[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 21 KB, 274x475, 101157.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22403493 No.22403493 [Reply] [Original]

>Source? Trust me bro

>> No.22403501

she's a based lesbian and slightly crazy
Verification not required.

>> No.22403564

>source for your intrepretation of art
DUHHHHHH

>> No.22403571
File: 219 KB, 1266x2048, nature Biden.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22403571

>>22403493

>> No.22403576
File: 46 KB, 300x300, ca6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22403576

>>22403493
haha nice one, anon! pwned

>> No.22403610

>>22403493
>Source?
>SOURCE
>got any studies on that???
>Source???
Fuck off back.

>> No.22404942

>>22403493
everything in this book is stolen, she calls herself non-binary because she hates women

>> No.22404947

One of the greatest books ever written

>> No.22405017
File: 52 KB, 1280x720, 169265282447138.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22405017

>>22403493
CAMILLE

>> No.22405025

>>22403493
source for what, are you retarded?

>> No.22405126

>>22404942
Kinda based ngl

>> No.22405185

>>22403493
Finally someone said it... Frick this pedophilia supporter

>> No.22405306

>>22403493
Freud and Freudian interpretations are the definition of charlatanic.

>> No.22405475
File: 84 KB, 837x960, source.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22405475

>>22403493

>> No.22406308

>>22403493
The first chapter is the greatest 30 pages of the modern era

>> No.22406788

>>22406308
post an excerpt

>> No.22406790

>>22405185
>Frick
The antipedophile, expectedly, is an extreme social conformist (can't even use swear words on 4chan).

>> No.22406793

>>22403610
The only reliable source is peer-reviewed study. Otherwise you will be fooled by biased pseudo-empirical study.

>> No.22406819

She writes very well and has that rare gift of writing criticism in so enthusiastic way, in talking about literature with a prose so full of warm flesh and nerves and veins, that she indeed makes you go after the works she is analyzing.

This passage in Shakespeare’s language, for example:

>Shakespearean language is a bizarre super-tongue, alien and plastic, twisting, turning, and forever escaping. It is untranslatable, since it knocks Anglo-Saxon root words against Norman and Greco-Roman importations sweetly or harshly, kicking us up and down rhetorical levels with witty abruptness. No one in real life ever spoke like Shakespeare's characters. His language does not "make sense," especially in the greatest plays. Anywhere from a third to a half of every Shakespearean play, I conservatively estimate, will always remain under an interpretive cloud. Unfortunately, this fact is obscured by the encrustations of footnotes in modern texts, which imply to the poor cowed student that if only he knew what the savants do, all would be as clear as day. Every time I open Hamlet, I am stunned by its hostile virtuosity, its elusiveness and impenetrability. Shakespeare uses language to darken. He suspends the traditional compass points of rhetoric, still quite firm in Marlowe, normally regarded as Shakespeare's main influence. Shakespeare's words have "aura." This he got from Spenser, not Marlowe.

That said, her conclusions are all opinions without any real basis on reality. Her view about Emily Dickinson’s psyche and personality goes completely against much that we know from letters and personal reports of the time she was alive. She took some aspects of Dickinson’s mind that she liked (Dickinson’s understanding and acceptance of the brutalities of the world, and her almost artic irony in face of the indifference of the cosmos) and forced her hand to expand those traits so much as if they were the major aspects of Dickinson’s life.

>> No.22407319

>>22406790
Classic chud logic

>> No.22407362
File: 42 KB, 680x940, Eapm6VjXkAY5SzB-2265790299.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22407362

>mfw I read a 19th century philosopher and realize he doesn't even cite peer reviewed meta-analyses to support his arguments

>> No.22408722

>>22407362
This is different. She’s making Freudian claims on already extremely well documented figures. For example, claiming Dickinson was sadomasochistic because she used words like “chained”

>> No.22408860

>>22405017
kek'd

>> No.22409220

>>22407319
>I identify attacks on conformism with the dominant discourse's badword for what's evil and low-status
You've never had an independent thought in your life.