/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.2429001]

Hey /lit/,
I am currently writing an essay for my English class and I want to fail it for reasons I won't explain.
I plan on making this a crowd sourced essay so I can be avant garde. I promise to put every post into my essay, even if it is just people saging me.
Ready for some "fun" /lit/?

[Anonymous No.2429007]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_capital

Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive?
http://www.csom.umn.edu/assets/71520.pdf

Sexual Economics: Sex as a Female Resource for Social Exchange in Heterosexual Interactions
http://www.csom.umn.edu/Assets/71503.pdf

Cultural Suppression of Female Sexuality
http://www.femininebeauty info/suppression.pdf

Female polygyny
http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pgen.1000202
http://www.jstor.org/pss/2743334
http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v41/n1/abs/ng0109-8.html

In the history of mankind as a species, some hundreds of thousands of years, 40% of men have successfully passed their genes to future generations, whereas 80% of women did. Today's human population is descended from twice as many women as men. This is statistical, scientific, genetic proof that women function as sexual selectors, and men evolved risk-taking and ambition behaviours to compete for mating rights. The study was conducted by Michael F. Hammer. A lecture on the implications:
http://www.psy.fsu.edu/~baumeistertice/goodaboutmen.htm

Esther Vilar's seminal work on the concept that women enjoy a parasitic relationship with men.
http://www.naturalthinker.net/trl/texts/Vilar,Esther/ManipulatedMan.html The text itself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Esther_Vilar&oldid=442296393 Synopsis.
http://www.theabsolute.net/misogyny/vilar.html A preview.

Female characters are defined more by their passive attributes and their emotional responses; male characters more by their actions. This is why male protagonists are preferred in fiction, by both women and men.
http://www.onfiction.ca/2011/02/actor-and-observed-man-and-woman.html

[Anonymous No.2429009]

Culture sees men as expendable blank slates, whose self-sufficiency is their own responsibility, and who must prove themselves worthy of accolade or interest. Conversely, women are inherently valuable, but typically function as inert commodities or motivation for male actors. The TVtropes links serve as quantitative evidence that this basic dichotomy proliferates the culture, to the point that it can be casually and humorously catalogued.
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/GenderDynamicsIndex
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/MenAreTheExpendableGender

"Without the higher powers of the imagination and reason, no eminent success can be gained in many subjects. These latter faculties, as well as the former, will have been developed in man, partly through sexual selection,- that is, through the contest of rival males, and partly through natural selection,- from success in the general struggle for life; and as in both cases the struggle will have been during maturity, the characters gained will have been transmitted more fully to the male than to the female offspring. It accords in a striking manner with this view of the modification and re-inforcement of many of our mental faculties by sexual selection, that, firstly, they notoriously undergo a considerable change at puberty, and, secondly, that eunuchs remain throughout life inferior in these same qualities. Thus man has ultimately become superior to woman. It is, indeed, fortunate that the law of the equal transmission of characters to both sexes prevails with mammals; otherwise it is probable that man would have become as superior in mental endowment to woman, as the peacock is in ornamental plumage to the peahen."
Charles Darwin

[Anonymous No.2429022]

What I have so far.
Half of the link I will use as apa reference without citing the used portion

[Anonymous No.2429036]

[Anonymous No.2429069]

>>2429036
>British spelling of color
>Not using the oxford comma
What the fuck type of hybrid are you?

[Anonymous No.2429075]

>>2429022
Wow, you were smart enough to intro it as "To quote". I was hoping you would get been kicked out for plagiary.

But this looks like a bullshit assignment anyway so I don't think it will really matter or result in your failing it, it is probably only going to be checked for completion.

[Anonymous No.2429077]

>>2429036
>herewegoagain.jpeg

[Anonymous No.2429079]

[Anonymous No.2429102]

http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/PPPL1.pdf
>The culture-only (0% genetic–100% environmental) and the hereditarian (50% genetic–50% environmental) models of the causes of mean Black–White differences in cognitive ability are compared and contrasted across 10 categories of evidence: the worldwide distribution of test scores, g factor of mental ability, heritability, brain size and cognitive ability, transracial adoption, racial admixture, regression, related life-history traits, human origins research, and hypothesized environmental variables. The new evidence reviewed here points to some genetic component in Black–White differences in mean IQ. The implication for public policy is that the discrimination model (i.e., Black–White differences in socially valued outcomes will be equal barring discrimination) must be tempered by a distributional model (i.e., Black–White outcomes reflect underlying group characteristics).

[Anonymous No.2429108]

http://www.colorofcrime.com/colorofcrime2005.pdf
>Many people believe that a bad social environment is a major contributor to crime. They believe that if people of all races had the same education, income, and social status, there would be no race differences in crime rates. Academic research, however, shows that these differences persist even after controlling for social variables.

>Figures 14 through 17 show correlations for the 50 states and Washington, DC, between rates of violent crime reported to the police in 2002 and different social factors. In all the charts, the highest point is Washington, DC. A positive correlation can vary from zero to one, and the steeper the trend line, the higher the correlation and the stronger the association. The graph with the steepest trend line and highest correlation, Figure 14, compares violent crime rates to the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic. The other graphs show that there are relationships between violent crime and other social factors, but the correlations are much weaker.

>In fact, the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic accounts for crime rates more than four times better than the next best measure: lack of education. Furthermore, even controlling for all three measures of social disadvantage hardly changes the correlation between racial mix and crime rates. The correlation between violent crime and the percentage of the population that is black and Hispanic is 0.78 even when poverty, education, and unemployment are controlled, versus 0.81 when they are not. In layman’s terms, the statistical results suggest that even if whites were just as disadvantaged as blacks and Hispanics the association between race and violent crime would still be almost as great.

[Anonymous No.2429118]

>>2429036
I have gotten to here so far while checking sources and citing them.

[Anonymous No.2429122]

http://digilib.bc.edu/reserves/sc563/mcgu/sc56310.pdf
>Many lay persons and professionals believe that child sexual abuse (CSA) causes intense harm, regardless of gender, pervasively in the general population. The authors examined this belief by reviewing 59 studies based on college samples. Mela-analyses revealed that students with CSA were, on average, slightly less well adjusted than controls. However this poorer adjustment could not be attributed to CSA because family environment (FE) was consistently confounded with CSA, EE explained considerably more adjustment variance than CSA, and CSA-adjustment relations generally became nonsignificant when studies controlled for FE. Self-reported reactions to and effects from CSA indicated that negative effects were neither pervasive nor typically intense, and that men reacted much less negatively than women. The college data were completely consistent with data from national samples. Basic beliefs about CSA in the general population were not supported.

[Anonymous No.2429144]

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v11/v11p251_Butz.html
>I see three principal reasons for the widespread but erroneous belief in the legend of millions of Jews killed by the Germans during World War II: U.S. and British troops found horrible piles of corpses in the West German camps they captured in 1945 (e.g. Dachau and Belsen); there are no longer large communities of Jews in Poland; and historians generally support the legend.

>During both world wars, Germany was forced to fight typhus, carried by lice in the constant traffic with the East. That is why all accounts of entry into the German concentration camps speak of shaving of hair and showering and other delousing procedures, such as treatment of quarters with the pesticide Zyklon. That was also the main reason for a high death rate in the camps, and for the crematoria that existed in all.

>When Germany collapsed in chaos, then of course all such defenses ceased, and typhus and other diseases became rampant in the camps, which quartered mainly political prisoners, ordinary criminals, homosexuals, conscientious objectors and Jews conscripted for labor. Hence the horrible scenes, which however had nothing to do with "extermination" or any deliberate policy. Moreover, the West German camps involved were not the alleged "extermination camps," which were all in Poland (e.g. Auschwitz and Treblinka) and which were all evacuated or shut down before capture by the Soviets, who found no such scenes.

The "Final Solution" spoken of in the German documents was a program of evacuation, resettlement and deportation of Jews with the ultimate objective of expulsion from Europe. During the war Jews of various nationalities were being moved east, as one stage in this Final Solution. The legend claims that the motion was mainly for extermination purposes.

[Anonymous No.2429149]

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v11/v11p251_Butz.html
>I see three principal reasons for the widespread but erroneous belief in the legend of millions of Jews killed by the Germans during World War II: U.S. and British troops found horrible piles of corpses in the West German camps they captured in 1945 (e.g. Dachau and Belsen); there are no longer large communities of Jews in Poland; and historians generally support the legend.

>During both world wars, Germany was forced to fight typhus, carried by lice in the constant traffic with the East. That is why all accounts of entry into the German concentration camps speak of shaving of hair and showering and other delousing procedures, such as treatment of quarters with the pesticide Zyklon. That was also the main reason for a high death rate in the camps, and for the crematoria that existed in all.

>When Germany collapsed in chaos, then of course all such defenses ceased, and typhus and other diseases became rampant in the camps, which quartered mainly political prisoners, ordinary criminals, homosexuals, conscientious objectors and Jews conscripted for labor. Hence the horrible scenes, which however had nothing to do with "extermination" or any deliberate policy. Moreover, the West German camps involved were not the alleged "extermination camps," which were all in Poland (e.g. Auschwitz and Treblinka) and which were all evacuated or shut down before capture by the Soviets, who found no such scenes.

>The "Final Solution" spoken of in the German documents was a program of evacuation, resettlement and deportation of Jews with the ultimate objective of expulsion from Europe. During the war Jews of various nationalities were being moved east, as one stage in this Final Solution. The legend claims that the motion was mainly for extermination purposes

[Anonymous No.2429164]

http://www.sdh-fact.com/CL02_1/67_S4.pdf
>Is it possible that, in the late 1930s, the brutality of young Japanese men was such that it caused them to stand out from their counterparts in the rest of the world?

>According to charges brought at the Tokyo Trials, after having occupied Nanking in December 1937, Japanese soldiers laid waste to the city, hunting down women and raping them, and killing all civilians who crossed their paths. In the brief span of one month, they committed 200,000 murders and 20,000 rapes. At that time conscription was universal. A soldier on active duty might have been — indeed, was — the boy next door. The soldiers of 1937 belonged to my father’s generation. I certainly feel an affinity with them, and I found the notion that they committed any such crimes, much less many of them, unimaginable.

[...]

>I failed miserably, however, in my attempt to verify any of the accusations made at the Tokyo Trials. None of the former soldiers I interviewed mentioned any event even remotely resembling them. During discussions about Nanking, some interviewees digress, shifting to the bitter conflict fought in Shanghai. Others mentioned the Battle of Imphal in India; the veterans’ recollections of combat in that region were sharper, since it had taken place after the Battle of Nanking. However, the accusations made by the prosecution at the Tokyo Trials described crimes so horrific that no soldier could forget them, no matter how long ago they had occurred. I concluded that the charges brought at the tribunal had been invented.

[Anonymous No.2429207]

>Thus it stands to reason that the most superior form of human being is the male homosexual, as they are able to resist the purely physical, sexual, urge for female companionship and create deeper emotional and intellectual relationships with their fellow males, relationships which intellectual and emotionally benefit each partner far more than any heterosexual relationship could hope to. It is my fervent belief that every intelligent male should aspire to be homosexual.

[Anonymous No.2429211]

>>2429207
stick that in after one of your chauvinism bits

[Anonymous No.2429225]

http://www.counter-currents.com/2011/04/the-measure-of-greatness/
>April 20 of this year [1989] is the 100th anniversary of the birth of the greatest man of our era — a man who dared more and achieved more, who set his aim higher and climbed higher, who felt more deeply and stirred the souls of those around him more mightily, who was more closely attuned to the Life Force which permeates our cosmos and gives it meaning and purpose, and did more to serve that Life Force, than any other man of our times.

>And yet he is the most reviled and hated man of our times. Only a few tens of thousands of men and women, in scattered groups around the world, will celebrate his birthday with love and reverence on April 20, while all of the scribblers and commentators of the controlled news media, the controlled politicians, and the controlled churchmen will pour out their hatred and venom and lies against him, and those lies will be believed by hundreds of millions.

[Anonymous No.2429237]

http://www.jimgoad.net/pdf/violence/lets.pdf
>Women are only good for fucking and beating. When you get tired of fucking them, there’s only one thing left to do. After you fuck them, they start talking. That’s when you beat them. They all talk too much, especially when you don’t want to hear it.

>And what do they talk about? Violence toward women. But they fail to realize that their whining is what provokes most of the violence. They don’t understand what their eternal screeching does to men. Shut up! We don’t need to hit you. Just shut your mouths.

>One simple rule, guys—the first time she gives you some lip, bust it open WIDE. She won’t talk shit again. Not if she’s smart, she won’t. Smack her mouth so hard, she won’t be able to open it for a month. It’s difficult to bitch and moan and nag with a broken jaw, isn’t it? Your fists are a judge’s gavels. When she’s in contempt, pound down on her until there’s order in the court. Don’t let her get away. Make her pay for being a woman.

[Anonymous No.2429248]

Asspies flinging feces into the face of this stupid essay while devouring monkey intestines.

[Anonymous No.2429249]

>>2429207
I'm adding the Japanese part right after the end of the line.
What I haev so far

[Anonymous No.2429279]

faggots ove oranges because of the owl complexe they use to understand the bus because they can do but are reliving they pigeons bus are do.

[Anonymous No.2429304]

I like to lick the discharge on my grannies panties.

[Anonymous No.2429451]

Will OP deliver?

[Anonymous No.2429475]

>Don't reach for the sky when I know there are footprints on the moon

[Anonymous No.2429480]

>>2429475

Sorry, meant "don't tell me to reach for the sky..."

[Anonymous No.2429481]

Fucking jiggaboo nig nogs keep stealing my bike.

[Anonymous No.2429492]

i have just finished masturbating to a popular transexual called bailey jay. you might have heard of her/him. she/he has a nice penis and great tits. i came hard.

i love you and want you to know that i imagine your face instead of bailey jay's. i bet you have a marvellous penis.

[Sebastian Lyons !tEapFcFYdE No.2429528]

Then I guess that was the moment of conclusion for me - the sexual awakening; I liked ladyboys. I like ladybugs too and I thought about my not seeing them from years.

[Anonymous No.2429543]

Maybe all ladybugs had turned into ladyboys, I mused to myself. Would those ladyboys in turn become ladymen? The so-called shemales everyone looks down on? I didn't mind and masturbated another time on shemale-porn, blowing my load on a printed picture of you, that is right, of you.