/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.23151003]

>Our Critique would be an investigation utterly superfluous, if there existed a possibility of proving a priori, that all thinking beings are in themselves simple substances, as such, therefore, possess the inseparable attribute of personality, and are conscious of their existence apart from and unconnected with matter. For we should thus have taken a step beyond the world of sense, and have penetrated into the sphere of noumena

>The permanence of the soul, therefore, as an object of the internal sense, remains undemonstrated, nay, even indemonstrable. Its permanence in life is evident, per se, inasmuch as the thinking being (as man) is to itself, at the same time, an object of the external senses. But this does not authorize the rational psychologist to affirm, from mere conceptions, its permanence beyond life.

I think the answer is obvious (which again shows Kant's subtle suggestion presented to the reader subliminally and between the lines): INTELLEKTUELLE ANSCHAUUNG

In other words, all thinking being is related to corporeal being always and therefore must possess a sensibility, but this corporeal being does not necessarily have to be the gross matter of waking life-- mind stuff of intellektuelle anschauung remains possible.

[Anonymous No.23151010]

>OP gets totally blown the fuck out while making an original post that isn't a kant quote >>23147665
>goes back to posting only Kant quotes
Glad you know your place, midwit. GG.

[Anonymous No.23151020]

>>23151010
>my posts constantly remind it of it's metaphysical ineptitude
All you know is seething. It's all you have.

[Anonymous No.23151028]

>>23151020
>my posts constantly remind it of it's metaphysical ineptitude
ESL or seething so hard (You) forgot English grammar. Impressive!

[Anonymous No.23151071]

>>23151028
*woosh*