[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 13 KB, 300x300, C_-oeTpVwAEel7K.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22619292 No.22619292 [Reply] [Original]

Good philosophy (free of contradictions or agendas) eventually boils down to either: 1) Berkeley (positive); 2) Schopenhauer (negative); or 3) Parmenides (philosophy is impossible as it would violate the unity of Being). If it doesn't, then there are kinks, interpretations, or contradictions that need to be worked out before the big picture falls into place. Change my mind.

>> No.22619513

>>22619292
>free of agendas
All philosophy has an "agenda", you retarded twat, the "agenda" being the will of the author. Your post's agenda is to push the thought that all philosophy eventually boils down to either Berkeley, Schopenhauer, or Parmenides (which is utterly insane) and you presuppose any difference is a "kink, misinterpretation, or contradiction". You should feel bad.

>> No.22619532

>>22619513
I meant "agenda" as in not arguing in good faith, e.g. obfuscating something that could be clarified easily. There's nothing wrong with an agenda as long as somebody is forthright about it and still allows space for reason.