[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 242 KB, 1500x1000, Bloom.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2854211 No.2854211 [Reply] [Original]

>>Nihilism is invented by Shakespeare, and Dostoevsky knows it. Indeed I would argüe myself, and the right-wing critics in this country would be very angry at me for saying, they imply it very clearly: I think Shakespeare is a nihilist, ultimately, and that he is the greatest nihilistic writer, you know, in the West, and that ultimately our literature is nihilistic because of Shakespeare. As to whether Cervantes is ultimately nihilistic, I am not
prepared to say. I think one could make an argument that perhaps he is, which is what Unamuno I think is secretly saying —he's always on the verge of saying, it's what Nietzsche says. They're not willing to cross over. Why is Nietzsche not in the book? Nietzsche and Emerson and Kierkegaard, those three writers, are far more important to me
personally than Tolstoy is. They are much more important to me than, say, Montaigne or Moliere are

>> No.2854214

where is this from

>> No.2854236

>>2854214
http://rua.ua.es/dspace/bitstream/10045/5391/1/RAEI_09_12.pdf

>> No.2854238

>>2854211
>Nihilism is invented by Shakespeare
I... I... Fuck. No. Why do people respect Bloom?

>> No.2854245

Wow, I bet he lurks on /lit/

Seriously his thinking is about as valuable as the average /lit/erary shit-poster.

>> No.2854246

>>2854238
care to respond with something more substantial?

>> No.2854247

>>2854246
No.

>> No.2854250

Nihilism was never invented. It was simply a term used to describe the transistory phase of teenage atheists who didn't know how to tackle the question 'meaning' of life.

>> No.2854264
File: 44 KB, 1000x1000, 1227974137279.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2854264

>argüe

>> No.2854279

Wait, does Bloom seriously boil everything down to a right-wing left-wing political dichotomy. Why even mention "the right-wing" when discussing Shakespeare and weather or not he's a Nihilist?

>> No.2854315
File: 445 KB, 500x281, 1336189546222.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2854315

>>2854238
>>2854245
>Bloom so stupid
Is it that strange, knowing Bloom's theory of influence, to see him trace the nihilism in Dostoevsky back to Shakespeare? I can't even say he'd be absolutely wrong in doing so (chars like Hamlet, Macbeth and Raskolnikov, Kirilov
It's like saying Sterne was post-modernist. I don't like it, but I can definitely see why one would argue the point.

>>2854279
I don't even know which country he's talking about (Spain?), or how one should interpret this transcript. Are the critics implying?

>> No.2854319

>>2854247
so you have no point too make. bloom is right. thanks.

>> No.2854338

>>2854315
There are people that argue that Hamlet and Don Quixote were the first works of postmodern. Really academics need something else to classify to justify their existence.

>> No.2854342

> Why is Nietzsche not in the book?
What's he talking about?

And whatever. He's not saying anything that I'd want to strongly disagree with, but that's because he's not saying much to begin with.