/lit/ - Literature

[Literal Schizo No.23391084]

what literature will replicate the feeling of a girl loving and caring for you and making you feel like you have a reason to exist

[Anonymous No.23391092]

Enver Hoxha: Selected Works

[Literal Schizo No.23391095]

>>23391092
DAYUM

[Anonymous No.23391160]

>>23391095
What state atheism does to a nigga

[Anonymous No.23391214]

>The love bestowed by the man is the standard of what is beautiful and what is hateful in woman.

>In love, man is only loving himself. Not his empirical self, not the weaknesses and vulgarities, not the failings and smallnesses which he outwardly exhibits; but all that he wants to be, all that he ought to be, his truest, deepest, intelligible nature,

>The lover, who is so easily fooled by the unconscious simulation of a deeper comprehension on the part of his sweetheart, may believe that he understands himself through a girl; but those who are less easily satisfied cannot help seeing that women only possess a sense of the fact not of the individuality of the soul, only for the formal general fact, not for the differentiation of the personality. In order to perceive and apperceive the special form, matter must not itself be formless; woman's relation to man, however, is nothing but that of matter to form, and her comprehension of him nothing but willingness to be as much formed as possible by him ; the instinct of those without existence for existence. Furthermore, this " comprehension" is not theoretical, it is not sympathetic, it is only a desire to be sympathetic ; it is importunate and egoistical. Woman has no relation to man and no sense of man, but only for maleness ; and if she is to be considered as more sexual than man, this greater claim is nothing but the intense desire for the fullest and most definite formation, it is the demand for the greatest possible quantity of existence.

>the idea of pairing is the only conception which has positive worth for women. The woman is the bearer of the thought of the continuity of the species. The high value which she attaches to the idea of pairing is not selfish and individual, it is superindividual, and, if I may be forgiven the desecration of the phrase, it is the transcendental function of woman.

>The effort of woman to realise this idea of pairing is so fundamentally opposed to that conception of innocence and purity, the higher virginity which man's erotic nature has demanded from women

>match-making is nothing else than this. The sexuality of women is super-individual, because they are not limited, formed, individualised entities, in the higher sense of the word.

>Pairing is only possible because woman is not a monad, and has no sense of individuality; the endless striving of nothing to be something.

>Thus comes about the domination of the male sexuality over the female. It is only when man is sexual that woman has existence

>Her existence is bound up with the Phallus, her supreme lord and welcome master.

>Sex, in the form of man, is woman's fate ; the Don Juan is the only type of man with complete power over her

>Sexuality and love, the one by a bodily image, the other by an image of the soul. But it is only the man of genius who can approach this entirely unsensuous love, and it is only he who seeks to produce eternal children in whom his deepest nature shall live for ever.

[Anonymous No.23391249]

>>23391084
>loving and caring for you
????
women love
-alcohol
-sex
-money
-gossip
-public posturing

that's all. Women don't even love their kids. Kids are just a tool for them in order to smother them, play the helicopter mom, and delude themselves they are not loathsome. Women can replace biological or non-biological fathers in an heartbeat.

You really have to understand women do only 2 things:
-with men they have sex
-and among women, they talk about the sex they had with men

that's 100% the life of a woman .

[Anonymous No.23391318]

no book will do this. enough of your offtopic BS

[Anonymous No.23391332]

fuck you for reminding me this vapid frog whore exists

[Anonymous No.23391339]

>>23391249
Dumb incel

[Anonymous No.23391352]

>>23391339
You can call him an incel, but you can't say he's wrong

[Anonymous No.23391384]

>>23391352
He's obviously wrong lol. Sure, all people, including women, have opportunist qualities to them, but to say that women are unable to love human being is just delusional. I guess it could be argued that love and care aren't completely exempt from certain selfish qualities either and as such never wholly unconditional, but as I see it that would implicate men as well...

[Anonymous No.23391393]

>>23391084
Oblomov when he is dating the bitch, stop reading when he start doubting it

[Anonymous No.23391428]

>>23391249
You are gone. Come back. Go to Church.

[Anonymous No.23391510]

>>23391084
Infinite jest

[Anonymous No.23391532]

>>23391214
Rees Mogg lookin nibba

[Anonymous No.23392615]

Just watch anime man