[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 27 KB, 251x357, ForrestGump2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2843064 No.2843064 [Reply] [Original]

All through the South I had been made aware again and again of the magnificence of a recent past. The days of the great plantations bequeathed to the brief and bleak pattern of our American life a color and warmth suggestive, in certain ways, of that lurid, violent epoch in Europe known as the Renaissance. In America, as Weeks Hall puts it, the great houses followed the great crops: in Virginia tobacco, in South Carolina rice, in Mississippi cotton, in Louisiana sugar. Supporting it all, a living foundation, like a great column of blood, was the labor of the slaves.

The very bricks of which the walls of the famous houses are made were shaped by the hands of black people. Following the bayous the landscape is dotted with the cabined shacks of those who gave their sweat and blood to help create a world of extravagant splendor. The pretensions which were born of this munificence, and which still endure amidst the soulless ruins of the great pillared houses, are rotting away, but the cabins remain. The black man is anchored to the soil; his way of life has changed hardly at all since the great debacle. He is the real owner of the land, despite all titular changes of possession. No matter what the whites say, the South could not exist without the easy, casual servitude of the blacks. The blacks are the weak and flexible backbone of this decapitated region of America.

>> No.2843073

Write like a normal (fucking) person please.

>> No.2843077

dont feed the troll

>> No.2843081

Sounds like you're trying too hard, OP.

You've got to just let it flow, yo. "lurid, violent epoch"? Seriously?

>> No.2843084

>>2843081

Are you seriously trying to suggest that the Renaissance was not lurid and violent?

>> No.2843095

It's Henry Miller you fucking plebs.

>> No.2843097

>>2843095

That really goes to show how far this board has fallen. Henry Miller is a brilliant writer.

>> No.2843099

Only /lit/ can admire the prose of established authors while at the same time admonishing an amateur writer of following their example.
Cynical children.
Pretty decent writing, OP, though I'm no expert so I can't give you a real critique.

>> No.2843105

Oh god, this is rich.

moot should seriously consider axing /lit/.

>> No.2843106

>>2843097

Who the fuck is Henry Miller? Nobody wants to buy your books anon.

>> No.2843108

Why'd you change Negro to "black" or "black man"?

>> No.2843115
File: 65 KB, 720x540, 1341706231088.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2843115

>>2843106

Jesus fucking christ.

He wrote Tropic of Cancer and Tropic of Capricorn in the 1930s. The post by OP is from his "The Air-Conditioned Nightmare", a collection of essays published in the mid-40s.

Pic related, it's you.

>> No.2843121

>>2843105

There's decent discussion between the hours of 4:30 and 6:45 AM when the kids aren't awake.

>> No.2843147

>>2843121

I am saying this as an American, but that seems to be when the European master race comes on. Good thing I am nocturnal.

>> No.2843163
File: 265 KB, 703x406, wnotches.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2843163

>>2843147
American that's up at that time sometimes, there's no discernible shift in intelligence on this board.

>> No.2843196

sounds like nigger loving nonsense to me

>> No.2844820

bump