[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 20 KB, 233x307, 070820_r16504_p233.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3054641 No.3054641 [Reply] [Original]

I've been told by a lot of people that I would really enjoy the work of Philip K. Dick. So...simple question...where should I start?

>> No.3054665

He is a great sci-fi author. Alot of books are major films now. Minority Report and A Scanner Darkly. I suggest to read Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep. Blade Runner is based of that book.

>> No.3054670

>>3054665
> Alot of books are major films now.

This is usually a terrible sign.

'A lot' is two words, btw.

>> No.3054677

do androids dream of electric sheep? is the best one to start with.

He is a terrible writer but a great idea man

>> No.3054676

His earlier books are more conventional. Near the end of his life, he started having visions, which had a massive impact on his work. A Scanner Darkly is my favorite. Solar Lottery and Friends from Frolix 8 were p. cool as well.

>> No.3054690

>>3054677
For science fiction, he isn't that bad. He had a distinct style, unlike Clarke or Niven.

>> No.3054712

>>3054670
Not always. Most books-to-movies are pretty bad but then again they are pretty far from the books anyway. And occasionally you get a gem like Blade Runner (again, different from the book)

>> No.3054718

>>3054712
A Scanner Darkly was really close to the book. Downey Jr. was great and Keanu Reeves is my favorite actor. Linklater is nice director.

>> No.3054726

>>3054677
Seriously, I love Blade Runner but Electric Sheep is fucking horrible.

>> No.3054728
File: 55 KB, 358x469, fruitsalad.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3054728

>>3054718
>Keanu was my favorite actor

>> No.3054734

>>3054726
I thought Blade Runner wasn't as good as the book.
>>3054728
It's strange, no one else seems to think he's any good. I like his stoic, physical style of acting.

>> No.3054743

>>3054726
The book had a lot more depth in the characters and more interesting story. The movie had pew pew, ford, and tears in rain.

>> No.3054744
File: 183 KB, 430x576, Can't tell if trolling or just stupid.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3054744

>>3054734
>his stoic, physical style of acting.

wat

>> No.3054750

>>3054744
For example, in that ``What does the scanner see?" monologue, the way he carries himself across the room is just amazing. Exactly how I imagined it when I read the book.

The part with Bruce was really poignant too.

>> No.3054772

start with Valis. won't regret it

>> No.3054773
File: 102 KB, 450x528, ma1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3054773

>>3054734
>I like his stoic, physical style of acting.

>> No.3054804

Reeves can't act for shit but he seems to be a bro. Dustin Hoffman can act but he manages to convey the impression of being an insufferable faggot within 3 seconds of his appearance.

>> No.3054886

>>3054743
>The book had a lot more depth in the characters and more interesting story
Oh please, don't even start with the 5deep7u shit.
>>3054734
Seriously? I put off watching Blade Runner for years because that book put such a bad taste in my mouth.

>> No.3054908

>>3054886
>don't even start with the 5deep7u shit.
Do you even know what 'depth' means in that context? He didn't intend to say that it was too confusing or meaningful for you to understand, but that it had more intricate detail.

Irrelevant to that argument, that something went over your head isn't a reasonable cause to dismiss something as shit.
And if you read about as well as you've demonstrated, it might not take much to go over your head.

>> No.3054981

>>3054772
VALIS is great, but don't start with it.

>> No.3055013

>>3054981
what would you suggest?

>> No.3055016

Ubik is a good book to start with. It incorporates a lot of PKD's themes. If you don't like it you probably won't like his other work.

>> No.3055024

>>3054743
While I also think the book is far superior, that "tears in the rain" is so so good. I get misty eyed every time.

>> No.3055065

>>3055013
Probably Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep, UBIK, or A Scanner Darkly. They're all good. Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep is pretty solid, pretty fun, and fairly standard Dick, so if you're planning on reading much of his other books go for that. UBIK is fun because of the mind-bending twists, but it might be a bit too surreal for some. A Scanner Darkly is probably his best novel, but it's a bit more serious than some of his others.

VALIS is really great but it's definitely not for everyone so I'd only really recommend it to fairly serious fans of Dick or people who are already into that sort of convoluted psychological po-mo stuff.

>> No.3055069

The Man in the High Castle.
One of my favorite books.
But it might just be because I'm into alternate history and dystopian fiction.

>> No.3055078

>>3055069
This. FUCKING THIS.

>> No.3055081

>>3055069
I read that one when I was a kid.
I still love it now, that book never gets the credit it deserves.

>> No.3055086

>>3055081
Philip K. Dick doesn't get a lot of credit because if you don't write like a Modernist schizophrenic then you're a pulp fiction hack.

>> No.3055092

I started with The Man In The High Castle, then I read Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep. I very much liked both.
Next up is Flow My Tears, The Policeman Said, then Ubik. I've often heard people recommend reading those first as well.

>> No.3055098

>>3055092
>Flow My Tears, The Policeman Said
My second favourite of his.

His short stories are very good too, I didn't care much for Ubik and Valis, but that's just me.

>> No.3055102

>>3054718
I think the film addaption did a pretty good job

>> No.3055103

>>3055086
But he DOES write like a pulp fiction hack. His ideas are great but his prose not so much.

>> No.3055106

Mr Cock is a really awful writer. The dialogue was embarrassing. Why bother digging the man's ideas out of that turd bowl?

Just read philosophy or proven fiction.

>> No.3055121

>>3055106
>Why bother digging the man's ideas out of that turd bowl?
>read philosophy
Reading philosophy is digging ideas out of a turd bowl because, while it might be brilliant, actual philosophical essays are hard work and, frankly, rather boring. Dick presents similarly interesting ideas in a (subjectively) fun way, so I read him and authors like him instead.

>> No.3055128

Valis is the only Dick I've read, but I absolutely adored it. I've heard a lot of people say that it's not really representative, especially when compared to his earlier stuff, which makes me hesitant to try and read more for fear that it won't live up to Valis for me.

>> No.3055131

when your friends said "i bet you'd like dick" i don't think they were talking about the author

>> No.3055135

>>3055128
His other stuff is completely different (except possibly the post-VALIS stuff but I haven't read it). The only one I'd really recommend you try is A Scanner Darkly, which is similarly unrepresentative but in a different way.

>> No.3055266

>>3055103
>>3055106
I think you're mistaking Mr. Dick with Kilgore Trout.

>> No.3055338

>>3055266
Funny you should say that: when I first read SH5 the description of Trout lined up almost perfectly with how I imagined Dick, except that Dick (eventually) became successful.

>> No.3055384

>>3055338
I'd like to imagine that we measure books more on how they elicit things in other people than whether or not their "writing" lives up to the standards inculcated in us by education. I'm sure I would've liked Kilgore Trout's books as well, if only for a larf.

>> No.3055405

No love for The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch? Goddamn I love that book. Really creepy and fun to think about.

>> No.3055409

read The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch if you've ever done psychadelics before

>> No.3055418

>>3055409

That book was hailed as THE LSD book for a long time--even though Dick had not done psychedelics at the time of writing it. He actually only did LSD once and, of course, had an awful paranoid trip.

>> No.3055454

>>3055418
He did read a lot about psychedelics before he wrote it, though. Which was apparently enough because that reading book is the closest thing you can get to tripping without ingesting anything.

>> No.3055480

Flow my Tears, The Policeman Said is fantastic, and a better starting point than I was expecting.