/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.23515915]

Who's the better writer?

[Anonymous No.23515946]

Martin by far, Stephen King is like the McDonalds of literature

[Anonymous No.23515947]

Well the other actually writes

[Anonymous No.23515951]

>>23515915
Martin in general but king has better plots.

[Anonymous No.23515956]

King while on coke > Martin (pre Epstein island visits) > King sober > Martin now (aka not writing) > King (drumpf derangement)

[Anonymous No.23515959]

>>23515915
King finished what he started

[Anonymous No.23515960]

>>23515956
>pre Epstein island visits
what

[Anonymous No.23515975]

>>23515959
Who cares? He's writes notoriously bad endings to his stories. King is a slop factory

[Anonymous No.23515995]

All of King's stories are basically "[thing] but evil"
what if cars were evil? Christine
what if clowns were evil? It
what if bubbles were evil? Under the Dome
what if fan girls were evil? Misery
what if fan hotels were evil? The Shining
etc.

[Anonymous No.23515999]

King's stories are basically "[thing] but evil":
what if cars were evil? Christine
what if clowns were evil? It
what if bubbles were evil? Under the Dome
what if fan girls were evil? Misery
what if hotels were evil? The Shining
etc.

[Anonymous No.23516020]

george

[Anonymous No.23516064]

>>23515946
This

[Anonymous No.23516282]

>>23515915
Both are slop, but King's fiction is much more enjoyable; his characters have personality, his plots are deranged and dreamlike (sometimes in a good way), and his fictional worlds are vibrant and imaginative. Martin's books on the other hand feel much more meticulously thought-out but somehow lifeless; his stories feel incredibly boring, all his characters are somewhat believable but completely despicable. Even the supernatural elements in Martin's book seem to lack all mystique and sense of wonder.

[Anonymous No.23516286]

>>23516282
*Martin's books

[Anonymous No.23516305]

>>23515946
Reddit take