[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 227 KB, 491x550, nabokovwaithere.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3275457 No.3275457[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Is there one true philosophy, /lit/?

>> No.3275471

Get together and feel alrightism.

>> No.3275476

Be excellent to each other

>> No.3275486

>>3275471
This seems as good a thread as any to ask.

What's the best book to read for an introduction to philosophy /lit/? From someone who has no clue but a real interest. Not an actual introduction book but the best accessible one.

>> No.3275485
File: 137 KB, 265x290, niggest.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3275485

the only answer is to keep asking questions.

Messenger bird, should I keep writing?
Trying to find my way?
Will your response, only leave me questioning?
For then I will find my answer.

>> No.3275490

>>3275476
Party on, Wayne

>> No.3275493

He did stop, OP. July 2, 1977.

>> No.3275497

>>3275486
Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction
Then move on to the philosophers mentioned in that.

>> No.3275500

>>3275493
He's doing it beyond the grave, molesting fertile minds with his garbage opinions.

>> No.3275503
File: 28 KB, 300x300, stupid.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3275503

>>3275486
Philosophy for Teenagers.

>> No.3275507

>>3275503
>stupid.jpg

No thanks buddy.

>>3275497
I'll have a look. Thanks.

>> No.3275519
File: 7 KB, 225x225, yeahhhhnigga.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3275519

>>3275503
In all honesty OP, that book was given to me by a good friend of mine who was attending a private school and that was one of his textbooks. It was actually really interesting.
A more real suggestion would be Political Thinkers. I has a great chronological introductory view on a lot of pinnacle philosophers and political thinkers.

>> No.3275532

>>3275519
Ooh, that sounds brilliant. Thanks man.

>> No.3275535

No, there is no one true philosophy.

And philosophy is not a big chunk of stuff. You are interested, but interested in what exactly? "Thinking stuff"? Then go with greeks and move on and 'hyperlink' from book to book. If you have no questions, you can't into philosophy. If you have questions, you'll know what to read and you'll get better questions for the next round.

>this thread again
>being this naive

>> No.3275543

>>3275535
Err. OP here. Me and the guy asking questions aren't the same fucking person.

>> No.3275550
File: 26 KB, 309x488, camus 001.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3275550

>>3275457
No one true philosophy. But the best answer is obviously Absurdism. Pic related.

>> No.3275552

>>3275535
I indefinably agree that there are many different fields of philosophical doctrine. However, wouldn't you agree that this more concerns people who are training in academic philosophy, rather, let's say OP here, who may not want to embark on a who academic philosophical tangent, but merely is searching for general philosophies in the more basic questions of how one is a apart of a defined reality and social construction.

>> No.3275561

>>3275550

Camus is a dreadful bore.

>> No.3275575

nihilism

>> No.3275578

>>3275561
so is your post

>> No.3275585

>>3275550
That's not a philosophy. It's just giving up. Don't be a quitter!

>> No.3275603

Thomism.

>> No.3275609

>>3275585
But... Absurdism is about not giving up. Like, that's its core thing.

>> No.3275612

the ultimate philosophy is any form of life affirming philosophical pessimism in the vein of Leopardi, Nietzsche and Camus

>> No.3275619
File: 14 KB, 539x473, pants.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3275619

>>3275612
<this is you in an airport.

>> No.3275627

>>3275619
That doesn't make any sense.

Holy shit. /lit/ is literally becoming worse by the day.

>> No.3275638

>>3275612
>>3275585
Have you ever actually read any Camus, or do you simply have poor comprehension skills?
>>3275609
This anon understands. It's not that complicated, y'all.

>> No.3275643

>>3275627
It's a metaphor bro.
All the philosophers are antiphilosophers. So, flying on an airplane is like doing philosophy, and you're trying to gain admittance to the realm of philosophers without adhering to their (glaringly obvious) standards and conventions. If it helps, try to think of the woman's pants as the emperor's new clothes.

In other words you're trying to philosophize without actually philosophizing, which to the rest of us looks absurd and stupid.

>> No.3275647

>>3275643
All of those philosophers**

>> No.3275699

>>3275486
VSI is about the best place to start. You can also get general anthologies, Classics of Western Philosophy by Steven Cahn was suggested in a previous thread and looks decent, but if you wanted some insight into ethical thought for example there are plenty of good anthologies for ethics too. And check out the In Our Time podcasts.

>> No.3275738

>>3275550
Embrace it, bros

>> No.3275746

>still not accepting nihilism
when are you going to stop lying to yourself?

>> No.3275750

>>3275746
When you sufficiently argue against absurdism AND Spinozism.

>> No.3275756

>>3275750
is there any inherent meaning in spinozism, though?

>> No.3275758

>>3275550

Jesus Christ!
Camus was a disgrace - being an absurdist is like being a baby sitting in the corner shitting his pants because he lacks the self-discipline to find out that if he finds life meaningless and doesn't understand shit it is not because the world is horrible rather than himself being to stupid and spoiled to understand and embrace it - and most importantly, create meaning.
Spinoza is Nietszche for adults and everything he says is true.
If anybody disagree with me I would like to hear it. If you have read his work, that is.
Yes, he was a man of a single work because his balls were that big.

>> No.3275760

>>3275750
Absurdism is basically nihilism but with the suggestion that you must continue searching for meaning despite the confirmed conclusion there is none

>> No.3275766
File: 341 KB, 612x3629, 1354511012450.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3275766

obviously not

>> No.3275773

>>3275457
Stoicism.

>> No.3275777

>>3275756
Eh. If the "self" is not really distinct from non-self, you can pretty easily transition into the whole "we should seek to move beyond our ego and recognize at all times our oneness with the ultimate reality" deal.
>>3275758
>it is not because the world is horrible rather than himself being to stupid and spoiled to understand and embrace it
Yeah, he actually says that the absurd IS the difference between expectations and reality. He basically just says you can't let that get you down, nor can you give up and stop trying to make things better.

I like Spinoza, though. I wouldn't go so far as to say "everything he says is true." He said lots of stuff that was never written down, and I'm sure he let a falsehood slip at some point.
>>3275760
>confirmed conclusion there is none.
Suggestion that we'll never find it, but that there's meaning in the effort anyway.

>> No.3275789

>>3275777
>Suggestion that we'll never find it, but that there's meaning in the effort anyway.

This is a kind of 'everything that can be invented has been invented'-kind of statement.

>> No.3275796

>>3275789
No, Camus was trying to reject absolutist logic. An Absurdist is open to the possibility that he may never have "the answer," but is not saying "the answer is forever unknowable." An Absurdist merely acknowledges that it's a difficult task with a questionable rate of success, and then makes an attempt anyway.

>> No.3275803

>>3275796
just sounds like a way of avoiding the truth ("maybe somehow even though it's literally pretty much impossible i'll find something to refute nihilism so i'll just try for that so i don't have to actually accept it") to me tbh

>> No.3275818

>>3275803
What "truth" are you referring to, and how have you come to know it? Again, the point isn't to wholly refute the nihilistic view that all is meaningless/godless/pointless/whatever. The point is to exist in the tension of the middle ground. You can reject nihilism without automatically jumping to the opposite extreme.

>> No.3275897

>>3275803

It's not avoiding truth, it's the recognition that this kind of truth can't be found out through empirical means. At least not yet. No one knows.

>> No.3276354

>>3275758
Haven't read Spinoza, but wasn't he a moral relativist regarding ethics? And that's a bad thing, right?

>> No.3277590

Autism.

>> No.3278150

>>3275476
Most heinous!!

>> No.3278181

>>3275486
Modern Philosophy: An Introduction and Survey by Robert Scruton
The Story of Philosophy by Will Durant

>> No.3278183

/lit/ confirmed for worst board. fuck off OP.

>> No.3278199

>>3278183

I dare you to name a better board.

>> No.3278203

>>3278199
/jp/

>> No.3278211

>>3278203

If your favorite parts of 4chan are autism and shitposting, I can see that, yeah.

>> No.3278214

No. Nobody can ever know. But I guess absurdism is kind of like a statement of that, so I have to pick one I guess that.

>> No.3278223

Probably some form of nihilism.

>> No.3278452

>>3275457
Epicureanism with the science part updated continually.

>> No.3278457

>>3278214
You mean Pyrrhonism.

>> No.3278489

>>3275552
Sure, but I just mean to say asking for how to get into philosophy is like asking on how to get into music if you haven't heard anything. What do you recommend such a fellow? Beatles and Rolling Stones? Bach and Beethoven? Coltrane and Mingus? Ravi Shankar? John Cage? Nirvana?

It really depends on what he is really into it and I fear that just giving all the names would only confuse the person and may end up giving up music or philosophy for being "too complicated".

I think a starting point is needed that goes beyond what we can recommend to OP. Something sparkled his interest, even if it's just "I heard that philosophy deals with existence, and that got me thinking: what does it say?..."