[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 15 KB, 180x306, 1342097808135.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2832957 No.2832957[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

If you call yourself a "libertarian", you jus't don't know shit about politics. Just sayin'.

>> No.2832962

If you call yourself a liberal, then you don't know shit about reality.

>> No.2832961

Reported. Please read the rules before posting. Rand disliked libertarians by the way. Just sayin'.

>> No.2832963

I don't call myself anything other than G-dawg. nigga.

>> No.2832965
File: 10 KB, 250x250, 1313635180077.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2832965

>comma outside quotation marks
You don't know shit about literature.
>>>/pol/

>> No.2832971
File: 203 KB, 1920x1080, 1339987404243.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2832971

>>2832965
Nicely done.

>> No.2832974

Right. And the people from Occupy who say that Karl Marx is the savior of us all and want to blame their unemployment on others, while they majored in political science and gender studies, know plenty about politics, don't they?

>> No.2832976

>>2832963
>>2832962
>>2832965
>>2832974
Why are you bumping?

>> No.2832977

>>2832974
>"Right, and the marxist jew liberal atheist pothead social sciences major strawman that only exists in my head knows a lot about politics, right?"

>> No.2832979

>>2832957
Care to elaborate? What's your stance, for example, on the cumulative market effects and sovereignty of the federal reserve?

>> No.2832980

>>2832976
captcha removed my sage

>> No.2832983
File: 33 KB, 296x289, AREIZOO.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2832983

>>2832965

THE COMMA ENCLOSED IN THE "QUOTATION MARKS" IS ILLOGICAL, IDIOT.

THE WORD "LIBERTARIAN" IS THE "TERM" WHICH OUGHT TO BE ENCLOSED IN "QUOTATION MARKS", THEN PROCEED WITH THE SENTENCE.

THE COMMA IS NOT PART OF THE WORD.

>> No.2832984

>inb4 12654 replies 754 image replies omitted

Seriously? Replying to this shit troll without a sage? Fucking morons

>> No.2832985

>>2832983
you better listen to dis nigga he knows his quotation marks

>> No.2832986

Everyone stop! Please!

>> No.2832993
File: 43 B, 1x1, wonka.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2832993

pic related

>> No.2833001

>>2832983
GO AWAY YUROFAG

IN MURRIKA WE DO IT THE RIGHT WAY AND PUT ALL PUNCTUATION IN THE QUOTATIONS

AND SINCE LIBERTARIANISM IS A PREDOMINATELY AMERICAN IDEOLOGY TODAY YOU CAN ASSUME OP IS MURKIN.

THE COMMA BEING PART OF THE WORD IS IRRELEVANT

>> No.2833024

http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/35hwmg/

>> No.2833039

>>2833024
>http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/35hwmg/
>linking a picture
>terrible meme
That was glorious.

>> No.2833047

>judging libertarians by Rand
It's a shallow, narrowminded thing to do, please avoid this. We don't compare socialists to Stalin, please return the politeness.

>> No.2833101

>>2832962

Economic or social reality?

>> No.2833119

>>2833101
either

>> No.2833121

Please delete this garbage.

>>>/pol/

>> No.2833123
File: 1.40 MB, 2893x1875, 789lty.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2833123

>>2833119

>> No.2833124

>>2832957
>jus't
nothing to learn here, folks

>> No.2833128

>>2833119

I am inclined to partly agree with you on a social level. Depending. Economically, moderate liberalism is far more successful than deregulation. Not sure how relevant this is to lit but whatever.

>> No.2833130

>>2833128
uh what? Regulation is only negative on the economy and freedom. There are no positives.

Economically, liberalism is nonsensically delusional.

>> No.2833140

>>2833130
In order for the Coase theorem to work, transaction costs have to be "negligible". In cases where transaction costs are considered to not be negligible, the Goverment puts in place regulation. This is usually the case when it's difficult to attribute blame/responsibility and the potential damage is going to affect a large number of individual claimants.

>> No.2833145

>>2833130

Do you not feel that deregulation caused the great depression and the problems we have had lately? Why do you think regulation is in place at all?

>> No.2833153 [DELETED] 

>>2833130
>Economically, liberalism is nonsensically delusional.
"Economic liberalism" does not mean what you think it means.

>There are no positives.
Yes the are, History proves that.

>> No.2833156

>>2833130
>Economically, liberalism is nonsensically delusional.
"Economic liberalism" does not mean what you think it means.

>There are no positives.
Yes there are, History proves that.

>> No.2833158

>>2833145
>Do you not feel that deregulation caused the great depression and the problems we have had lately?
NO I'VE READ MISES.ORG AND I'M QUITE SURE IT WAS THE OPPOSITE

>Why do you think regulation is in place at all?
TO LIMIT OUR FREEDOMS

>> No.2833159

>>2833145
>Why do you think regulation is in place at all?

Because big businesses and government love their profitable cartels and monopolies.

>Do you not feel that deregulation caused the great depression and the problems we have had lately?

Nope, learn 2 the business cycle.

>>2833153
I assumed we are using the american definition of liberal.

>> No.2833163

>>2833159
>Nope, learn 2 the business cycle.
Bear baiting and bull fighting.

>> No.2833167

>>2833163
Nope.
The business cycle is

Credit expansion/money printing causes a boom and malinvestment followed by inevitable crash and readjustment.

>> No.2833173

>>2833167
The solution is obvious: we must end the business cycle

>> No.2833176

>>2833173
You do this by allowing a free market in currency.

>> No.2833182

>>2833176
No, you introduce regulation that forbids business cycles.

>> No.2833187

>>2833176
a free market currency would just go to the Euro or the renminbi defacto

to say nothing of the destruction of the petrodollar

American would literally, LITERALLY collapse if it went back to hard currency

>> No.2833192

>regulation that forbids business cycles
i_have_no_face.jpg

>> No.2833195

>>2833182
kinda like how the war on drugs ends immoral drug usage?

>>2833187
ya because our economy is fundamentally flawed DUE to fiat fucking currency.

You have to let it crash and burn to fix all this. To delay the pain and the cure is to make it all worse.

>> No.2833201

why are you all replying to a (boring) /pol/ thread in /lit/
go to fucking
>>>/pol/

>> No.2833202

>>2833195
Economics from a libertarian perspective:
>Gubment: We followed your suggestions and now everything has gone to shit. We have hit rock bottom.
>Libertarian: Only way is up lol.
This is why they demand overspending on the military, in preperation for the angry masses.

>> No.2833206

>>>/pol/

>> No.2833227

>>2833202
military spending is just another form of socialism, except its directed towards important productive work of self-defense rather then coddling of the poor and lazy and criminal.

>> No.2833234

>>2833227
why waste government money on a military when criminals already have guns to protect themselves?

That's called needless redundancy.

>> No.2833238

>>>/pol/
ish

>> No.2833239

>>>/pol/
Now.

>> No.2833249

>>2833234
because if we let criminals own nukes, they'd blow up the world.

>> No.2833256

>>2833249
Who should own nukes should be decided by the free market, not regulation.

>> No.2833257

>>2833249
>>>/pol/
>>>/pol/
>>>/pol/
Please.

>> No.2833262

>>2833256
Go to
>>>/pol/
Go to
>>>/pol/
Go to
>>>/pol/
Please.

>> No.2833269

>>2833227
This is what americans actually believe.
So much fear in america. country of cowards. why do you think they clutch to their guns and religion.

>> No.2833270
File: 907 KB, 720x720, doom paul 1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2833270

RIP /lit/

>> No.2833271

>>2832965
>Implying there is a single style guide to rule them all.

>> No.2833276

>>2832974
Wouldn't blaming a society that cares only for business creation on the unemployment of those who aren't profitable to others be a perfectly sound judgement?

>> No.2833317

>>2833276
You sound like a leftist. Society is the way it is because of biological and physical imperatives, not to "oppress" you.

>> No.2833318

Oh come on just go to bloody
>>>/pol/

>> No.2833319

>>2833317
>implying biology isn't physical
Still believing in vitalism are we?

>> No.2833332

>>2833317
biological determinism in 2012 LOL
You can never be taken seriously, except around your dumbfuck hick friends. Stay inside

>> No.2833336

>>2833319
Emphasising scale differences doesn't imply spirituality, so you're an objectively stupid person if you weren't saying that in an uninspired attempt at irony.

>> No.2833338

>>2833332
>literally thinks human beings are magical

>> No.2833339

>>2832957


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDHBvQRyOr0

>> No.2833340

>>2833338
From the response you clearly don't know what 'biological determinism' actually means. You have to look it up, okay pleb?

>> No.2833341
File: 2.37 MB, 295x216, ohgodnonoyes.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2833341

>>2833336
>so you're an objectively stupid person
10/10, love it.

>> No.2833363

>>2833130
>freedom
There's that american word again.

>> No.2833369
File: 40 KB, 569x214, costanza sees all.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2833369

>>2832974
>The people who are the opposite of my political position dont know about politics
>Therefore I know a lot about politics
>The opposite of me is stupid therefore I must be smart!

I seriously hope..