Why does no one understand Heidegger?

[Anonymous No.22446397]

[Anonymous No.22446767]

Heidegger really isn’t that bad he writes out what he is doing pretty clearly, as long as you catch on to his new vocabulary which there are many dictionaries of Heidegger’s language out there

[Anonymous No.22446813]

>>22446767
Where does Heidegger meet Deleuze? How does Dasein deal with Oedipus?

[Anonymous No.22446847]

>>22446813
Deleuze is an orthodox Kojevean Heideggerian/Hegelian insofar as he rejects Kojeve and is thus subsumed into Kojeve's neoliberal dialectic. See the neoliberalization of deleuze...

[Anonymous No.22446940]

>>22446767
The main issue ive had with B&T is its density, but I don't think it's Heidegger's fault. I was reading around 2 chapters every 3 days, and maybe that was not enough time to metabolize everything.
In general he is a very forgiving writer. He makes it sure to define his terminology, and repeats his previous points up to a fault, just in case the reader had already forgotten them. Still, due to its density one still has to go at a very slow pace

[Anonymous No.22446951]

>>22446847
Why are hegelians like this? You think that x is a moment in development if thought y even if they never had anything to do with y. Anything that doesn’t fit in your historicism bullshit is forced to fit into it.

[Anonymous No.22447001]

>>22446951
Not that anon, but keep in mind that Kojeve and Hegel are not the same. Hegel is not an historicist

[Anonymous No.22447005]

>>22446397
*crack* *sip* oh yeah, I love my heidegger phenomenological filtration 5000. I just put a zoomer in and get a zero ultra out.

[Anonymous No.22447074]

>>22446847
>>22446951
Those motherfuckers.

[Anonymous No.22447195]

>>22446397
Because their illiterate retards incapable of basic reading skills. You don't skim read Heidegger.

[Anonymous No.22447201]

>>22446847
????
dude whatever

[Anonymous No.22447497]

>>22446813
>>22446847
>>22447001
Where does Bataille meet Deleuze?