[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 40 KB, 484x578, Heidegger_1955.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2619090 No.2619090 [Reply] [Original]

>Is e=mc2 a sexed equation?…Perhaps it is. Let us make the hypothesis that it is insofar as it privileges the speed of light over other speeds that are vitally necessary to us. What seems to me to indicate the possible sexed nature of the equation is not directly its uses by nuclear weapons, rather it is having privileged what goes the fastest.
Hey, /lit/, do you believe that this is bona fide philosophy?

>> No.2619095

Yes. I believe she is earnest in that belief.

>> No.2619098

it may or may not be, but any philosophical system that considers it relevant is not one I consider relevant. what it is is bona fide stupid, assuming it isn't malicious.

>> No.2619112

>>2619098

Agreed.

>> No.2619117

Pomo feminist marxist psychoanalysist nonsense.

http://richarddawkins.net/articles/824-postmodernism-disrobed

>> No.2619119

Why so many fucking troll threads?

>> No.2619121

>Is e=mc2 a sexed equation?
>sexed equation
>sexed
>mathematics

...

Well, fuck.

>> No.2619123

>>2619117
>>2619117

fucking lol. this actually exists? officially lost all remainging respect for dawins now.

>implying i ever had any

>> No.2619127

>>2619121

>implying mathematics isn't steeped in patriarchal overtones and phallocentric dialogue.

confirmed for troll.

>> No.2619140

>>2619090

Fuck no. I have no problem with equal rights for women, but feminist theory is complete bullshit and those cunts can go fuck themselves.

>> No.2619147

>>2619140

>complete bullshit

citation needed.

>> No.2619151

>>2619147
>>citation needed
proof by inspection.

>> No.2619153

>>2619151

I inspected your momma and I proved that she had a fat ass.

>> No.2619154

>>2619151

You're assuming there's absolutely zero truth or value in the entire ideology. Please do explain.

>> No.2619184

>>2619154
yes. prove me wrong, bring up one single instance of third-wave feminism that isn't integrally sexist. I'll even settle for relevant.

>> No.2619187

>>2619184

You're the one making a positive claim. You have the burden of proof, buddy.

>> No.2620804

>>2619187
I don't think the claim of something being bullshit can be considered positive. That's like saying atheism makes a positive claim. Not saying I agree with the person you were responding to; I was just passing through and noticed you accidentally herp-derped.

>> No.2620979

>>2620804
>>2620804

So you're basically admitting that your pathetic "rage" was nothing but hot air.