[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 286 KB, 1080x1080, 1690686266393605.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22394866 No.22394866 [Reply] [Original]

Television and film as a medium have gotten boring as of late, I think I've seen everything worth seeing in it. So I've decided to switch h to books but I don't know where to start what are some books for a TV brain such as myself that aren't to challenging and will ease me into learning to read recreationally?

>> No.22394873

Jules Verne and HG Wells are good places to start.

>> No.22394880
File: 499 KB, 700x700, homer.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22394880

Start with the Greeks

>> No.22394881

>>22394873
They seem like good picks but I've seen most of their books in movie form won't that ruin the story for me or are they different enough that it won't be an issue?

>> No.22394883

>>22394880
Had to read this in HS and found it pretty dense.

>> No.22394884

>>22394866
sorry, would love to help but just dont want to

>> No.22394885

>>22394866
The L. A. Quartet
The Killer Inside Me
Lonesome Dove
Crime and Punishment

>> No.22394889
File: 96 KB, 1079x925, IMG_0189.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22394889

>>22394881
If you saw the movies and you are over 18 then you won’t get much enjoyment out of the books. They’re really lame. They’re recommended often for beginners because they’re easy to read and fun adventure but as books they are not that /lit/. I would recommend Canterbury Tales, Decameron and the Arabian Nights. Short crass stories with deeper messages. Those were my first foray into literature.

>> No.22394894

>>22394889
Shit advice. Wells is a good writer and worth reading.

>> No.22394899

>>22394894
Wells is fun if you are in HS. Chaucer’s erotic tales of vagrants and thieves were much more exciting to me than lame sci fi moralism and they are of higher poetic quality. My recs are actual recs for /lit/ users. It is called gatekeeping.

>> No.22394901

>>22394894
All the “HS reading list” tier recommendations like Verne and Wells and Great Gatsby should be dumped out. That kind of stuff is fine for kids but it won’t get an ADULT into reading.

>> No.22394914
File: 177 KB, 898x631, 5465464645.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22394914

I trust Nabokov over a derangedd homosexual cuck and you guys should do the same.
>With regard to science fiction, Nabokov does express "the deepest admiration" for H.G. Wells; and he names as special favorites five of Wells's stories, all of which had been identified, generically, as science-fiction works well before Ada came to be written. The Time Machine, The Invisible Man, The War of the Worlds, The First Men in the Moon, and "The Country of the Blind"

>> No.22394922

>>22394914
If you want to take the Nabokov route he also said Phileas Fogg>>22394873 was a “childhood hero” but that he had a lesser opinion of Verne as an adult. He called him a kids writer. On that point, I would not differentiate far from him. I think Verne is a kids writer but I would add Wells to their ranks as well.

I do not hate either but that are more academic and /lit/ tier stuff you could rec to him besides genre fic you read in hs.

>> No.22394923

>>22394866
If you want a book that’s like an 80’s action movie, read Neuromancer. If you want a book that’s good read Stoner.

>> No.22394931

>>22394914
Personally, the beginner recs in the sticky and the stuff usually said here (Grapes of Wrath, Great Gatsby, Call of the Wild, Verne) upsets me because I never would’ve gotten into lot with that stuff plus most people already read that in HS. Don’t be afraid to rec Petronius or something. Idk I never would’ve picked up a book if Time Machines by Wells were the only thing I read.

>> No.22394938

>>22394922
I'm not talking about Verne. I'm talking about Wells for whom Nabokov have the deepest admiration. More so than certain other writers.

>> No.22394944

>>22394938
Well I am not the Wells fan he was. I know for a fact we read Time Machine in the 8th grade and I know for a fact I couldn’t give less of a shit about it, then or now.

>> No.22394948

>>22394931
Yea why should a beginner reader read famous easy and entertaining books when he could read Middle English poetry from the 1300s lmao

>> No.22394952

read Oedipus Rex

>> No.22394957

>>22394944
Your mistake is thinking I care what some faggot cuck like you thinks. I care what Nabokov thinks.

>> No.22395000

>>22394901
>All the “HS reading list” tier recommendations like Verne and Wells and Great Gatsby should be dumped out
Wells writes simply but that doesn't make him a bad writer. Despite his naive socialism, he delves into some complex themes r.e the transition to modern socities.
In "War of the Worlds" he delivers a rather prophetic account of global carnage prior to either of the world wars, and carries a somewhat interesting and entertaining critique of mass media.

>> No.22395019

>>22394948
Anyone can read a poem which is 50 something lines such as the Cooks Tale. I took it upon myself to gatekeep /lit/ and do the job at keeping the rabble at bay. We don’t need a starter chart which is stuff everyone should’ve read at 15.

>> No.22395025
File: 9 KB, 136x154, IMG_0265.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22395025

>>22394957
My father was a Chaucerian scholar from Cambridge who wrote a dissertation on “cuckoldry, the highest of the arts” as he put it. His reverse reading of the Merchants tale as an early form of cuck porn rather than as it was traditionally marked as a critique of women was actually influential in its day, no joke. I will not link it here because I don’t need you doxxing and harassing me.

>> No.22395321
File: 40 KB, 480x360, knk.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22395321

>>22394866
Just read Manga, there is some pretty unique stuff out there.

>> No.22395343

>>22395025
>>22395019
Op here, You seem like a massive faggot desu. I think I'll read Wells and Gatsby just spite you

>> No.22395356
File: 229 KB, 720x730, herzog-8395.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22395356

Werner Herzog reading list:

Required reading
>Virgil’s “Georgics”
>Ernest Hemingway’s “The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber”
>Baker's "The Peregrine" (New York Review Books Edition published by HarperCollins)
Suggested reading
>The Warren Commission Report
>“The Poetic Edda”, translated by Lee M. Hollander (in particular The Prophecy of the Seeress)
>Bernal Diaz del Castillo “True History of the Conquest of New Spain”

>> No.22395661
File: 57 KB, 976x850, 1692395753502093.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22395661

Is tv/film bad for you after a certain age?

>> No.22395797

>>22394866
Newbies should be reading adventurous books.
>Jack London's short stories
>Robert Louis Stevenson's Kidnapped, Master of Ballantrae
>Stephen Crane's Open Boat etc
>Melville's Typee, Benito Cereno
>Conrad's Typhoon, End of the Tether
>Kipling
Throw in some horror like:
>Ambrose Bierce
>Algernon Blackwood
>M.R. James
>Poe's stories (some of which are also adventure, like the Gold-Bug)

>> No.22395802

>>22394866
Gravity's Rainbow

>> No.22395807

>>22395661
what do YOU mean bad for you.....

>> No.22395808
File: 47 KB, 1536x864, Oppenheimer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22395808

>>22395661
How are you going to quote the Bhagavad Gita during sex if you can't read?

>> No.22397337

>>22395661
Probably not bad but if your a binge watcher like me then you've probably seen everything worth watching by your mid 20s

>> No.22397341

Start with Call of the Crocodile

>> No.22397696

>>22395661
I'd say yes, at least for me. I enjoyed watching television and film when I was a teenager, but now that I'm 32, I think it's almost a worthless medium. There's maybe 30-40 good movies and a small handful of television shows, and the rest can be discarded. Literature has an enormous amount of great material, and the relatively good authors and their stuff that's far more obscure and nearly forgotten, is still better than the best of film and tv.
I've honestly lost almost all respect for visual mediums after discovering the greats of literature.

>> No.22397866
File: 37 KB, 960x544, 1691610017622.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22397866

>>22394866
Have you watched every single kino movie from the 50s and 60s? I didnt fucking think so. Get back on the on couch anon and keep watching you fraud!

>> No.22397879

>>22395661
No...? You just get new perspectives on the things your watching. Maybe you feel this way because your watching goyslop made to be as consumable as possible?

>> No.22397912

>>22394866
>as of late.

>> No.22398009

>>22397866
>Have you watched every single kino movie from the 50s and 60s?
Yes I have seen everything

>> No.22398019

>>22394866
>books for a TV brain
Baby steps. Why don't you look into novels that were adapted into film (Godfather, the recent HEAT 2 follow up). These are solid as well >>22394873 >>22395356

>> No.22398170

>>22398009
Post your top 10 50-60s kino right now

>> No.22398234

>>22398170
Rear Window
Lawrence of Arabia
Dr. Zhivago
Vertigo
The searchers
Kiss me deadly
The quiet man
Once upon a time in the west
The man who shot liberty vance
My fair lady

>> No.22398238

>>22394866
Start with Gene Wolfe. His books got me back into recreational reading.