What did Nietzsche mean by this?

[Anonymous No.22504472]

>My formula for greatness in a human being is amor fati: that one wants nothing to be different, not forward, not backward, not in all eternity. Not merely to bear what is necessary, still less conceal it ... but love it.
>Ecce Homo
Is it the endgame of copes or does it really have a point?

[Anonymous No.22504509]

>>22504472
>My formula for greatness in a human being is amor fati
>amor fati
>fati

[Anonymous No.22504529]

>>22504472
Why is his cock inside a hat?

[Anonymous No.22504572]

>>22504529
Ask the post-modern "sculptor" who did it.

[Anonymous No.22504658]

>>22504529
You know why

[Anonymous No.22504665]

>>22504472
Didn't this dude die alone and insane? Not exactly a great success

[Anonymous No.22504666]

>>22504472
Nietzsche idea is to embrace your feminine side in order to salvage atheism as a social norm.

So Nietzsche and women share the same spirit. They experience literally no disconnect between saying X when it feels good to say X, and completely betraying and contradicting X five seconds later when it feels good to do that. women like to "try on" male-centric morals and virtues like children playing dress-up, but they don't actually know what it means to set up a virtue as an objective principle for oneself and then resist the temptation to break it in future moments when it stops being convenient and pleasant.

so if you ask a woman what kind of guy she values, she will blab on and on for hours about how noble she is and how she sees through superficiality and only wants sweet genuine men and etc., etc., etc. then five seconds later she'll completely contradict everything she said. the key thing to understand about women is that they don't perceive any difference here. from a man's perspective, you are thinking "but she said 'i only do X' and two seconds later she did 'non-X'?" this is because the fundamental modality of male consciousness is erecting principles and trying to follow them - even if you're a shitty man, it just means you're shitty and weak at erecting principles, not that the FUNDAMENTAL modality of principle-erection is absent. a woman's fundamental modality is "doing what i feel like." to a woman, that behavior is completely consistent: in the first instance, she did what she felt like. then she did what she felt like again. only a man perceives that the CONTENT of the actions was contradictory, i.e., would be contradictory if performed by a man. but for a woman whose primary stream of consciousness is "what do i want to do right now? :) perhaps i'll wear a ribbon in my hair tomorrow, trala la!," no such contradiction occurred, or indeed is even possible.

[Anonymous No.22504671]

>>22504666
Sounds nice and believable, but sadly this is not the key fundamental difference between the sexes that applies without exception. There's still women who can be consistent and principled.

[Anonymous No.22504711]

>>22504666
Fuck... my father was raised by his mother. And he acts exactly this way, my mother too but she takes it to a schizo extreme. I feel disgust when it happens to me

[Anonymous No.22504744]

>>22504658
>vacation with friends