[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 19 KB, 305x475, 22478.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23073593 No.23073593 [Reply] [Original]

*blows up your entire understanding of reality*

>> No.23073624
File: 40 KB, 640x398, 1707893150453203.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23073624

>>23073593
Amazing book, reality will never be the same

>> No.23073659

>>23073593
Jaynes was debunked. Next

>> No.23073664

>>23073659
>Jaynes was debunked.
Source? I'd like to read a response to the book. Scholarly engagement with it seems lacking from both ends.

>> No.23073666
File: 257 KB, 589x896, 1707765245429684.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23073666

>>23073659
Society is guided towards empty shit like Taylor Swift and guided away from intense, thought-provoking material like Julian Jaynes.

Only by going back to schizo can we actually be closer to God

>> No.23073669

>>23073666
>Only by going back to schizo can we actually be closer to God
your post started off so well

>> No.23073683
File: 184 KB, 784x799, 1706899769703915.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23073683

>>23073669
Fuck off

>> No.23073687

>>23073666
Taylor Swift is good

>> No.23073697
File: 35 KB, 264x400, 885547.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23073697

>>23073593
What's the prerequisite knowledge required to actually gain anything from it? A Gen-Psych class?

More or less than this?

>> No.23073715

>>23073697
Personally, before tackling the book I decided to pregame with the entire fiction and non fiction western canon, the entire history of philosophy, and 25 years of graduate schooling, starting with particle physics and ending with the seminary.
But i'd say you'd be able to understand the book with a good high school education.

>> No.23073724

>>23073593
Jung already wrote all about this.

>> No.23073725

>>23073724
(not true, by the way)

>> No.23073728

>>23073593
amazing read
>>23073724
such as?

>> No.23073732

>>23073725
>>23073728
Jung's collective unconscious and his archetypes is just the bicameral mind but less retarded

>> No.23073742

>>23073732
not even close

>> No.23073750

>>23073742
Jung's collective unconscious and his archetypes is just the bicameral mind but only a little bit less retarded.
Is that closer?

>> No.23073761

>>23073750
Jung deez