[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 80 KB, 568x852, IMG_2665.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23683438 No.23683438 [Reply] [Original]

We are so back.

Calling for a revival of intellectual intuition in metaphysics long after its banning by Kant, Kenneth Rose overcomes the forgetfulness of being through contemplative ontology.

Rose argues for the reinstatement of intellectual intuition in metaphysics long after its banning by Kant. His claim is not merely the conclusion of a thought-experiment or of an exercise in conceptual analysis. It is the result of the contemplative recognition of being with a meditatively concentrated intellect: nous in Greek and buddhi in Sanskrit. Recognizing intellectual intuition as a long-neglected faculty of philosophical insight, Rose shows how it can result in an immediate, intuitive discerning of being. He discusses how being parcels itself out into the intellectual forms providing the underlying nonphysical arrangement of the physical and mental worlds.

By reviving the use of intellectual intuition in metaphysics, Rose draws upon historical sources across multiple Asian and Anglo-European philosophical schools. This is a work of contemplative constructive philosophy that breaks down divisions between science, philosophy, and religion and between diverse cultures and divergent worldviews.

>> No.23684756

>>23683438
the turning are tables.

>> No.23684765

>>23683438
HYLICS BTFO!!!!

>> No.23684843

This thread has 1 poster

>> No.23684844

>long after its banning by Kant
????
Literally the whole Jungian school uses intuition

>> No.23684847
File: 29 KB, 235x310, IntellekuellerAnschauer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23684847

>>23684843
I'd like to think my years of Intellektuelle Anschauung posting contributed to this dawning Zeitgeist.

>> No.23684850

>>23684844
actually read Kant to know what intellectual intuition is

>> No.23684867

>>23683438
Didn't Deely, Pierce, Husserl, Sokolowski, etc. already fix this by recovering the ideas of the ancients and Scholastics via semiotics and phenomenology?

Of course it's back, it never left. You always had guys like Ulrich and Pryzwara, and guys who at least didn't totally fall for bad modern philosophy like Gadamer (or even dare I say Heidegger, even though he is still mostly wrong).

Plus we had guys like C.S. Lewis, Charles Lewis, and Chesterton to point out the incoherence of modernity and bring back the classical tradition.

>> No.23684877

>>23684867
And yet Kit Fine is a leading Anglo "metaphysician"

https://youtu.be/YINgcjTKfKU?si=HZm2dnfFxq3hgPXy

>> No.23685097

>>23684844
Jung wasn’t a philosopher in the commonly accepted definition, he was a mystic and psychologist.

>> No.23685138

>>23684877
>I hate continental philosophy
>ok but why tho
>uh.. uh.. because I JUST DO OK

>> No.23685187

>>23684877
kino channel. anals btfo themselves.