[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 136 KB, 900x900, skinny.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3177123 No.3177123 [Reply] [Original]

What does /lit/ think of /mu/?

>> No.3177128
File: 49 KB, 486x473, welcome to :lit:.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3177128

>> No.3177144

You wouldn't even date /mu/ if she was a qt gf?

>> No.3177181
File: 105 KB, 593x592, litmu.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3177181

:3

>> No.3177182

Easily one of the worst chan boards I've browsed - it has fair competition, though

>> No.3177188
File: 21 KB, 300x392, Hunter-S.-Thompson-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3177188

>>3177181

We're the male board in this relationship, hombre.

>> No.3177193

>>3177182
They seem to read a lot more than /lit/, that's for sure.

>> No.3177194

>>3177181

>/mu/ is dressed like Holden

This cartoonist was trolling hard.

>> No.3177195

>>3177181
Look how qt they are together, lit is super qt 8/10 would cuddle.

>> No.3177197

get out

>> No.3177198

GY!BE is a pretty cool guy, OP.

>> No.3177196

>>3177123
nice album

now GTFO

>> No.3177199

>>3177193

Are you kidding?

The 'readers' I've ran into on the board are usually Orwell or Nietzsche fans - and don't appear to read more often than your average high schooler.

Don't get me wrong, the situation is much the same on /lit/, but there is a touch more of the good with the bad on this board, and saying /mu/ reads MORE than /lit/ is absurd

>> No.3177202

>>3177194

Actually it makes sense, given that as the patrician (lol) board, they're likely to view others as beneath them/phoney.

>> No.3177205

Poor taste in music, even the classical and jazzfags there lack competency.

>> No.3177217

>>3177199
>Implying /lit/ reads at all when it can just look up books on Wikipedia and troll itself.
If must be your first day here.

>> No.3177224

>>3177217

>If must be your first day here.

I'd say the same for with you these sad baits of yours.

>durr /lit/ doesn't read hurrrr

>> No.3177234

It's a terrible fucking board filled with terrible fucking people.

>> No.3177237

I disagree with a lot of the /lit/ Canon, but I can usually see the merit in significant books.

I disagree with most of the /mu/ Canon, and when people describe what's so great about some lame album they worship that I'm not into, my reaction is usually "woop-dee-fucking-doo".
I'm honestly more of a /mu/tant than an e/lit/ist, though.