[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 43 KB, 317x500, Jared M. Diamond - Guns, Germs, and Steel_ The Fa_ies (v5.0).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2624641 No.2624641 [Reply] [Original]

Is Guns, Germs, and Steel worth reading? If it helps, I'm agnostic on the "race realism" thing. And I know Jared Diamond's a jew, fuck off stormfags.

>> No.2624652

I don't think /lit/ has much in the way of stormfags. Anyway, I thought this was a good read. Read it critically, of course, but even if you don't come away convinced there are a lot of interesting facts and an interesting perspective.

>> No.2624658

>>2624652
This is how you should read any nonfiction text.

>> No.2624659

Yeah, I would say at least read it and consider his arguments. It's a well-researched, well-argued, well-written book.

Probably point out that it's been criticized from the left as well as from the right. I don't think either criticism should be taken all that seriously, but it's worth mentioning.

>>2624652
>I don't think /lit/ has much in the way of stormfags.

Sadly...

>> No.2624661

>>2624658

Yes, of course.

>> No.2624668

>>2624659
Yes, and if I may speak for all of /lit/, for I certainly believe I am representative, we hate the jews and down with all the jews and jew related races.

>> No.2624687
File: 18 KB, 265x400, Decline_of_the_West_1922.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2624687

Definitely, it's an interesting take. Read it then read the Decline and go from there.

>> No.2624702

It doesn't matter what 'race' the author is. Fucking genetic fallacy.
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/genefall.html

-

What matters is the merit of the argument/work itself. In this case, his book is nurture only which is surely wrong. However, i'm sure it offers some worthwhile interests. Obviously, genetics does not explain everything in history.

>> No.2624707

>>2624702
You are very obviously wrong for reasons that are self-evident.

>> No.2624712

>>2624707
About what?