[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 29 KB, 250x352, sartre.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3029825 No.3029825 [Reply] [Original]

Whats your take on Sartre? A communist, extentialist. a philoshopher of his time.
I read some of his novels when I was a kid and was taken by them... today.. not sure

>> No.3029856

>>3029825
>a philoshopher of his time.

nigga wayta? the guy was a lost XIX century cheap philosopher out of his time.

>> No.3029859

communist ayn rand

>> No.3029907

He copped his good shit from Heidegger and did perverted things with it

>> No.3029963

>>3029825
If he hadn't been a Communist, he wouldn't have been famous

>> No.3030006

>>3029825
From a pure historical view, he was one of the most influential philosophers in the 20th century. He carried on the tradition of phenomenology and was greatly influenced by Heidegger. He was not really a communist, as anyone would know if they read his book, "Existentialism is A Humanism". I would say his ideas and philosophy lack the rigor of analytic philosophers, but it is easy to overlook his illogical tendencies in some respects. I suggest reading at least the book I mentioned above, just to be familiar with his work.

>> No.3030009
File: 49 KB, 520x657, Simone de Beauvoir.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3030009

>>3029963
Just because YOU wouldn't have noticed, doesn't mean a damn.

>> No.3030019

>>3030009
yum

>> No.3030028

>>3030009

You are the worst namefag/tripfag on /lit/, and that's saying something.

>> No.3030039

>>3030028
Hello Married Oldfag

Had to delete the nudity. Some mods will ban for that.

>> No.3030047

Sartre was a hack who made a career out of misreading Heidegger. He wasn't even the smartest person in his own bed.

>> No.3030061

>>3030039

No I'm serious. You're either a very elaborate troll or so shitty that you manage to take all of the shittiest qualities of /lit/ posters and shit them together into one shitrageously shitty identity. I suspect that there are actual several posters operating under the same monicker, each specializing in a particular area of shittiness. I'd filter your posts but I'm morbidly interested in how impossibly, perfectly shitty you are. So I guess keep it up?

>> No.3030117

just because

>> No.3030129

he has a lot of works on acclaimed authors of his time and i appreciate them

the one's on faulkner are especially good i felt