the first or second part of Ulysses.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:51:59 2012 No.3286013 >>3286000 just because a text doesn't get all tao te ching on you doesn't mean it's just genre fiction for escapists. stop looking at literature like they're just a bunch of encrypted fortune cookies. jesus.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:52:59 2012 No.3286014 File: 36 KB, 512x572, 2deep4u.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3286003 >DELIBERATELY TRYING TO BE OBSCURE YOU FUCKING GODDAMN IDIOT.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:53:59 2012 No.3286017 >>3286012 Lol, where did I imply that I was the first one to think these things? I didn't come here screaming that I'd received a vision from the heavens and I finally knew the truth about Wake. I simply stated my opinion.

Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:55:59 2012 No.3286018

>>3286014
I just want to say that Finnegans Wake is not deep.

It is complicated but that's not the same as deep.

It takes forever to read but once you're deciphering it you realize there's absolutely nothing complex about the book. The most difficult language masks the simplest of ideas.

Hands down the biggest failure in the history of western literature.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:56:59 2012 No.3286020 >>3286014 Yes, Finnegans Wake is the ultimate 32deep64u book. In the most negative, meme-y sense. If Joyce were alive today, he wouldn't have written any books, he'd have just trolled /lit/ all day.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:58:59 2012 No.3286025 >>3286018 0/10

Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:58:59 2012 No.3286024

>>3285993
You're like a faget that's climbed a few mountains, you have some experience. You haven't climbed any mountains to their peak, yet you're going around town saying what can and can't be done. You distrust and talk down anything that you don't understand because your ego is so fucking small. You probably believe that there are no peaks, let alone that people jump off them and fly around like Joyce did.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 01:59:59 2012 No.3286027 >>3286024 OH, so there's no actual reason I'm wrong, you just disagree with me. Ok.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:01:59 2012 No.3286036 >>3286025 I mean, he's kind of right. The brilliance of Finnegans Wake comes from the sheer masterpiece that is the construction of the prose, not anything about the story. Only plebes read for plot.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:06:59 2012 No.3286047 amateur hour again >all books are shit, how can you not see that, i know everything, it's just an opinion You're not fucking entitled to an opinion. Too many retards on here think they are.

Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:07:59 2012 No.3286052

Don't you get it, faggot? Finnegans Wake is actually a profound statement about the end of literature. Joyce went out of his way to strip every iota of emotion, passion, and spirit from the act of artistic creation, and spent decades laboring over a meaningless literary puzzle book, creating a conglomeration of facile references and allusions that can be "solved", staccato-style, by any bourgeois plebeian who has taken a class with a dilettantish fraud like Harold Bloom. It is this very disjointed vapidity, this quantitative density of nothingness, which itself leads the nihilistic, scholastic student of modern letters to the qualitative realization that his way of intuiting art is fundamentally flawed. By perfecting the literary form as it existed in his day - the modernist novel, a concatenation of allusions and inside jokes for a demi-learned bourgeois intelligentsia - he was able to demonstrate its hollowness. He honed it to its ultimate conclusion, the pinnacle of pointless pregnancy, and thus laid bare its internal mechanism to all those who would see.

When he talked about bequeathing an enigma to critics for decades to come, he didn't mean that no one would beat his high score and unlock every reference to dead authors and Irish geography. He meant that no one would scry the true authorial intent of his masterpiece, for at least a generation.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:07:59 2012 No.3286054 >>3286036 this.

Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:07:59 2012 No.3286057

>>3286047
What? Everyone IS entitled to an opinion. They aren't entitled to state those opinions as facts. You're just buttmad because you wasted all that time reading Wake and when you tried to talk about it around the hot bitch from your lit class, you made an ass out of yourself.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:10:59 2012 No.3286061 >>3286027 You're right buddy. You are right as the sun. Now please shut the fuck and go play with your toys.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:10:59 2012 No.3286064 >>3286061 I'm still counting this as a victory, bitch.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:11:59 2012 No.3286065 >> I'se so silly to be flowing but I no canna stay! dat blackface phonetic spelling!

Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:11:59 2012 No.3286066

>>3286052

You forgot the real reason why the book is brilliant - everything you said about the book is true, but its opposite is true as well. It exists as a near-flawless stylistic conception piece. It's a mirror of the vacancy of beauty, an ode to that beauty and its depth in mucky water. That it works on both levels in a profound way lends credence to its merit and the years of study that have gone into it.

Also, someone said earlier that it's Joyce's rape confessional, which might be another interesting lens through which to read it

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:12:59 2012 No.3286069 File: 5 KB, 114x160, th_6gfuhy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3286057

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:12:59 2012 No.3286068 >>3286057 lol >>3286036 i love how you defend that bullshit with "oh but fw was really this brilliant work" and then skid right the fuck into this shit-eating non sequitur about lel only pelbz read4plot get a lyfe man lele

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:13:59 2012 No.3286071 >>3286057 Nigga plz Everyone being entitled to an opinion is why our culture is so fucked at the moment. Go back to watching the Kardashians and let us have a real discussion here. Faggat.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:15:59 2012 No.3286083 >>3286071 >Everyone being entitled to an opinion is why our culture is so fucked at the moment. I actually think the exact opposite is true.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:16:59 2012 No.3286086 >>3286064 Chalk it up as whatever you want you delusional piece of shit.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:16:59 2012 No.3286087 >>3286071 fascist detected

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:16:59 2012 No.3286090 >>3286086 Sorry that you can't support your arguments, bro. You'll get 'em next time, I'm sure.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:28:59 2012 No.3286115 So why haven't any of you naysayers responded to the positive claims itt?

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:29:59 2012 No.3286120 >>3286115 Wait. Which...side is the positive and which side is the negative?

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:32:59 2012 No.3286128 >>3286120 OP and co. are the naysayers. Go ahead and respond to these posts: >>3286052 >>3286066

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:35:59 2012 No.3286136 >>3286071 I hate the word "entitled." Don't you think everyone has a right to an opinion?

Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:35:59 2012 No.3286140

>>3286090
OP here ok troll piece of shit

"the river that had been a stream" here the author talk in a fashion way about a river, wich implicate the existance of water wich is obviouly a way to tell how Nuvoletta want to be purified before the act of dieing, this is why after he talk about the tear as sign of self purification.

I found a deep meaning YOU PROVE ME WRONG

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:37:59 2012 No.3286147 >>3286140 Make your observation coherent and I might. >Implying I didn't win this battle just by making you respond.

Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:39:59 2012 No.3286154

>>3286128
I'm ok with both of those statements, and I don't think those necessarily conflict with what I'm saying. The book is a deliberate obfuscatory mess, and I guess therein lies what Joyce was trying to do. I'm not saying the book has no merit, but it's also not just 2deep4me, like a lot of pretentious fags on /lit/ would have everyone believe.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:39:59 2012 No.3286152 >>3286036 > Only plebes read for plot. Even bigger plebs read for style. Form over function? Give me a fucking break, you fucking hipster.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:40:59 2012 No.3286157 >>3285582 > finnegans wake YHBT. HAND.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:40:59 2012 No.3286159 >>3286147 what that's?? oh yes, is the sound of you losing meanwhile the hole in your ass just keep expanding and expanding...

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:40:59 2012 No.3286160 >>3286052 >authorial intent

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:43:59 2012 No.3286166 >>3286154 The book is anything but a mess. You still don't get it. It's almost painfully brilliant and exquisitely structured. It seems like it remains too deep for you. Have you finished the book?

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:45:59 2012 No.3286176 >>3286166 Ok, mess was a poor word choice on my part. Remove the word mess from my post and respond again, if you don't mind.

>>	demiurge Thu Dec 27 02:45:59 2012 No.3286178 File: 243 KB, 500x744, 1355638664522.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3286152 >he thinks "form over function" is a meaningful statement when talking about art pic related it's you

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:46:59 2012 No.3286180 >>3286159 I mean, I don't understand what the fuck you said. So, as soon as you re-type your "deeply meaningful" observation, I'll obliterate you with my counterattack pussy.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:51:59 2012 No.3286190 >>3286180 you lost... hard, acept it and i may handle you "healerbutt magic cream" next time

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:54:59 2012 No.3286206 >>3286190 >Troll baits dumbass into getting mad and responding >Troll loses I think you're the one whose got this backwards, mate. STOP FUCKING FEEDING INTO HIS BULLSHIT YOU IGNORAMUS.

Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:54:59 2012 No.3286207

>>3286176

>The book is deliberately obfuscatory, and I guess therein lies what Joyce was trying to do.

That's a very small part of what Joyce was trying to do. You're being deliberately narrow with your scope of the work.

>I'm not saying the book has no merit,

Glad we agree

>but it's also not just 2deep4me, like a lot of pretentious fags on /lit/ would have everyone believe.

You're claiming the book is uninteresting, that it's only aim is muddying the waters. I'd argue it's still '2deep4u'

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:56:59 2012 No.3286213 >>3286207 Not claiming that's it's SOLE intent, otherwise I wouldn't say it has merit. Did you not see the part where I said I agreed with the points you both made in your initial posts. I'm talking about ONE ASPECT of it.

Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:56:59 2012 No.3286214

>>3286178

Of course it fucking is, you mouth-breathing troglodyte.

Everything that exists has a reason for existing.

(In the case of 'Finnegans Wake', that reason is to gently stroke the hipster e-peen of sophomore (in both senses) maleducated rejects of modern society.)

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 02:59:59 2012 No.3286222 >>3286206 >>3286206 i you have the last word arguing with a troll then YOU won, not the troll >impling i mad in real life as in the keyboard

>>	demiurge Thu Dec 27 03:00:59 2012 No.3286224 File: 827 KB, 350x262, 1354916735224.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3286214 >Everything that exists has a reason for existing.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 03:01:59 2012 No.3286226 >>3286222 No, if you respond to a troll AT ALL, you've already lost. No matter if you "win" the argument, because that isn't important to the troll, all they want is attention. You still fail.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 03:02:59 2012 No.3286230 >>3286213 I'm glad we agree it's a great book. You won't fully appreciate its brilliance with a single read or even a couple, though. There's a fuckload to digest.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 03:02:59 2012 No.3286232 >>3286226 [citation needed]

Anonymous Thu Dec 27 03:07:59 2012 No.3286246

>>3286230
I've not read the whole thing and I don't plan on doing so any time soon. I don't enjoy it. It is what it is, as a work, but it's just not for me. The only time I really ever look at it is whenever I have to reference some of it for a discussion.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 03:07:59 2012 No.3286248 >>3286226 are you the dungeon master who set the rules of the internet?? duh

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 03:08:59 2012 No.3286250 >>3286248 No, I just have common sense.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 03:09:59 2012 No.3286251 >>3286250 Dude, this is /lit/, no one here even knows what that means.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 03:10:59 2012 No.3286253 >>3286250 comon sense my balls /threat

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 03:11:36 2012 No.3286255 >Oh sweet. Let me read this 2deep4me book so I can prove to my friends I read it

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 03:12:36 2012 No.3286257 File: 46 KB, 566x302, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3286255

New conversationalist Anonymous Thu Dec 27 03:12:36 2012 No.3286261

>>3286246
Honestly I can appreciate that, it would be a shame if everyone held the same values in regard to literature.

Honestly my feelings wouldn't be hurt if I could keep Joyce to myself, in relative or absolute obscurity. Having a firm grounding in a particular artist I like and others don't gives me a shot at new perspectives in conversation or my own work. Maybe, too, because I'm selfish. Either way, I appreciate our difference because it gives the entire field of literature more dimension.

People who expect their favorite artist to be universally lauded are typically assholes who can't imagine anyone disagreeing with them. If you want consensus, please pick up a math textbook.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 03:13:36 2012 No.3286262 >>3286224 >i'll post one of the thousands of gifs I collected during my spare time and show him off

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 03:14:59 2012 No.3286266 >>3286246 You're under no obligation to read it or like it. I just wanted to clarify that the book is not this vacant wank-fest it's assumed to be.

>>	demiurge Thu Dec 27 03:18:59 2012 No.3286282 >>3286262 i don't have to show him off, he's already done that himself by being an idiot.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 03:19:59 2012 No.3286285 >>3286266 >I just wanted to clarify that the book is not this vacant wank-fest it's assumed to be. Okay. Like, that's totally your opinion.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 03:20:59 2012 No.3286290 >>3286282 Evidently he meant all literature has a purpose, you pedantic autist.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 03:21:59 2012 No.3286294 >>3286285 I've explained in detail why this is so in the thread. You're welcome to critique my reading of the book.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 03:24:59 2012 No.3286300 It may not be a VACANT wank-fest, but it's still a wank-fest. Or, maybe the book itself is just wanky. The fest comes in with the pseudo-intellectual wannabe autists.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 03:24:59 2012 No.3286303 >>3286224 > Thinks an animated gif a meaningful response to anything. Learn to lose gracefully, dude.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 27 06:54:12 2012 No.3286683 >>3285810 >boring dohohohohohoho

Anonymous Thu Dec 27 07:01:11 2012 No.3286688

>>3285977
i'm not nearly well read enough to realize even a fraction of Joyce's references. However, I find that his writing is in some ways similar to my thought processes. It's the closest stream of consciousness i can find to what goes on in my head, albeit sans obscure references. I see niether the puddle nor the ocean. I see myself

also this is first post on /lit/

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]