/lit/ - Literature

[niloy No.22708063]

how did he have the confidence or motivation in himself to write timeless plays even with that hairline?

[Anonymous No.22708081]

>>22708063
Because he didn't exist.

[Anonymous No.22708087]

>>22708063
He didn't.

[niloy No.22708095]

>>22708081
umm so who wrote the plays???

[Anonymous No.22708096]

>>22708063
philosophy of baldness will never catch on, i've tried. bald naturalism on the other hand is incredibly popular.

[niloy No.22708098]

>>22708096
>philosophy of baldness
what's that

[Anonymous No.22708110]

>>22708081
>>22708087
>>22708095

[Anonymous No.22708119]

The American, dull commercial pedant that he is, loves slicing people up into quantifiable component parts, measuring this, that and the other, ranking everyone according to some figment of an objective scale. But in the days when the rose of masculinity was in full bloom, and the lusty love of life, the roar of the blood, and the sword-gleam of wit counted for far more than your percentile position on the height distribution chart, a man was taken as a living whole, his face - be it never so ruddy, misshapen or scarred - as the mere emblem, the battle flag of the spirit within him: and no bitter-hearted pedant's comparisons of hairlines or what have you could ever quench the swagger of a truly manly soul.

[niloy No.22708120]

>>22708110
did you make this?

[Anonymous No.22708121]

All literature is an attempt to cope with Norwood 2.5+.

[Anonymous No.22708123]

>>22708098
you trying to base someone's entire life around one thing, much like how you are defined by being a penis haver. it just doesn't work. how can he have confidence or motivation if he is something else schizo?

[Anonymous No.22708130]

>>22708119
Rating a man based on appearance is a feminine trait. No man ever cared that caesar was bald

[Anonymous No.22708138]

>>22708095
Some of the lesser played works are perhaps some contemporary's. This >>22708087 guy thinks it's Bacon. Other anon thinks he doesn't exist at all. Which is ridiculous.

Nothing wrong with being bald. Women find it attractive, and for the only reason being that it's a male trait. Those that tend to not like baldness are the younger girls. Who naturally want a younger man. Fussy over your or lack thereof is like a woman fussing over makeup etc.

[Anonymous No.22708144]

>>22708138
>>22708110
both bald and world famous figures.
/thread

[Anonymous No.22708146]

>>22708130
>No man ever cared that caesar was bald
he himself did by wearing a coronet to hide his hairline. So caesar was feminine by your logic

[Anonymous No.22708149]

>>22708138
>Women find it attractive, and for the only reason being that it's a male trait.
citation needed

[Anonymous No.22708217]

>>22708149
Women find it attractive on men. Yes, usually older women, but as you know many younger women do like an older man. Ten, twenty or more rarely older still. The maturity is a turn-on. Modern culture has many scared of old age though and some can go their whole lives not liking it. But that's like finding men who hate to see their wives without makeup. It takes all kinds. But the #1 trait women of all ages tend to demand is drive, ambition, purpose.
Get passionate about something, and yes, something lucrative, and you'll have a wider range of women eager to talk to you.

[Anonymous No.22708256]

>>22708146
Caesar also bathed & groomed himself
Nothing wrong with improving your appearance as much as possible. All men should. But it doesn't matter that much in the end

[Anonymous No.22708271]

>>22708063
>>22708087
>>22708110
>>22708138
Marlowe wrote the plays. He is stylometrically indistinguishable from shakespeare.

[Anonymous No.22708292]

>>22708271
No, just some of the cheaper ones. Authorship of them must have been lost and some fool could only think of the most popular writer if the period and threw them all together.

Also allow for artistic renditions. Shakespeare would have been like everyone else and taken a work by a lesser writer and spun it his way with one degree or another.

[Anonymous No.22708318]

>>22708063
People weren’t as autistic about “looksmaxing” like millions of dopamine addicted zoomers are now. They had bigger problems to worry about than “norwooding” or “mewing”

[Anonymous No.22708323]

>>22708292
You misunderstand. Shakespeare's plays and Marlowes writing are mathematically indistinguishable.

See Ron Maimon's answer here:
https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/a/10412/61307

[Anonymous No.22708344]

>>22708323
>Artists take into account math while writing.
>Mathematicians think they can decipher the (fake) mystery of Shakespearian authenticity

>>22708318
"Looksmaxing" was a thing dreamed up by the commercial age to get us to buy their shit.

[Anonymous No.22708564]

>>22708344
>"Looksmaxing"
largely depends on the visual intelligence of women

[Anonymous No.22708616]

>>22708063
Because William "Shake-Spear" was actually an ethiopean moor.