[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 608 KB, 673x680, 20231215_095941.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23193212 No.23193212 [Reply] [Original]

What modern (say, 1980s onwards) books do you consider on the same tier as the classics?

>> No.23193219

>>23193212
Captain Underpants

>> No.23193443
File: 147 KB, 715x1100, image0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23193443

>>23193212
>modern (say, 1980s onwards)

OP, that’s decades after modern

>> No.23193492
File: 25 KB, 469x385, 1710659410866393.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23193492

>>23193212
>1980s onwards) books
>on the same tier as the classics

>> No.23193646

>>23193212
Any book what you like. Literature and literary criticism are subjective. For me George Martin's ASOIAF is better than Homer's works, for example.

>> No.23193657

>>23193646
/tv/ shitters really did a number on this board

>> No.23193663
File: 89 KB, 259x388, George_Mills_book_cover.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23193663

>>23193212

>> No.23193665

>>23193657
that's an interesting subjective belief.

>> No.23193693 [DELETED] 

>>23193657
I read ASOIAF in the mid 2000s.

>> No.23193699

>>23193657
I read ASOIAF in the mid 2000s and never watched the TV show.

>> No.23194253

>>23193657
that's a response you'd get from someone who actually enjoys reading instead of jerking themselves off over how intelligent they are for reading "classics."