[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 79 KB, 480x485, 1350398102073.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3231532 No.3231532 [Reply] [Original]

>Patrician Tier
Books

>God Tier
Music

>Good Tier
Films
Paintings

>Meh Tier
Sculpture

>nope.jpg Tier
Videogames

Can we all agree on this?
>inb4 art is subjective

Pic unrelated

>> No.3231539
File: 18 KB, 444x762, art tiers.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3231539

>> No.3231556

>>3231539
Plausible.

>> No.3231555

painting is the cultural vanguard. then literature, then music, then film, then television.

brion gysing said writing is fifty years behind painting, and i think someone (perhaps godard?) once said film is fifty years behind writing.

>> No.3231561

>>3231539
I agree, Plato.

>> No.3231568

>ultra-shit tier
Internet

>> No.3231572

>>3231555

What's your favorite painting?

>> No.3231579

>mediums
>OP can't into plurals
>expects us to take him seriously

>> No.3231587
File: 27 KB, 570x399, rothko.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3231587

>>3231572

>> No.3231591
File: 643 KB, 750x606, henri matisse.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3231591

>> No.3231595
File: 463 KB, 897x1200, frank dicksee.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3231595

>> No.3231602

All lists like that are stupid.

>> No.3231604

>>3231602
You reckon?

>> No.3231607

define that
define stupid

all? that's a lot

>> No.3231609

>>3231539
>God tier: carpentry
>High tier: music, Low tier: opera
Please tell me this is a troll.

>> No.3231641
File: 26 KB, 550x550, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3231641

>>3231609
>implying Beethoven's 5th is more beautiful than this chair

Classist wanker.

>> No.3231663

>>3231607

Makes as much sense as:

1.Dan Brown
2.Radiohead
3.Stanley Kubrick
4.Gustave Doré
5.Benvenuto Cellini
6.Torotoro Resistance

<s>Cause it should be 6. -> 1. in this case</s>

>> No.3231664

>>3231641
That chair sucks.
I bet it can't even sing.

>> No.3231666
File: 27 KB, 348x490, Joan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3231666

I think music and literature are in the right place because how easy they are to create. I love vidya and film but due to the money investment required it is hard to create something unique

>> No.3231667

>>3231641

A chair is not art. If you can sit on something, it's not art.

>> No.3231669

>>3231532
>Patrician Tier
Books, Music, FIlms, Paintings, Sculptures, Video Games and everything else

>> No.3231675

No, because of all of those are valid forms of art.
>Good Tier
Books, Music, Film
>Meh Tier
Everything else
>2young2judge tier
Video Games.

>> No.3231681

>>3231669
could you be any more <s>anti-edgy?</s>

>> No.3231714

God Tier:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zn7-fVtT16k

>> No.3231722

>mediated by language
>patrician tier

choose one

>> No.3231727

>>3231669
Cease with your relativist bullshit.

>> No.3231731
File: 40 KB, 600x424, octochair3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3231731

>>3231667
Why not?

an item's functionality does not preclude [whatever it is you think makes art art]

http://www.notcot.com/archives/2011/01/maximo-riera-octopus-chair.php

>> No.3231750

>>3231731
That's a sculpture. It is therefore high tier, not god tier.

>> No.3231751

Retarded thread.

>> No.3231756

>>3231532

so by your rationale something like Harry Potter would trump, say, the Mona Lisa.

You're one stinking great toggaf, you know that, OP.

>> No.3231781

>>3231750
no, it's a chair. You sit in it. It just looks nice and costs £35,000

>> No.3231805

>>3231781
In that case my book is also a chair. I sit in it.

>> No.3231815

>>3231805
>I sit in it.
you sit....in your book?
you monster.

Also, no your book is not a chair, because its primary purpose is not for sitting in.

>> No.3231828

>>3231815
>>3231805
>>3231781
>>3231756
>>3231751
>>3231750
>>3231731
>>3231727
>>3231722
>>3231714
>>3231681
>>3231675
>>3231669
>>3231667
>>3231666
>>3231664
>>3231663
>>3231641
>>3231609
>>3231607
>>3231604
>>3231602
>>3231595
>>3231591
>>3231587
>>3231579
>>3231572
>>3231568
>>3231561
>>3231556
>>3231555
>>3231539
>>3231532
FAGGOT TIER

>> No.3231843

>>3231828

>2012
> unsecured trip

>> No.3231847

>>3231815
I made my book. I bound it myself.
Who are you to tell me that my own creation's primary purpose is different than what I designed it to be?

>> No.3231853

>>3231666
le spooky get

>> No.3231855

OP, you are the reason that /lit/ is getting deleted.

>> No.3231865

You can't just put tastes and hobbies into a ratings chart, bud. Your assburgers are burning

>> No.3231904

>>3231587
Either a synesthetic or a 2avantegarde4you asshate. Which is it.

>> No.3231914

>>3231666
Best film ever. amiright

>> No.3231948

>>3231539
for comics: see Alan Moore.

>> No.3233203

>>3231855
This

>> No.3233261
File: 111 KB, 520x285, splatter_art[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3233261

>>3231532
just because no one's made a videogame where you masturbate to various german philosopher's or listen to some family from the 1950s bitch about their problems yet doesn't mean videogames can't be art

>> No.3234210

>>3231847
yes, authorial intent is dead