/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.23846265]

>be me
>reading Hegel
>tfw Geist (Spirit) is evolving through history
>Hegel says history is the unfolding of freedom
>mfw egirls are now part of this "freedom"
>egirls on twitter are the dialectical synthesis of OnlyFans and Instagram models
>first, there was thesis: real girls in school
>then antithesis: models, influencers >unreachable, filtered perfection
>synthesis: egirls
>blend both worlds into the "accessible-yet-unreachable" paradox
>egirls now transcend individuality
>they’re the Absolute Geist
>Hegel says we achieve true freedom through the state
>our state is literally ruled by egirls now
>they’re on every platform, reshaping the "cultural fabric" like some kinda Hegelian juggernaut
>imagine Hegel seeing this shit
>"The owl of Minerva flies at dusk"
>"The egirl of Minerva Posts until rent is paid
>mfw egirls have become part of the final historical synthesis
>tfw I’ve finally understood Hegel

[Anonymous No.23846283]

kill yourself you stupid simp nigger

[Anonymous No.23846298]

>>23846265
>>Hegel says history is the unfolding of freedom
Well turns out Hegel is wrong. What a revelation :^)

[Anonymous No.23846356]

>>23846265
>tfw I’ve finally understood Hegel
The test is to take what you think are three of his good ideas, rewrite those ideas in your own words, and show your rewrites to a math major with a 4.0 GPA, asking for debate. /lit/ has never had a Hegel reader like that, so you'd be a welcome addition.

[Anonymous No.23846402]

>>23846265
>thesis, antithesis, synthesis

[Anonymous No.23846418]

>>23846265
>the E-Girl is determinately negated by the presence and quantity of simps and simpbux, and the absence of physical/social proximity with and to simps
>Yet if she snares Chad to simp for her in person, he performatively ceases thereupon to be Chad
>the Simp pays not for content, but for fear of lack of content icons of idolatrous onanism more simps = higher incentive to E-Girl to remain an E-Girl.
>Chad is ever in peril of a surfeit of content, and becoming a Simp without the consolation of a refund (or worse, financial liability to the E-Girl).
>from the aspect of eternity, this is all necessary and good

[Anonymous No.23846916]

>>23846265
>first, there was thesis
>then antithesis
>then antithesis
Way to prove you've actually never read him.

[Anonymous No.23846920]

>>23846265
>first, there was thesis
>then antithesis
>synthesis
Way to prove you've actually never read him.

[Anonymous No.23847582]

>>23846265
I’m sorry; when does Hegel talk about "thesis, antithesis, and synthesis" in phenomenology of spirit or any other works?

[Anonymous No.23847655]

>>23846265
Egirls are a part of women's freedom, absolutely. But they have an antithesis. A sexual awakening in men, and the disillusionment with monetary transactions. Two genders, both with self-worth, making a choice on what the synthesis will be.

[Anonymous No.23847659]

>>23847655
Is a men's sexual awakening even possible or will it just turn into MGTOW garbage after they inevitably terrify every woman away from them?

[Anonymous No.23847776]

>>23846265
>tfw you realize Hegel was wrong
The Holy Spirit is the same Holy Spirit as it is God and thus unchangabe in its essence. It does not evolve. Stop reading enlightenment propoganda. We have to deal with this total depravity of the society because of (influencers) like him.

[Anonymous No.23847790]

>>23847776
If you say so, bud..

[Anonymous No.23847836]

>>23847790
>mfw nobody has any grounded moral, philosophic, or theological understanding
I bet medieval peasents had a more solid understanding of these things than modern man