/lit/ - Literature

[Anonymous No.23008050]

Is this just leftist propaganda?

[Anonymous No.23008072]

>>23008050
That's what happens when you let trannies decide what constitutes a valid source.

[Anonymous No.23008077]

>>23008050
It's gotten absurd at this point

[Anonymous No.23008078]

>>23008050
Anyone else live through the transition of teachers saying "never ever use wikipedia anyone can edit it" to them just telling you to look shit up on wikipedia all the time and reading off of it to the class

[Anonymous No.23008085]

>>23008050
How could it be? Anyone is allowed to point out logical fallacies and a lack of evidence on any page.

[Anonymous No.23008087]

>>23008050
I wish it was. The world needs more leftist propaganda so chuds can learn to be civilized and not be resentful incels

[Anonymous No.23008088]

Yes. /thread

[Anonymous No.23008089]

>>23008088
faggit

[Anonymous No.23008094]

>>23008085
Subtle stuff, like reading about the history of some topic and there will be completely irrelevant non-white/women figures used as examples at every point

[Anonymous No.23008096]

>>23008085
This is why, they garbage like the New York Times be a source, which is about as credible as fox news.

[Anonymous No.23008114]

>>23008085
You should see the pages on race and IQ.

Here is an FAQ on the talk page.
>What about all the psychometricians who claim there's a genetic link?

>The short answer is: they're not geneticists. The longer answer is that there remains a well-documented problem of scientific racism, which has infiltrated psychometry (see e.g. [5] and [6]). Psychometry is a field where people who advocate scientific racism can push racist ideas without being constantly contradicted by the very work they're doing. And when their data did contradict their racist views, many prominent advocates of scientific racism simply falsified their work or came up with creative ways to explain away the problems. See such figures as Cyril Burt, J. Phillipe Rushton, Richard Lynn, and Hans Eysenck, who are best known in the scientific community today for the poor methodological quality of their work, their strong advocacy for a genetic link between race and intelligence, and in some cases getting away with blatant fraud for many years.

These people are perfectly fine with discrediting an entire field of psychological science, and nowhere in the FAQ do they even mention the hereditarian elephant in the room, Arthur Jensen. This is because he is the person almost singlehandedly responsible for reviving research into possible hereditarian links (and research into g in general), and they find it very difficult to slander him.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3ARace_and_intelligence

[Anonymous No.23008117]

>>23008089
No

[Anonymous No.23008132]

>>23008050
I hate that website
jus brainwashing 101

can't say that cultural appropriation has a bias torwards white men interacting with culture

can't say that the six death cames didn't kill 1 million each

or that zyklon only works with heat and water and takes ages and is only for mosquito eggs

[Anonymous No.23008138]

some of the info on wikipedia is good. it's all licensed under creative commons so someone should create a text based splinter that can adjusted to promote a less biased point of view.

[Anonymous No.23008139]

all the crap it says about slavery too

litterally jus abolitionist acting crazy around slaves gets them on there

[Anonymous No.23008157]

>>23008050
Reality has a leftist bias...

[Anonymous No.23008158]

>>23008050
For relatively “neutral” (at least politically) subjects, they can be a godsend, have very well-done and sometimes fascinating overviews of a historical event, scientific term, a historical figure’s life, a philosophical system of thought, etc. It’s when you get to relatively more topical stuff like “impeachments of Donald Trump” or “COVID-19” (and subtopics/sub-articles like “COVID-19 global pandemic responses” and “COVID-19 vaccinations” etc.) that you’ll get into increasingly heavily propagandistic stuff, yes. And yet other politically charged topics/articles of famous politicians/etc. will often be a means of propaganda or a P.R. enterprise, as well as of course pages on topics Wikipedia dubs a “conspiracy theory” (like “New World Order (conspiracy theory)”, “Chemtrail conspiracy theory”, “9/11 conspiracy theories”, etc.) At this point, it becomes not so much a matter of specifically “leftist” propaganda, but more like globalist politically-correct agenda aligned with the Western nations.

I’m certain there’s also examples of Wikipedia becoming a breeding-ground for interests as diverse or sometimes opposing as Russian, Chinese, Israeli, Palestinian, etc. to try to subtly get their agenda across in how certain topics are discussed, historical/current events, figures, wars, etc. without making it seem 100% evident and provable that some pro-Russian/Chinese/Israeli/Palestinian/etc. shill is behind it.

[Anonymous No.23008167]

>>23008157
No, reality deals in facts therefore it has a rightwards bias

[Anonymous No.23008169]

>>23008050
I have a working theory that all Wikipedia pages written about or related to contemporary politics is written by government agents. There is no other explanation. No normal person would go through the effort of writing pages of such unbridled propaganda. Wikipedia is literally The Democrat Interpretation of History, I almost want to say that Hillary Clinton is fucking writing it

[Anonymous No.23008200]

>>23008157
>>23008167
retards
>>23008169
depends on the page. the famous autist who got bullied online for being a nolife wikipedia editor voted trump iirc

[Anonymous No.23008214]

>>23008169
>No normal person would go through the effort of writing pages of such unbridled propaganda
this is true but they aren't government agents. I have been banned many times from wikipedia for posting cobs. every time the moderator that banned had a discernible identity they were a tranny

[Anonymous No.23008255]

>>23008157
Umm, no? Leftists spend most of their time falsifying reality regardless of their ideological background.

[Anonymous No.23008259]

>>23008169
Joe Biden's page is basically regime propaganda. It's astonishing.

[Anonymous No.23008267]

>>23008050
Dunno but people there definitely have a bias. I’m sure it swings in a myriad of ways depending on article and editors, but there have been times where I’ve seen them simultaneously dilute one article and pump up another. These people will have multiple degree verifications and I can’t help but laugh, as if I needed more evidence that a degree means nothing and most of them are twats.

[Anonymous No.23008273]

Before and after damaging Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic Party interests.

[Anonymous No.23008278]

>>23008050
I’m a wiki editor and I’m in the discord chat and I can confirm every other user is a tranny (you can tell because they proudly use the troon colors in their avatars).

[Anonymous No.23008286]

>>23008085
>logical fallacies
Bing bing wahoo reddit

[Anonymous No.23008301]

>>23008273
I would really like more images and examples of how the bias became more prevalent after 2016 because it's extremely noticeable.

[Anonymous No.23008311]

>>23008050
Did you guys know they’re hiding and removing any mention of Jewishness in the early life sections of Jews? Look at the recent case of this criminal Jew:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Bankman-Fried

[Anonymous No.23008327]

>>23008311
Other examples of kikery? Look how hard the Israel shills tried to prevent the renaming of the article from “Allegations of war crimes against Israel” to “Israeli war crimes”:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Israeli_war_crimes#Requested_move_11_October_2023

The good side won thank God.

[Anonymous No.23008360]

>>23008311
If its not in early life it'll be in personal life.

[Anonymous No.23008382]

100% unbiased page about the Spanish Civil War.

[Anonymous No.23008390]

It used to be a bunch of left-liberal leaning nerds making a collaborative wikipedia, now it's seen as one of the "pillars" of online information control (alongside search engines and social media), as 95% of the world gets its information through a) hearsay from social media, b) googling it, c) clicking the first "trusted" URL, which is always wikipedia. For these reasons, it like everything else is heavily monitored and controlled by lobbying groups and by government agencies.

[Anonymous No.23008394]

They repeatedly tried to remove Bill Clinton and others from Epstein's page until Jimbo Wales intervened and locked it.

[Anonymous No.23008397]

>>23008273
Typical. I knew someone who knows Jimbo, and the rumor I heard is that it's totally taken over by interests and there's nothing he can do about it.

[Anonymous No.23008402]

They also couldn't delete the page on Communist killings, but at least 50% of it was removed or moved to minor pages (where it could be more easily deleted).

[Anonymous No.23008426]

>>23008382
Anon, don't you know? As long as you cite an NPR article or some shitty social science book from a leftist then that means it's accurate, factual information

[Anonymous No.23008448]

>>23008426
What shocked me the most is how in the last paragraph they try to discredit Stanley Payne, probably the most respected Hispanist in the world, by associating him to McCarthy. And this type of absolute bullshit isn't removed.

[Anonymous No.23008455]

>>23008448
>>23008426
Before letting it get to you too much, remember that this is yet another manifestation of the looming competence crisis, the system has produced people who do this for a living and nothing else. Basically HR ladies + snarks whose entire job is using weasel words and exploiting the permissiveness of existing liberal systems to manipulate information.

They're just commie apparatchiks like in the late USSR and its satellites. Everybody knew this type of person back then, they're sinecured party members who can't do anything else.

[Anonymous No.23008468]

jsyk, wikipedia trannies read these whiny, ineffectual forums and laugh. they know what they are doing and they know you are powerless to stop them. leftists are just better organized, probably because they are less scrupulous and more intelligent.

[Anonymous No.23008490]

>>23008455
Their fanaticism makes them worse than the average Stalinist bureaucrat. A far-left Wikipedia editor once searched for my personal info because of a mere disagreement about certain political sources. He managed to delete a fully-sourced 40,000 bytes page because it was based on "conspiracy theories", without further explanation.

[Anonymous No.23008494]

>>23008157
>>23008167
It has neoliberal bias if anything

[Anonymous No.23008510]

Another 100% unbiased page about Spanish history.

[Anonymous No.23008514]

[Anonymous No.23008517]

>>23008468
This bait is so obvious that if anyone responds other than to say "kys tranny" I'll feel bad for them.

[Anonymous No.23008520]

>Opposition to gay marriage is based on claims such as that homosexuality is unnatural and abnormal, that the recognition of same-sex unions will promote homosexuality in society, and that children are better off when raised by opposite-sex couples. These claims are refuted by scientific studies, which show that homosexuality is a natural and normal variation in human sexuality, that sexual orientation is not a choice, and that children of same-sex couples fare just as well as the children of opposite-sex couples.[15]
Well, I guess that settles it! The science says that gay people are just born that way and are pre-destined to be married

[Anonymous No.23008525]

It bans all primary sources and the list of approved news sites is all USA neoliberal rags. So you have a leaked email that the state department says is verified but because New York Times wrote an article saying the US government did nothing wrong it's authoritative. Nobody takes Wikipedia seriously, especially not outside the USA.

[Anonymous No.23008529]

>>23008520
It's amazing how much of a difference 5-10 years makes, this kind of categorical language is self-evidently inappropriate for Wikipedia in my ears. But that's because I was raised by 90s and 2000s culture that still maintained at least the illusion of impartiality and the marketplace of ideas and all that.

I wonder what happens to a generation when it grows up only having experienced mutually exclusive claims to truth with no middle ground and no qualifying statements like "This is how I see it." Just "This is refuted." That's a subtle tonal shift in how information is even perceived.

[Anonymous No.23008533]

It also has that classic leftist thing where it deletes anything written by non-leftists about leftism no matter how correct they are. It's downright comical. When they say it in their words it's true, when anybody else writes it down it's antisemitic conspiracy theories.

https://www.marxists.org/subject/frankfurt-school/index.htm

[Anonymous No.23008541]

>>23008514
lmao if you guys want to these two faggots are some of the worst scum on the website:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rsk6400
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Generalrelative

[Anonymous No.23008542]

>>23008520
>that the recognition of same-sex unions will promote homosexuality in society
>These claims are refuted by scientific studies
This isn't even disingenuous, its just retarded.

I basically only ever use wikipedia when checking when exactly some historical figure lived/died. I hope at least that is still accurate (baring some obvious exceptions like Jesus or Kim Jong Un)

[Anonymous No.23008546]

>>23008541
want to know*

[Anonymous No.23008551]

>>23008541

[Anonymous No.23008590]

communist killed my neigbors family because they had money and someone was in the army

so now i listen to leftist shitfessors tell me communism was a good thing and that everybody had it easy

[Anonymous No.23008597]

>>23008050
Always has been. It can be useful in some ways, but the bias is as rampant as it is repugnant. I'm a big fan of the "Early Life" section, though.

[Anonymous No.23008603]

>>23008085
And the moderators are free to ignore it and ban your IP for pointing it out.

[Anonymous No.23008606]

>>23008597
It’s unfortunately being subverted. See>>23008311

[Anonymous No.23008609]

>>23008157
>that's why we have to ban everyone who posts facts that we don't like

[Anonymous No.23008619]

>>23008114

The page on the Hunter Biden laptop scandal was earlier chacterized in the title name with softer language, until the preponderance of evidence absolutely forced them to re-think the article title.

The fundamental problem with Wikipedia as a paradigm is the consensus thing. It's a feminine (and therefore wrong) ethic. As with all things, it has some value, but must be taken critically.

[Anonymous No.23008621]

>>23008311
>>23008606
Gradually, I began to hate them.

[Anonymous No.23008643]

>>23008050
It's propaganda for whatever stance the press in your language has. The Croatian one is infamously full of neo-nazis, for example.

[Anonymous No.23009814]

>>23008132
Did you try editing it?

[Anonymous No.23009846]

>>23008050
Can't believe no one has posted this yet. Yeah I'll link it because who gives a fuck:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump

Look at all the negative and reductive language on this. Every other sentence designed to be as defamatory as possible. Anyone who isn't fucking stupid can readily see the obvious bias, and it's one of the most popular articles on the site.

[Anonymous No.23010067]

>>23008311
>>23008360
Personal life section does indeed begin:

>Bankman-Fried is vegan. He was raised in a Jewish family.

But it's clearly a conspiracy against all the highfallutin intelekchewals on this board who wouldn't ever be so stupid as to bother reading past the lead. I propose that every wikipedia article should begin with an explicit reminder that jews, in fact, exist. Just in case people forget.

[Anonymous No.23010072]

>>23008050
A rule of thumb is that the more sources appended to the end of a paragraph, the more pozzed the author's neghole.

[Anonymous No.23010139]

>>23009846
>Anyone who isn't fucking stupid can readily see the obvious bias
You are giving too much credit to the average person in our consumer oriented civilization anon

[Anonymous No.23010336]

>>23010072
In the "Biden-Ukraine conspiracy theory" page there are fourteen sources to a single period in the first paragraph.

[Anonymous No.23010347]

>>23008157
Yeah, that's why you dysgenic freaks crash and burn wherever censorship is not present.

[Anonymous No.23010368]

>>23010139
The covid hysteria really opened my eyes to this. I already had a pretty negative view of human nature, but the tyranny and people's reaction to it really shattered any illusions I had left about people and how they value their autonomy. What bothered me wasn't the government being tyrannical, I expected that. It wasn't even that people would bow to the tyranny, because I understand that. What was really shocking was how quickly people jumped at the chance to become mini-tyrants themselves,the IT GOES OVER THE NOSE crowd, and how they basically begged the government to become more tyrannical and take away more of their rights, all over the common fucking cold.

[Anonymous No.23010400]

>>23010368
>What was really shocking was how quickly people jumped at the chance to become mini-tyrants themselves

This really explains it all in my opinion. It was a chance for losers to exert power over others while also signaling about how moral they are.

[Anonymous No.23010414]

>>23008085
The french article for Great replacement is a good example on how formulation completely changes the impact is has on the reader

>Earliest version from 2014
"The Great Replacement is a political neologism introduced by the French far-right writer Renaud Camus in 2010. It primarily refers to the idea that European populations are being replaced by populations of Maghrebi and Sub-Saharan origin, as a result of both legal and illegal immigration. Subsequently, it also encompasses all the ensuing consequences on the political, cultural, and spiritual levels, namely the replacement of European civilization with that of the migrants."
https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Grand_remplacement&oldid=104797075


>Now
""The Great Replacement is a far-right conspiracy theory introduced in 2010 by the French writer Renaud Camus. It is based more on impressions than on actual demographic data and is biased by xenophobic and racist mistrust. The theory claims that there is a process in France and Europe of substituting the French and European population with a non-European population, primarily from Sub-Saharan Africa and the Maghreb. This process would lead to a change in civilization, allegedly supported or even organized by a political, intellectual, and media elite labeled as 'replacist'. This elite is accused of maintaining a conspiracy of silence on this matter and is supposedly motivated by ideology or economic interest.

Such discourses have their roots in antisemitism during the Third Republic and pre-war nationalism, which targeted Jews, Armenians, Italians, and Maghrebians, among other communities. These discourses continue to this day through neo-Nazism, and have come to specifically target Muslims with the conspiracy theory of Eurabia introduced in 2005 by the British essayist Bat Ye'or, which prefigures the theses put forward five years later by Renaud Camus in his various works."

>Put a bunch of buzz words
>Some fact-checking
>Obligatory mentions of le hekkin antisemitism

[Anonymous No.23010416]

>it is because they don't allow me to deny holocaust
if this is you, go back to your board

[Anonymous No.23010427]

>>23010416
The truth doesn't fear investigation, but the holohoax does.

[Anonymous No.23010449]

>>23010368
>It wasn't even that people would bow to the tyranny, because I understand that
>What was really shocking was how quickly people jumped at the chance to become mini-tyrants themselves,the IT GOES OVER THE NOSE crowd
I mean if they followed the rules set up by the govt, that means they invested some (minimal) effort and believed that it is ok to follow the rules. To see someone breaking those rules is frustrating. To explain it with an analogy: imagine you pay the ticket for public transport, enter the bus/tram/metro and then you see a bunch of niggers jump in without paying; during the ride, they leave garbage in the area, thus actively reducing the quality of service. Wouldn't you feel like an idiot for paying the ticket? The solution is either to be reasonably angry at the niggers for behaving like antisocial niggers, or realising maybe it's better for you to act like a nigger too, so from now on you'll also use transport without paying, leave garbage around, and so on.

[Anonymous No.23010459]

>>23010449
>not wearing a mask is the same as littering
How many boosters you on, bro?

[Anonymous No.23010498]

>>23010449
>I love the roooooools

And then those same people will tell you they need to enforce these ridiculous ideas on you in order to prevent authoritarianism lmao

[Anonymous No.23010523]

>>23010414
I wonder if this has something to do with a sort of mistrust in the idea that people are going to be able to piece things together for themselves.

>Subsequently, it also encompasses all the ensuing consequences on the political, cultural, and spiritual levels, namely the replacement of European civilization with that of the migrants.

If you are a prospective wikipedia editor, and you fear that people are going to read that not as a statement of what the idea is getting at, but a statement of a dogmatic fact, then the "conspiracy theory" buzzword almost serves as a kind of epistemic redflag. It's as though it's now saying "this is not necessarily absolutely true in every way" instead of letting that be implicit in the very fact of its being an article on something of a "theoretical" nature.
Whatever you think of the "Great Replacement", and I can't throw my hat in this ring (I'm historically illiterate), I can't help but feel like the article is going out of it's way to avoid any suggestion that it "endorses" something outside of the mainstream, perhaps out of, as I say, a fear that it will inadvertently mislead people. Trouble is, of course, if you follow the "thou shalt spoonfeed people the right way to think" philosophy to its logical conclusion, you wind up creating a population who have never been taught to think critically; worse, even, a population who don't have the capacity to teach themselves. And that's ignoring who it is that decides "the right way".

[Anonymous No.23010544]

>>23008050
It’s funded by the government now, so no. Government control is always rightwing, no matter the name of the party in control or the backgrounds of the secret service agents.
It’s a wealth of information but all of it should be considered suspect. The material is either slanted or omitted

[Anonymous No.23010551]

>>23010498
>we have to keep drumpf off the ballot to save democracy

[Anonymous No.23010560]

>>23010523
California started including "media literacy" classes in their public school curriculum, that will teach children to only accept ideas provided to them by "legitimate sources".

[Anonymous No.23010561]

>>23010459
Interestingly, for your sort of people it's never just an honest fight against excessive govt control and the actual harm of anti-corona measures.
Personally, since that's the level you attacked now, I'm of the opinion the measures were frequently excessive, failing to do exactly what they were supposed to (stores reducing their working hours obviously forced more people to be in the store at the same time), invasive of people's privacy (in my country they proposed installing some app that would make your phone communicate with nearby phones, so if someone is positive the other people are notified), socially harmful, and so on. It's really nothing conspiratory or radical, in my opinion, the mental health consequences are well-documented, and so on.
Yet, for people like you the real problem was something as trivial as wearing a mask, and the boosters that pretty much nobody took.

>>23010498
I don't think anyone appealed to preventing authoritarianism with the corona measures. In fact, consider Žižek's positive stance on the communality of fighting the disease, and then Agamben who got shat on thoroughly.

>>23010544
>It’s funded by the government now
Which government?

[Anonymous No.23010564]

>>23010544
>Government control is always rightwing
Now say "real communism has never been tried".

[Anonymous No.23010573]

>>23010561
>something as trivial as wearing a mask
>mmmm oppress me harder daddy government oh god yes I fucking love the taste of that boot
kys fag

[Anonymous No.23010624]

for non politicizeable stuff it can be very good, that's about it, I stopped donating years ago when it became obvious which direction it took, IIRC even one of the founders lamented it
I saved pic a while ago because it reads like a parody

[Anonymous No.23010631]

>>23010459
>>23010498
Way to be no better than the tards you were just lambasting by resorting to shit flinging ad homs and twitter-tier meme images. You're part of the problem.

[Anonymous No.23010648]

>>23010631
>both sides are the same
>I am very smart
Shut up, nigger.

[Anonymous No.23010651]

>>23009846
That one is obvious though

[Anonymous No.23010658]

>>23010624
But the text on the right is literally why Evola is/used to be popular, especially on /lit/.
Also, what absolute retard took this screenshot? You don't need archive.org, literally just check the edit history on Wikipedia itself.

[Anonymous No.23010663]

>>23010658
>I see no problem with this
That's because you're part of the problem.

[Anonymous No.23010692]

>>23010663
You haven't addressed the point I'm making. Are you telling me Evola's fascism, traditionalism and general edginess weren't exactly what made him interesting to online right-wingers?
Either way, the currect version is noticably more constrained in its description.

[Anonymous No.23010696]

>>23010631
What are you even talking about sperg. Im laughing at the ridiculousness of people who love following rules so much that they get tricked into being narcs for the nanny state, then have the nerve to claim they are fighting for freedom and democracy.

[Anonymous No.23010706]

>>23010692
>You haven't addressed the point I'm making.
That's because you're missing the point entirely, you fucking faggot. Including all that shit, and especially front-loading the article with it, is meant to skew peoples perception of him as a person instead of attempting to give objective information about his life and work.
>Evola was a RIGHT-WING FASCIST NAZI CONSPIRACY THEORIST DRUMPF SUPPORTER
Go play in traffic.

[Anonymous No.23010738]

>>23010706
I'm not missing the point, I'm aware of it but can somehow also consider it stupid and disingenuous.
>>Evola was a RIGHT-WING FASCIST NAZI CONSPIRACY THEORIST DRUMPF SUPPORTER
See, you can't even criticise the text coherently, you have to make up what it says in order to make it actually look bad.
Tell me three things:
What is your opinion on democracy?
What is your opinion on fascism?
What is your opinion on Evola?

[Anonymous No.23010747]

>>23010738
>engage me on my terms
"No."

[Anonymous No.23010763]

>>23010648
Where did I say that? The other anon offered a rebuttal, to which you reply with internet doggerel akin to the knee jerk behavior you lambasted in literally the previous post. I'm not claiming the middle ground is the highest, I'm calling you a hypocrite

[Anonymous No.23010768]

>>23010763
And I'm calling you a faggot.

[Anonymous No.23010779]

>>23010561
The global oligarchy’s favorite in DC

>>23010564
Marx wrote a book on capitalism and prescribed an asinine scientific socialism of authoritarian state capitalism to pave the way for someday-communism. The same utopian goal the Chinese fascists are saying they’re trying to do.
“Communism” is rooted in the word “community”, IE rule of the people, by the people and for the people.
Please put away your pentagon talking point now and try to think more critically

[Anonymous No.23010780]

>>23010747
Pic related is literally how every “discussion” with a leftoid goes these days

[Anonymous No.23010789]

>>23010779
>“Communism” is rooted in the word “community”, IE rule of the people, by the people and for the people.
Weird how it never turns out like that, ever, and in fact always ends up being a more brutal dictatorship than what preceded it, you colossal fucking nigger.

[Anonymous No.23010797]

>>23010768
Stay on the internet bro, it suits you.

[Anonymous No.23010804]

>>23010747
>>23010768
This is a good example of why right wingers don't and never would be able to control Wikipedia like left-wingers do. They're, contrary to their name, focused on destruction and intellectual laziness. While left-wingers built Wikipedia through honest effort over the years and established it as an important source, right wingers could only focus on vandalising, bickering about a handful of political and historical topics, and on creating Conservapedia.

[Anonymous No.23010830]

>>23010797
>the most miraculous means of communication in human history suits you
Thanks, faggot.
>>23010804
Everything about this post is retarded, please kill yourself immediately.

[Anonymous No.23010857]

>>23010804
>While left-wingers built Wikipedia through honest effort over the years and established it as an important source
lol
lmao

[Anonymous No.23010898]

>>23008050
Rationwiki used to be the leftist site.

[Anonymous No.23010900]

>>23008087
Give us free bitches and we won’t.
>b..but you’re not entitled
stfu. Men on average are stronger than women, we can do this the easy way or the hard way.

[Anonymous No.23010906]

>>23010900
>we can do this the easy way or the hard way
swiggity swooty

[Anonymous No.23010907]

>>23010561
Zizek was just being a gatekeeping asshole

[Anonymous No.23011000]

>>23010804
I wouldn't cherry pick assmad pissbabies on le 4chan as representative of right leaning people. I WOULD agree that those who are most vocal about it, like in this thread, should be kept as far away as possible from that responsibility lmao

[Anonymous No.23011011]

>>23011000
>assmad pissbabies
nice digits, but reddit is down the hall and to the left

[Anonymous No.23011352]

>>23008169
It's kind of crazy to think about. Imagine if the truth about the world and all of history is just what the American regime and Democratic Party teaches. Imagine if this is it. The Whigs were correct. Everyone else is wrong. It's the end of history and chuds and Muslims and radical leftists keep trying to disrupt our perfect liberal utopia. How miserable

[Anonymous No.23011356]

>>23008094
You are litreally going insane, the pattern recognition part of your brain has gone haywire

[Anonymous No.23011396]

>>23011356
I think one of the most evil things about leftoids is the constant gaslighting. In another context, you would be bragging about how important it is to show brown people and women for “representation”. Now you deny that this happening lmao

[Aah Bhi Jah No.23011461]

>>23011356
>STOP NOTICING

[Aah Bhi Jah No.23011469]

>>23008169
have you spoken to a leftist?

[Anonymous No.23011504]

>>23011396
>>23011461
yes, get a job and let it tap you brain energy to earn momey instead
>b-but le monley bad!!!!!
bro im going to ibizia this summer, seeya

[Anonymous No.23011643]

>>23010747
>>23010780
I just bitched and moaned in another thread of how utterly fucking dense anons these days are and lo and behold, the very next thread contains a brilliant example of the exact kind of intellectual laziness I complained about:
There is an attempt to have a discussion that specifically concerns the terms used, but once anon's assertion that the terms used is wrong is challenged, he summarily rejects the basic academic practice of definition of terms by a non-sequitur of a statement that seems to suggest a rational debate is somehow not in anon's ballpark. Which does make sense, anon's original argument seems to have been that people saying Evola walks, talks, and quacks like a duck is offensive because "duck" is a politically incorrect term that hurts anon's feelings, and emotions are what drives anon, not reason. The post is further accompanied by a screencap from a Twitter meme page that parodies normal reasonable discourse that used to be commonplace a decade ago, not by any kind of substantial argument but merely by the adoption of the sarcastic tone of an offended adolescent. Hell, the best I can say about it is that it kind of reminds me of how Aristophanes parodied Socrates which merely undermines anon's attempted point of this being somehow "leftist" way of talking.

[Anonymous No.23011657]

>>23011643
Ok roboto

[Aah Bhi Jah No.23011678]

>>23010658
Sure, but the point of the article should be a well-rounded view of his thought. His fascist aspects were treated in a satisfactory way in the left text.

[Anonymous No.23011731]

>>23008050
Its useful for fields that noone has a reason to bend the truth in or add an ideological bent to. And as a starting point for finding topics to research elsewhere (since basically everything is in it)

[Anonymous No.23011778]

reality has a leftist bias

[γρηγορεύω !!J89a5VVZH9B No.23011831]

>>23008643
Holy based.

[γρηγορεύω !!J89a5VVZH9B No.23011845]

>>23010416

[Anonymous No.23011869]

>>23008114
The amount of weasel words in that paragraph is astounding
>there remains a well documented problem
references two opinion articles where some women complain about random online forums and state that IQ testing is racist because blacks are bad at it
>See such figures as Cyril Burt, J. Phillipe Rushton, Richard Lynn, and Hans Eysenck
not checking all of those but Rushton's article on wiki even is mostly people defending him, and R-K selection is widely accepted. Again most criticisms are just shit like "he's biased because... he just is ok!!?"
Burt's article is talking about accusations that came about when he was fucking dead and have been defended.
>the scientific community
Fake and gay term
>some cases
>blatant fraud
citation needed

The amount of cope is unbelievable. It will be a sunny day if Steve Sailer is ever mentioned on this wiki article in a positive light.
>Verification not required.