[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 21 KB, 360x453, 1323134650762.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2403647 No.2403647 [Reply] [Original]

What's /lit/'s opinion on Salman Rushdie?

>> No.2403651

salmon is good for sandwiches.

also: why are you reading shit by non-whites?

>> No.2403655

>>2403647
Only read Midnight's children, 'twas good.

>> No.2403657

Terrible..like Henry Miller, Norman Mailer and just about everyone else that was seen as edgy by the baby boomers.

>> No.2403660

>>2403657

Is there anything the baby boomers didn't ruin?

>> No.2403662

Never read him. Seems like kind of an attention whore; nobody cares about your Khomeini fatwa anymore.

>> No.2403663

>>2403660
No, Nothing. Gen Y has a lot of work to do but unfortunately we can't be arsed.

>> No.2403664

>>2403657
except that norman mailer is actually good.

>> No.2403666

>>2403664

Go back to bed, grandpa.

>> No.2403668

>>2403664
Prove it. Have you actually read anything he wrote? It's talentless, uninspired and just generally boring.

>> No.2403675

>>2403668
lol at "Prove it"

>> No.2403682

>>2403668
i've read all of the authors you mentioned, and agree that rushdie and miller are overrated and skippable. norman mailer's "the naked and the dead" is, however, worth reading.

>> No.2403708

The best contemporary writer there is I think- sometimes he moves things a fraction too slowly.