[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 142 KB, 640x960, 1332782281056.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2513116 No.2513116 [Reply] [Original]

Is Margaret Atwood a good writer?

>> No.2513121

Yes. Sage for nsfw.

>> No.2513123

Yes. Sage for juggalos.

>> No.2513129

yes she's very good but I believe that for a lot of guys her works don't cross the gender line and they find her fiction boring.

>> No.2513141

read oryx and crake

>> No.2513145

>that picture

It's funny how much "juggalettes" will objectify themselves as second-class people even amongst pathetic scum like "juggalos".

Talk about subhuman.

>> No.2513147

>>2513145
I honestly feel sorry for them. Someone of them could have done so much better.

>> No.2513151

>>2513123
>>2513145
>>2513147

You just don't understand the majesty that is ICP ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-agl0pOQfs

>> No.2513154

Alice Munro>Margaret Atwood

>> No.2513157

Women walk around like this? In public? And they are called what? Jugalettes? And why aren't we all becoming Jugallos (or something) to conquer their fresh flesh?

>> No.2513163

>>2513157
This is Gathering of the Juggalos a camp thing where juggalo bands play or some shit.

Most Juggalettes are fat and ugly.

>> No.2513172

>>2513157

>fresh

No matter what time of the day you see them they're walking around with some fat hicks cum leaking down their legs. Those bitches are the opposite of fresh.

>> No.2513180

>>2513172
Ok. But why are they naked in public? Where is that allowed?

>> No.2513181

>>2513180

Some hick place in the middle of nowhere. Who cares?

You're acting like you're never seen a naked woman before.

>> No.2513182

She's pretty good when she's not banging out the tired old misandrist memes.

>> No.2513184

question: would you pretend to like ICP to get with the girl on the right?

>> No.2513187

>>2513181
Women walking around naked in public and not being raped? What on earth. Honestly this is not the seventies anymore.

>> No.2513193

>>2513116

Ive read the edible woman, yes she can write well
and shes funny too

>> No.2513192

>>2513184
Naturally I would.

>> No.2513203

>>2513184

yea then I'd start laughing and talking shit about ICP mid moneyshot

>> No.2513209

>>2513180
>Nudists
did u heard of such thing?

>> No.2513211

>>2513184
isn't there like a maxim somewhere about how men are exempt from from criticism where there's a woman involved?

>> No.2513212
File: 268 KB, 683x1024, aHR0cDovL3d3dy4zMzNjaGFucy5vcmcvc3Qvc3JjLzEzMjkxNTU2NDQ2OC5qcGc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2513212

>>2513184
this or the other one?

>> No.2513218

>>2513116

Yes, really good. I haven't read her in a while though. Basically read all her stuff.

>> No.2513222

>>2513209
It looks like a concert though.

>> No.2513223

Don't post such pornography, there are children on this site!

>> No.2513224

>>2513212
would bang. im not a juggolo but i actually like the miracles song.

>> No.2513228
File: 42 KB, 350x234, 4504499613_cc0bfc7446[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2513228

>>2513212
>dat juicey puss filled spot between her tats

>> No.2513229

>>2513223
>nudity
>pornography

pick one

if there are children here they should comply with the board wide rules and gtfo

>> No.2513234

>>2513228
i bet she's hideous without makeup. even with it you can still make out some spots protruding through. would not bang

>> No.2513238

>>2513234
definately not

>> No.2513246

>>2513212
She looks hotter in the first pic.

>> No.2513249
File: 79 KB, 533x800, 0_4ea1d_5b0b9d83_XL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2513249

>>2513222
And you thought nudists live as hermits in their caves somewhere in forest?
Here. Check this out
http://shpengler.livejournal.com/186650.html

>> No.2513250

Stop objectifying women you disgusting pigs. This board is for literature

>> No.2513252

>>2513238
i know. i was just being hypercritical for comic effect, albeit without labelling the minor imperfections on the photo. i truth, i would put my dick in a vice just to stand next to her while jerking my pancake cock

>> No.2513253

>>2513187
In Denmark there are currently campaigns to allow people to swim in swimming baths nude/topless. That's good. I hate puritanism.

>> No.2513255

>>2513250

Stop reacting as you are biologically programmed to, you disgusting pigs.

>> No.2513258
File: 76 KB, 547x594, TATS.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2513258

any more?

>> No.2513259

>>2513250
>Posting nude females as an oppic
>complying objectifying of women

>> No.2513270
File: 42 KB, 540x350, imw0010716.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2513270

They aren't nudists, it's a fucking music festival. Haven't you guys ever watch the Woodstock movie? Naked people everywhere.

>> No.2513272

Something I really need to clarify here: is post nude children in violation of the CP board restriction?

>> No.2513273
File: 33 KB, 307x307, authors_atwood.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2513273

Margaret Atwood thread?
Margaret Atwood thread.

>> No.2513280

>>2513250
>hoebags walk around half- or fully naked
>men are blamed for "objectifying" women
typical feminazi logic right there

>> No.2513282

>>2513272
yes.

>> No.2513283

>>2513272
who the fuck reads board rules?

>> No.2513289

>>2513272
Post some and we'll see

>> No.2513291

>>2513272
there's no way to tell if they are under 18 considering all the tattoos. they could just have irresponsible parents (they are juggalettes) but you can't really say for sure.

>> No.2513656
File: 70 KB, 533x800, 1311180560569.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2513656

>>2513249

>> No.2513681 [DELETED] 
File: 832 KB, 2000x1333, Royal_0002.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2513681

>>2513289
posting because im genuinely curious to find the dividing line and because i might get banned allowing me to focus on my essays.

>> No.2513696

watch that post stay up for like 3 days

>> No.2513698

>>2513681
I'm sure you'll have plenty of time to work on your essays in jail.

>> No.2513728

I thought they were a christian band? Whats this degenerate hippie garbage?

>> No.2513734

I read the handmaid's tale and I liked it because women were put in the proper place.

>> No.2513739

>>2513698

It's not illegal to post pictures of nude children, it needs to be explicitly pornographic. Nude kids just standing there isn't porn (though people still jerk to it).

>> No.2513747

>>2513739


are you a fucken idiot? It's illegal for kids to take pictures of themselves naked, they have been charged many times

you're assuming laws are rational, they aren't specially in north america...

maybe you're in japan or europe

>> No.2513753

>>2513739
Tell that to the FBI when they search your computer and find thousands of pics of naked children on you harddrive.

>> No.2513755

>>2513739
it'll be deleted by mods tho because the difference is completely arbitrary

>> No.2513760

>>2513698
that pic is legal on the web. you google 'nudist pics' and it comes up as the fourth or fifth site. it's been up there for years

>> No.2513770

>>2513760
>that pic is legal on the web

but not in America and most civilized countries

>> No.2513778

>>2513770

Why are you just continually repeating the same thing that's been proven false.

>> No.2514445

ok why the fuck did they delete that picture but not the actual thread, what the fuck

>> No.2514714

has anyone read 'always going home'?

is it worth it? I'm new to Atwood. Only read the amazing wilderness tips collection. Which everyone should fucking read. Home looks like a super complex encyclopedia about a made-up people.

>> No.2514727

>>2513739
>Nude kids just standing there isn't porn
Not in modern day America, where CP is the most convenient scapegoat crime we have.

>> No.2514754

Crazy ass, dirty hippies. Disgusting.

Some are very pretty though.