[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 9 KB, 200x239, schopenhauer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2442111 No.2442111 [Reply] [Original]

Are there any great female authors who didn't write about love, and weren't Marxists?

>> No.2442115

Why is writing about love bad? A lot of great male writers write about love.

>> No.2442117

>great female authors
>female

That's your problem. You should know better if you actually took the time to read Schopenhauer.

>> No.2442119

>women
>knowing how to write about anything that isn't about being a whore

>> No.2442118

how old are you op?
this is not an ad homo attach just curious.

>> No.2442122

Harper Lee

>> No.2442125

>>2442122

Truman Capote wasn't a woman.

>> No.2442126

everyone posting here that woman can't write really owe to to themselves to read more women authors. what is useful about prejudice?

>> No.2442127

OP,
it sounds like you have many authors in mind.
who are they???
I have a hunch on a few....
How about some poets for starters on your pejoratively toned question:
Kim Addonizzio
Lyn Lifshin
Diane di Prima
Jenannie Pommy Vega
Anne Sexton (lol not love ALL the time anyway)
Anne Waldman (? mighta had commie tendencies)
Emily Dickinson
Naomi Shihab Nye
Patti Smith (song Birdland LISTEN TO EET)
Leslie Shapiro

>> No.2442129

>didn't write about love

you're a fucking idiot

>> No.2442133

>>2442126

>Prejudice

Yeah, because we're all equal. I mean the evolutionary process of over 100,000 years would have no barring on why women turned up inferior, but they were oppressed by evil men. Continue to buy the lie of Jewish egalitarianism.

>> No.2442139

Beauvoir

>> No.2442141

>>2442133
>evolution
Yeah, okay athiestfag.
Stopped reading right there.

>> No.2442147

>>2442133
jesus christ read some goddamn evolutionary theory.
my suggestion would be "Sex in History" by Reay Tannahill.

>> No.2442150

>>2442141

How typical for a woman (or maybe a male feminist or even a troll) to equate evolution with atheism.

>> No.2442152

>>2442150
probably just a joke

anyway, keep talking about biotruths or w/e, this is a terrible thread

>> No.2442154

>>2442150
One of those three things was correct. Figure out which one.
Also, I read from some post from some anon a few weeks ago on this board that men can't be feminists.

>> No.2442161

>>2442139
Beauvoir was a Marxist, though.

>> No.2442164

thread failed

>> No.2442162

>>2442147

I have it's called "evolutionary psychology". Alpha males selected mates who were promiscuous and stupid. Then a bunch of the "inferiors" ganged up on the Alphas and forced the notion of the nuclear family. Of course, it can take literally thousands of years to change the psychology of women.

It's proven that women have lower IQs than men:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/4183166.stm

I would recommend reading Sex and Character by Otto Weininger.

>> No.2442165

>>2442162
lol, good satire man, really summed all that dumb shit people are always sperging on about in one post

>> No.2442167

>>2442161
Was not. Define Marxist. I feel like you accuse everybody who's liberal of being a Marxist.

>> No.2442168

>>great female authors who didn't write about love, and weren't Marxists
Ayn Rand
YEAAAAAAAAAAAH

>> No.2442170

>>2442162
Or just Darwin:

Without the higher powers of the imagination and reason, no eminent success can be gained in many subjects. These latter faculties, as well as the former, will have been developed in man, partly through sexual selection,- that is, through the contest of rival males, and partly through natural selection,- from success in the general struggle for life; and as in both cases the struggle will have been during maturity, the characters gained will have been transmitted more fully to the male than to the female offspring. It accords in a striking manner with this view of the modification and re-inforcement of many of our mental faculties by sexual selection, that, firstly, they notoriously undergo a considerable change at puberty, and, secondly, that eunuchs remain throughout life inferior in these same qualities. Thus man has ultimately become superior to woman. It is, indeed, fortunate that the law of the equal transmission of characters to both sexes prevails with mammals; otherwise it is probable that man would have become as superior in mental endowment to woman, as the peacock is in ornamental plumage to the peahen.

>> No.2442173

>>2442167
I'm pretty sure she's self-admittedly Marxist. So is Sartre. They're both some of the biggest French Marxists. Marx.

>> No.2442174

Sexual Personae by Camilla Pagilla. It's about how great men are and how women can't create good literature. It's pretty hilarious as a response to feminists, especially considering it's written by a woman.

>> No.2442176 [DELETED] 

most people speaking of feminism assumes all women are equal not only that they are equal to men. women have opportunities that they always had and everything else. Men still die earlier. They are all nothing more than receptacles for cum.

>> No.2442179

Tove Jansson, Barbara Comyns, Liliana Ursu, Olga Tokarczuk, and Leonora Carrington are some great ones I've read recently who didn't exclusively write on love and I'm pretty sure weren't Marxists.

>> No.2442182

can you take the he-man woman hater's club stuff back to /r9k/ and post about books

thanks

>> No.2442183

>>2442173
Nu uh.

>> No.2442188

>>2442182
>authors

One who composes or writes a book; a composer, as
distinguished from an editor, translator, or compiler.

>> No.2442189

>>2442182

How typical for the person to be complaining about this fail to capitalize anything in his post.

>implying the majority of these people aren't from >>>/pol/

>> No.2442193

>>2442191

Babby's first troll

>> No.2442191

>>2442188
so post about authors, then

please note: posting about evopsych and how women are inferior to men is not the same as "posting about authors"

>> No.2442196

>>2442191

>please note: posting about evopsych and how women are inferior to men is not the same as "posting about authors"

Well I suppose it lends credibility to the argument that female authors are incapable, regardless of how shitty this thread is in general.

>> No.2442198

>>2442191
>Darwin
>not an author
>Weininger
>not an excellent author
>Vilar
>not an author
>Camille Paglia
>not an author
>Roy Baumeister
>not an author

>> No.2442201

>>2442198
durhduhurhudhurrudrrr

>> No.2442202

>>2442201
another excellent post from the jewish feminist