[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 54 KB, 739x415, IMG_1492.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22703958 No.22703958 [Reply] [Original]

CHRISTIAN STIRNERISTS IN THE HOUSE TONIGHT

>> No.22704099

based.

>> No.22704174

>>22703958
daring synthesis

>> No.22704307

>>22703958
Christian nietzschean here following my will to christ

>> No.22704355

>>22703958
im convinced this meme is propped up by a seething Marxist trying to make Egoism look retarded

>> No.22704442
File: 347 KB, 1075x850, SPOOKED-dot-com - Stirner.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22704442

>>22703958
>Makes 1 image.
>No Christian Stirnerist funposts.
Here:
God is real. God created rules for humans to follow. If the unique does not follow God's rules, he will sentence him to eternal touture after his physical death.
Therefore: Anything God wants the unique (as an individual) to do is NOT a spook and should be treated as "Realer than real." Furthermore, one should study, with great carefulness, what are social constructs created from the human mind(spooks), and which are present in the bible(non-spooks).

>> No.22704445
File: 482 KB, 830x830, 1695572542328.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22704445

>>22703958
>>22704099
>>22704174
>>22704307
>>22704355
>>22704442

>> No.22704449
File: 85 KB, 1024x416, Stirner.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22704449

>>22704307

>> No.22704453

>>22703958
Descartes was the better Christian

>> No.22704459

>>22704442
Based Egoistchad

What should we call ourselves? Christgoists?

>> No.22704497

>>22704459
>Names.
>Anything but spooks.

>> No.22704548

>>22704442
Shit, that is actually based.

>> No.22706145

Bump

>> No.22706152

Stirner memes really are the best philosophy memes.

>> No.22707257

>spooks are bad except the spooks I believe in

>> No.22707327

>>22704174
There is some justification for it. I feel like Jesus does kind of appeal to people’s natural animalistic/egoistic selfishness with his constant food analogies. One of the proofs of the gospels is that it’s just seen and treated as if it’s the highest most satiating thing possible for the individual. Most of the apostles are characterized by their discernment, doubt and animalistic shrewdness. They have no idea what Jesus is talking about and are always arguing amongst themselves, they’re really just along for the ride because they’re hungry. That’s what makes them the best people at the time, they are the ones with the highest mental affinity for a type of impossible luxury that they feel they deserve to inherit