[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 3.31 MB, 2706x1553, Luigi_Mussini-_Leonardo_da_Cutro_e_Ruy_Lopez_giocano_a_scacchi_alla_corte_di_Spagna.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23256642 No.23256642 [Reply] [Original]

Who of the OG Church Fathers has the most systematic, lucid and "STEM friendly" way of writing and philosophizing?

>> No.23256644

>>23256642
> STEM friendly
kys bug

>> No.23256673

>>23256642

STEM friendly? You've already gone horribly wrong. Repent, sinner.

>> No.23256682

I've have yet to find any sort of "STEM friendly" explanation of religion.

>> No.23256689

>>23256682
There is none. STEM and sterile begin with the letters s, t, and e so there’s probably a bit of etymological commonality there.

>> No.23256694

>>23256689
and it has the m of maggot so it means “sterile maggot”

>> No.23256718

>>23256644
>>23256673
>>23256682
I meant as in writing style. Schopenhauer is a "modern" example, his writing is lucid and clear and "STEMy", which makes sense since he took a lot of medicine and physics classes.

>> No.23256767

>>23256718
Rather than Church Fathers, it would be better to look for Neothomists, if that's what you want.

How good is your Aristotle and your Plotinus?

>> No.23256876

>>23256767
Aristotle is decent
Plotinus is nill

>> No.23256894

>>23256876
I think reading Plotinus will help you understand them.

>> No.23257246

>>23256642
Read Summa Theologica.

>> No.23258100
File: 1.67 MB, 4000x3000, 20240213_091446.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23258100

ఈ స్థలం ఇప్పుడు నా టాయిలెట్.